Cited by 62Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBariatric Surgery and OutcomesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Self-assessed emotional factors contributing to increased weight gain in pre-surgical bariatric patients

Walfish, Steven·2004·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Background One important part of the pre-surgical mental health evaluation is to assess what, if any, emotional factors may be related to a patient's eating behavior. In this way, appropriate biopsychosocial interventions may be designed to facilitate their long-term maintenance of weight loss. The current investigation examined the role that negative emotional states might play in increased pre-surgical eating behavior in a sample of bariatric surgery patients.Methods A sample of 122 female patients completed the Weight and Lifestyle Inventory as a component of a comprehensive psychological evaluation. This questionnaire contains 6 items that assess the degree of 6 negative emotional states. These data were examined to determine which negative emotional states were most frequently related to increased eating behavior. In addition, the frequency of reporting multiple emotional contributors to eating was also examined.Results Eating when stressed received the highest scores, followed by eating when bored, eating when depressed, eating when anxious, eating when angry, and eating when tired. A large segment (38%) of the sample indicated that emotional factors did not contribute a large amount to their increased weight gain, while on the other hand, a large segment (40%) could be identified as "emotional eaters."Conclusion To increase the likelihood of long-term maintenance of weight loss, a significant portion of this patient population would benefit from interventions targeting overcoming boredom, reducing stress, and managing depression. In the pre-surgical evaluation, it is important to identify those patients who are "emotional eaters" and to refer them for appropriate interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1381/0960892042583897

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 6 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walfish, S.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Walfish, Steven
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2004-11-01
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
1402-1405
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2031567015
Cited by
62
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
emotional eating, bariatric surgery
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Emotions, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Life Style, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Preoperative Care, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sampling Studies, Self Concept, Gastric Bypass, Weight Gain, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review