Cited by 571Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Sleepiness, fatigue, tiredness, and lack of energy in obstructive sleep apnea

Chervin, Ronald D.·2000·Chest

Abstract

Study objectives Sleepiness is a key symptom in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and can be objectively assessed with a multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). We studied the terms that patients prefer to describe their symptoms-sleepiness, fatigue, tiredness, or lack of energy-and how these terms relate to objective findings.Design Observational.Setting University-based sleep laboratory.Patients Consecutive OSAS patients referred for diagnostic polysomnography and an MSLT.Methods Data were obtained from sleep studies and questionnaires.Results Subjects included 117 men and 73 women, with a mean (+/- SD) age of 49 +/- 13 years, an apnea and hypopnea rate of 32 +/- 28/h of sleep, and an MSLT mean sleep latency of 7 +/- 5 min. Subjects more frequently reported problems with fatigue, tiredness, and lack of energy than sleepiness (57%, 61%, and 62% vs 47%). When required to select the one most significant symptom, more patients chose lack of energy (about 40%) than any other problem, including sleepiness (about 22%). Objective measures of sleepiness and apnea severity showed little or no association with any symptom, but female gender showed significant associations with each.Conclusions Complaints of fatigue, tiredness, or lack of energy may be as important as that of sleepiness to OSAS patients, among whom women appear to have all such complaints more frequently than men. The diagnosis of OSAS should not be excluded based only on a person's tendency to emphasize fatigue, tiredness, or lack of energy more than sleepiness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1378/chest.118.2.372

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chervin, R. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Chervin, Ronald D.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-08
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
372-379
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167365741
Cited by
571
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K02 NS02009, K02NS002009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, sleepiness, fatigue, lack of energy, symptom terminology, patient-reported symptoms, multiple sleep latency test, apnea-hypopnea index, sex differences, sleep apnea diagnosis
MeSH terms
Circadian Rhythm, Diagnosis, Differential, Physical Exertion, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Polysomnography, Observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review