Cited by 111Electronic Health Records SystemsHealth Sciences Research and EducationMedical Coding and Health Information

Bridging The Inferential Gap: The Electronic Health Record And Clinical Evidence: Emerging tools can help physicians bridge the gap between knowledge they possess and knowledge they do not.

Open access
Stewart, Walter F., Shah, Nirav R., Selna, Mark J., Paulus, Ronald A., Walker, James M.·2007·Health Affairs

Abstract

Most clinical decisions involve bridging the inferential gap: Clinicians are required to "fill in" where they lack knowledge or where no knowledge yet exists. In this context we consider how the inferential gap is a product, in part, of how knowledge is created, the limits to gaining access to such knowledge, and the variable ways in which knowledge is translated into decisions. We consider how electronic health records (EHRs) will help narrow this gap by accelerating the creation of evidence relevant to everyday practice needs and facilitating real-time use of knowledge in practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w181

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia: 1998. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, W. F., Shah, N. R., Selna, M. J., Paulus, R. A., & Walker, J. M.
Affiliations
Geisinger Medical Center (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2007-01
Volume
26
Issue
Suppl1
Pages
w181-w191
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2115967402
Cited by
111
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
17.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (L30 HL086108)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health records, clinical evidence, evidence-based practice, knowledge translation, clinical decision-making, knowledge production
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Quality of Health Care, United States, Program Evaluation, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Evidence-Based Medicine, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review