Cited by 21Agricultural Engineering and MechanizationRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydrodynamic Separation of Grain and Stover Components in Corn Silage

Savoie, Philippe, Shinners, Kevin J., Binversie, Benjamin N.·2004·Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

Abstract

Mixing fresh silage in water resulted in partial segregation of grain from stover. Grain concentration was 75% in the sunk material when silage was relatively dry (64% moisture content [MC]) and 41% when silage was relatively wet (74% MC). Partial drying to remove 20 percentage units of moisture prior to water separation increased grain concentration to 92%, and complete drying increased grain concentration to 99%. Sieving without drying followed by water separation resulted in a grain concentration of 79%. A byproduct of water separation is a large amount of soluble and deposited fine particles in the effluent: 18% of original dry matter after one separation, and between 21 and 26% after eight separations. In an industrial setting, hydrodynamic separation of silage with minimal pretreatment could provide a feedstock with a high concentration of grain (75-80%). In a laboratory setting, hydrodynamic separation with prior oven drying could provide a method to separate grain from stover in corn silage by reaching a grain concentration higher than 99%.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1385/abab:113:1-3:041

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Savoie, P., Shinners, K. J., & Binversie, B. N.
Affiliations
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Savoie, Philippe
Venue
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
Published
2004
Volume
113
Issue
1-3
Pages
041-054
ISSN
0273-2289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006803037
Cited by
20
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
corn silage, hydrodynamic separation, grain segregation, stover, water separation, silage moisture content, oven drying, grain concentration, silage effluent
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animal Feed, Biotechnology, Edible Grain, Zea mays, Silage, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review