Cited by 312Neuroscience of respiration and sleepObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchRespiratory and Cough-Related Research

The Pathophysiology of Hyperventilation Disorders

Gardner, William N.·1996·Chest

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.109.2.516

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardner, W. N.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gardner, William N.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-02
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
516-534
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009168665
Cited by
312
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
Keywords
hyperventilation, pathophysiology, cerebrospinal fluid, respiratory alkalosis
MeSH terms
Acid-Base Equilibrium, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Coronary Circulation, Humans, Hyperventilation, Respiration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review