Silage review: Recent advances and future technologies for whole-plant and fractionated corn silage harvesting
Open accessAbstract
Over the last 25 years, whole-plant corn silage has become an important and popular feedstuff for dairy production. Copious research has been dedicated to the development and evaluation of alternatives to enhance the nutritive value of whole-plant corn silage. These efforts have been aimed at manipulating the physical and chemical characteristics of whole-plant corn silage in an effort to maximize dairy profitability. Results from this review indicate that optimization of harvest maturity, kernel processing, theoretical length of cut, and cutting height improve or maintain the nutritive value and milk production of lactating dairy cows. Technological advancements have been developed and made available to dairy producers and corn growers desiring to enhance fiber and starch digestibility of whole-plant corn silage. Future research should be directed toward further assessment of new processors available in the market and the development of assessment methods for optimization of crop processor settings, harvest efficiency, and nutritional modeling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
24 of 155 cited sources checked · 13 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Theoretical length of cut settings were shorter for unprocessed than processed whole-plant corn silage treatments in most studies.
“TLOC settings were shorter for unprocessed than processed WPCS treatments in most studies (Bal et al., 2000a;Dhiman et al., 2000;Weiss and Wyatt, 2000;Schwab et al., 2002;Ouellet et al., 2003;Cooke and Bernard, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Kernel vitreous endosperm proportion increases with increased DM content of whole-plant corn silage.
“Kernel vitreous endosperm proportion increases with increased DM content of WPCS (Philippeau and Michalet-Doreau, 1997;Johnson et al., 1999); greater kernel hardness causes kernels in very dry WPCS to be less susceptible to breakage during kernel processing at harvest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Philippeau and Michalet-Doreau, 1997 source
- cites Johnson et al., 1999 source
The In situ digestibility section discusses vitreous endosperm and separately relates corn-grain DM to starch digestibility. The Nutritive value of corn silage–animal studies section says whole-plant DM increases with maturity, but neither passage says that the proportion of vitreous endosperm increases as whole-plant silage DM increases. Searched for that relationship using vitreousness, maturity, DM, and kernel hardness. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Particle size of processed whole-plant corn silage harvested with longer theoretical length of cut settings was similar to unprocessed silages in some but not all studies.
“In addition, particle size of processed WPCS harvested with longer TLOC settings was similar to unprocessed silages in some (Dhiman et al., 2000, trial 2;Schwab et al., 2002;Cooke and Bernard, 2005) but not all (Bal et al., 2000a;Dhiman et al., 2000, trial 3;Weiss and Wyatt, 2000) studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Harvest practices such as proper maturity at harvest, kernel processing, theoretical length of cut, and cutting height are well-established management tools for improving physical and chemical characteristics and hence nutrient digestibility of whole-plant corn silage.
“Harvest practices, such as proper maturity at harvest, kernel processing, theoretical length of cut (TLOC), and cutting height are well-established management tools for improving physical and chemical characteristics and hence nutrient digestibility of WPCS (Johnson et al., 1999;Allen et al., 2003;Buxton and O'Kiely, 2003;Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Johnson et al., 1999 source
The Introduction and Conclusions (pages not provided) identify harvest maturity and mechanical processing as factors in corn-silage nutritive value and digestibility. The Particle size section discusses theoretical length of cut, but the paper says evidence on its interaction with processing is limited; the searched passages do not address cutting height as a tool for improving digestibility. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Buxton and O'Kiely, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Corn-stover tissue is sufficiently damaged by processing to increase ruminal fiber degradation.
“Although corn-stover tissue is sufficiently damaged by processing to increase ruminal fiber degradation (Johnson et al., 1999;Bal et al., 2000b), these effects are often inconsistent (Allen et al., 2003;Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Johnson et al., 1999 source
The “In situ responses—corn silage” section reports greater NDF disappearance after mechanical processing, consistent with increased ruminal fiber degradation. But it presents damage to corn-stover tissue as the explanation with “We hypothesize,” whereas the citing sentence states that mechanism as fact. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Bal et al., 2000b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Cell wall digestibility of corn plants is diminished by advanced maturity.
“As with other forage crops, cell wall digestibility of corn plants is diminished by advanced maturity (Johnson et al., 1999;Bal et al., 2000b;Buxton and O'Kiely, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Johnson et al., 1999 source
- cites Bal et al., 2000b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Buxton and O'Kiely, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Increased surface area for bacterial attachment when whole-plant corn silage comprises short particles may also increase NDF digestibility despite its faster passage rate.
