Cited by 29Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Shame and Self-Compassion as Risk and Protective Mechanisms of the Internalized Weight Bias and Emotional Eating Link in Individuals Seeking Bariatric Surgery

Open access
Braun, Tosca D., Gorin, Amy A., Puhl, Rebecca M., Stone, Andrea, Quinn, Diane M., Ferrand, Jennifer, Abrantes, Ana M., Unick, Jessica +2 more·2021·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Background Emotional eating in bariatric surgery patients is inconsistently linked with poor post-operative weight loss and eating behaviors, and much research to date is atheoretical. To examine theory-informed correlates of pre-operative emotional eating, the present cross-sectional analysis examined paths through which experienced weight bias and internalized weight bias (IWB) may associate with emotional eating among individuals seeking bariatric surgery.Methods We examined associations of experienced weight bias, IWB, shame, self-compassion, and emotional eating in patients from a surgical weight loss clinic (N = 229, 82.1% female, M. BMI: 48 ± 9). Participants completed a survey of validated self-report measures that were linked to BMI from the patient medical record. Multiple regression models tested associations between study constructs while PROCESS bootstrapping estimates tested the following hypothesized mediation model: IWB ➔ internalized shame ➔ self-compassion ➔ emotional eating. Primary analyses controlled for adverse childhood experiences (ACE), a common confound in weight bias research. Secondary analyses controlled for depressive/anxiety symptoms from the patient medical record (n = 196).Results After covariates and ACE, each construct accounted for significant unique variance in emotional eating. However, experienced weight bias was no longer significant and internalized shame marginal, after controlling for depressive/anxiety symptoms. In a mediation model, IWB was linked to greater emotional eating through heightened internalized shame and low self-compassion, including after controlling for depressive/anxiety symptoms.Conclusions Pre-bariatric surgery, IWB may signal risk of emotional eating, with potential implications for post-operative trajectories. Self-compassion may be a useful treatment target to reduce IWB, internalized shame, and related emotional eating in bariatric surgery patients. Further longitudinal research is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-021-05392-z

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients who have a high degree of internalized shame about having obesity may have the lowest levels of self-compassion.

    “Indeed, patients who have a high degree of internalized shame (e.g., feelings of inadequacy, inferiority) about having obesity may have the lowest levels of self-compassion (25).”

    From Behavioral Interventions to Attenuate Driven Overeating and Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

    In the Results (Serial mediation model; page unavailable), the paper reports a pathway through greater internalized shame followed by greater self-compassion, contrary to the claimed pattern of the lowest self-compassion among patients with high shame. The Discussion also describes patients reporting internalized shame alongside self-compassion, rather than characterizing high shame as linked to the lowest self-compassion. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Emotion-based eating is associated with emotion dysregulation, poor emotion regulation skills, low distress tolerance, dietary restraint, loss of control of eating, poor awareness of hunger/fullness signals, body image dissatisfaction, internalized shame, and low self-compassion.

    “In addition to depression, emotion-based eating is associated with many other factors, including emotion dysregulation, poor emotion regulation skills, low distress tolerance, dietary restraint, loss of control of eating, poor awareness of hunger/fullness signals, body image dissatisfaction, internalized shame, and low self-compassion (24–29).”

    From Behavioral Interventions to Attenuate Driven Overeating and Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction and Discussion (page unavailable) link emotional eating with emotion dysregulation, internalized shame, and lower self-compassion in people seeking bariatric surgery. The paper does not establish the full list of associations in the citing sentence, including low distress tolerance, dietary restraint, loss of control of eating, or poor awareness of hunger and fullness signals. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients seeking bariatric surgery who have high levels of internalized shame and low levels of self-compassion also report high levels of emotion-based eating.

    “Specifically, a recent study found that patients seeking bariatric surgery who have high levels of internalized shame (e.g., feelings of inferiority, inadequacy, insignificance) and low levels of self-compassion (e.g., disapproving of perceived personal inadequacies, feeling alone in perceived failures) also report high levels of emotion-based eating (25).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braun, T. D., Gorin, A. A., Puhl, R. M., Stone, A., Quinn, D. M., Ferrand, J., Abrantes, A. M., Unick, J., Tishler, D., & Papasavas, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Hartford Hospital (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Braun, Tosca D.
  • Gorin, Amy A.
  • Puhl, Rebecca M.
  • Stone, Andrea
  • Quinn, Diane M.
  • Ferrand, Jennifer
  • Abrantes, Ana M.
  • Unick, Jessica
  • Tishler, Darren
  • Papasavas, Pavlos
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2021-04-27
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
3177-3187
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W3157668372
Cited by
29
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL076134)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
weight bias internalization, emotional eating
MeSH terms
Body Image, Cross-Sectional Studies, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Morbid, Shame, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review