Cited by 23Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchCoffee research and impactsSleep and related disorders

Sleep-Disordered Breathing and Caffeine Consumption

Open access
Aurora, R. Nisha, Crainiceanu, Ciprian, Caffo, Brian, Punjabi, Naresh M.·2012·Chest

Abstract

Background Sleepiness is one of the most burdensome symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). While caffeine is frequently used to avert sleepiness, the association between SDB and caffeine use has not been thoroughly explored. The current study examined whether SDB is associated with caffeine consumption and if factors such as sex, age, and daytime sleepiness explain or modify the association.Methods Data from the Sleep Heart Health Study, a community-based study on the consequences of SDB, were used to characterize the association between SDB and caffeine intake. SDB was assessed with full-montage polysomnography. Caffeine use was quantified as the number of cans of soda or the cups of coffee or tea consumed daily. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale was used to assess daytime sleepiness. Multivariable negative binomial regression models were used to characterize the independent association between SDB and caffeine use.Results Caffeinated soda, but not tea or coffee, intake was independently associated with SDB severity. Compared with participants without SDB, the relative ratios for caffeinated soda consumption in women with mild, moderate, and severe SDB were 1.20 (CI, 1.03-1.41), 1.46 (CI, 1.14-1.87), and 1.73 (CI, 1.23-2.42), respectively. For men, an association was only noted with severe SDB and caffeinated soda use. Age did not modify the SDB-caffeine association, and sleepiness could not explain the observed associations.Conclusions SDB is independently associated with caffeinated soda use in the general community. Identifying excessive caffeine used in SDB has potential significance given the cardiovascular effects of caffeine and untreated SDB.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.11-2894

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In men, there is only an association between caffeinated soda and severe SDB.

    “Women with SDB have the strongest correlations between caffeinated soda and OSA. There was only an association between caffeinated soda and severe SDB in men.524 Coffee and tea consumption were not associated with SDB.”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [524]

  • Coffee and tea consumption are not associated with SDB.

    “Women with SDB have the strongest correlations between caffeinated soda and OSA. There was only an association between caffeinated soda and severe SDB in men.524 Coffee and tea consumption were not associated with SDB.”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [524]

  • In the SHHS, women with SDB have the strongest correlations between caffeinated soda and OSA.

    “Women with SDB have the strongest correlations between caffeinated soda and OSA. There was only an association between caffeinated soda and severe SDB in men.524 Coffee and tea consumption were not associated with SDB.”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [524]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]15. Redline S , Sanders MH , Lind BK , et al ; Sleep Heart Health Research Group . Methods for obtaining and analyzing in a large community sample of Australian twins . Addiction . 2005 ; 100 ( 10 ): 1510 -1517 .
  2. [22]22. unattended polysomnography data for a multicenter study . Sleep . 1998 ; 21 ( 7 ): 759 -767 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aurora, R. N., Crainiceanu, C., Caffo, B., & Punjabi, N. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Punjabi, Naresh M.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
142
Issue
3
Pages
631-638
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163619279
Cited by
23
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (HL086862, HL075078)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep-disordered breathing, caffeine consumption, daytime sleepiness, sex differences, Sleep Heart Health Study
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Caffeine, Carbonated Beverages, Coffee, Data Collection, Drinking Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Tea, Prevalence, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review