“In contrast, increased surface area for bacterial attachment when WPCS comprises short particles may also increase NDF digestibility despite its faster passage rate (Johnson et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Johnson et al., 1999 source
The Particle size section (page unavailable) reports that processing produces smaller corn-silage particles, and In situ responses—corn silage (page unavailable) reports greater NDF disappearance after processing, hypothesizing that damaged stover permits greater microbial attack. The copy does not establish increased surface area for bacterial attachment as the mechanism or say that this benefit occurs despite a faster passage rate. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Delayed whole-plant corn silage maturity at harvest impairs nutrient digestibility.
“Despite the effects on nutrient concentrations, delayed WPCS maturity at harvest impairs nutrient digestibility (Johnson et al., 1999;Allen et al., 2003;Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Johnson et al., 1999 source
- cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Greater physically effective NDF was previously reported to increase total mixed ration sorting by dairy cattle.
“When feeding WPCS harvested at longer TLOC settings, it is important to monitor for selective consumption of particles because greater peNDF was previously reported to increase TMR sorting (Leonardi and Armentano, 2003) by dairy cattle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Leonardi and Armentano, 2003 source
The Results and Conclusions report greater TMR sorting with 40% than with 20% chopped alfalfa hay, and cows sorted against the longest particles. The paper does not establish that greater physically effective NDF caused the increase: the Results say the effect could reflect either the particle-size distribution or the lower moisture content of the higher-hay diet. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Lactation performance of mid-lactation cows was not improved when cutting height was increased from 10.2 to 30.5 cm.
“In contrast, lactation performance of mid-lactation cows was not improved when cutting height was increased from 10.2 to 30.5 cm in the study by Bernard et al. (2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bernard et al., 2004 source
- Premisecitation
Particle size reduction of the kernel fraction of the corn plant has been shown to improve feeding and storage characteristics along with milk production.
“Particle size reduction of the kernel fraction of the corn plant has been shown to improve feeding and storage characteristics along with milk production (Shinners et al., 2000;Johnson et al., 2002a,b;Cooke and Bernard, 2005;Shinners and Holmes, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Shinners et al., 2000 source
- cites Johnson et al., 2002a,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Cooke and Bernard, 2005 source
The Intake and Digestibility section reports better fiber digestion with kernel processing and greater starch digestibility with more aggressive processing. Production Response reports higher milk yields for one processed-silage treatment than another, but the response depended on length of cut. The paper does not establish improved storage characteristics; its silage-characteristics discussion instead reports a tendency toward higher pH and lower lactic acid in processed silage. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Alkali-treatment of whole-plant corn silage and fractionated whole-plant corn silage were successful at improving intake and milk production by dairy cows similarly to the well-established effects of brown midrib whole-plant corn silage.
“Overall, alkali-treatment of WPCS and fractionated WPCS were successful at improving intake and milk production by dairy cows similarly to the well-established effects of BMR WPCS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Cook et al., 2016 source
- Premisereasoning
Due to its ease of use on-farm, the Penn State Forage and TMR Particle Separator (PSPS) is the most frequently used particle separation technique in the dairy industry.
“Due to its ease of use on-farm, the Penn State Forage and TMR Particle Separator (PSPS; Lammers et al., 1996) is the most frequently used particle separation technique in the dairy industry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Lammers et al., 1996 source
The Abstract describes the forage and TMR separator, and the Conclusions (page unavailable) say it is easy to operate and can be used directly on farms. Our copy does not establish that it is the most frequently used technique in the dairy industry or that ease of use explains its prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
At equal theoretical length of cut settings, processing reduced the percentage of whole-plant corn silage particles retained above the 18- or 19-mm sieves by 20%, on average, across all studies.
“At equal TLOC settings, processing reduced the percentage of particles retained above the 18-or 19-mm sieves by 20%, on average, across all studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Compared with conventional-processed whole-plant corn silage, the most obvious visual difference for corn shredlage was the greater proportion of long stover particles in corn shredlage.
“Thus, compared with conventional-processed WPCS (CPCS), the most obvious visual difference for SHRD was the greater proportion of long stover particles in SHRD (Table 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The corn shredlage method allowed whole-plant corn silage to be harvested at a longer theoretical length of cut while maintaining or improving the degree of kernel processing.
“Nevertheless, this new method allowed WPCS to be harvested at a longer TLOC while maintaining or improving the degree of kernel processing (Table 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There is no evidence that the use of a corn shredlage processor attenuates or overcomes the negative effects of maturity on starch digestibility.
“There is no evidence, however, that the use of SHRD processor attenuates or overcomes the negative effects of maturity on starch digestibility, and further research is warranted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Results from initial development tests show the image-processing algorithm is capable of distinguishing different mean particle sizes from samples collected at different kernel processor settings (2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-mm processor gap clearance).
“Results from initial development tests show the algorithm is capable of distinguishing different mean particle sizes from samples collected at different kernel processor settings (2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-mm processor gap clearance; Table 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 7
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Whole-plant corn silage maturity at harvest, expressed as DM content, is related to ruminal in situ (at 28 h) or in vitro (at 48 h) NDF digestibility of corn stover.
“Relationship between whole-plant corn silage maturity at harvest (expressed as DM content) and ruminal in situ (at 28 h; adapted from Row et al., 2016) or in vitro (at 48 h; adapted from Lewis et al., 2004) NDF digestibility of corn stover.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Row et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Lewis et al., 2004 source
- Findingcitation
There is an interaction between kernel processing and DM content of whole-plant corn silage on total-tract digestibility of dietary starch.
“Interaction between kernel processing and DM content of whole-plant corn silage on total-tract digestibility of dietary starch (% of intake).*P < 0.01.Adapted from Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
There is a relationship between DM concentration and vitreousness in corn kernels.
“Relationship between DM concentration and vitreousness in corn kernels.Adapted from Philippeau and Michalet-Doreau (1997), Correa et al. (2002), Johnson et al. (2002a), and Ferraretto et al. (2015a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Image analysis based mean particle size determination of chopped, processed, and dried corn kernels differs by processor roll gap settings.
“Image analysis based mean particle size (MPS) determination of chopped, processed, and dried corn kernels and multiple processor roll gap settings 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Cutting height (low or high) affects whole-plant corn silage nutrient composition, digestibility, and yield.
“Effect of cutting height (low or high) on whole-plant corn silage nutrient composition, digestibility, and yield 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mechanical processing affects the percentage of whole-plant corn silage particles retained above the 18- or 19-mm sieves under similar or different theoretical length of cut settings.
“Effects of mechanical processing on percentage of whole-plant corn silage particles retained above the 18-or 19-mm sieves under similar or different theoretical length of cut (TLOC) settings”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Particle size of whole-plant corn may be reduced by up to 40% with the use of a kernel processor at equal theoretical length of cut settings.
“Particle size of whole-plant corn may be reduced by up to 40% with the use of a kernel processor at equal TLOC settings (Schurig and Rodel, 1993;Roberge et al., 1998;Shinners et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Greater kernel hardness causes kernels in very dry whole-plant corn silage to be less susceptible to breakage during kernel processing at harvest.
“greater kernel hardness causes kernels in very dry WPCS to be less susceptible to breakage during kernel processing at harvest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Advancements in nutritional quality of whole-plant corn silage through hybrid selection programs were marginal in the last century.
“Despite continual improvements in total DM and kernel productivity of corn hybrids, advancements in nutritional quality of WPCS through hybrid selection programs were marginal in the last century (Lauer et al., 2001;Ferraretto and Shaver, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lauer et al., 2001 source
- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Breakage of the seed coat is required for improved digestibility of corn kernels.
“therefore, breakage of the seed coat is required for improved digestibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Effects of processing on ruminal fiber degradation are often inconsistent.
“these effects are often inconsistent (Allen et al., 2003;Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The fraction of broken and cracked kernels was approximately 99, 96, and 88% of total kernel mass when roll gap settings were 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively.
“Shinners et al. (2000) reported the fraction of broken and cracked kernels to be approximately 99, 96, and 88% of total kernel mass when roll gap settings were 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shinners et al., 2000 source
- Premisecitation
When whole-plant corn was harvested with a harvester set for a 19-mm theoretical length of cut and equipped with processing rolls (roll gap set at 1 to 3 mm), broken and cracked kernels were greater than 90% of total kernel mass.
“Conversely, when whole-plant corn was harvested with a harvester set for a 19-mm TLOC and equipped with processing rolls (roll gap set at 1 to 3 mm), broken and cracked kernels were >90% of total kernel mass (Shinners et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shinners et al., 2000 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The greater total-tract starch digestibility with 1- to 3-mm roll gap settings was likely related to the extent of kernel breakage.
“This was likely related to the extent of kernel breakage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
From a meta-analysis of whole-plant corn silage trials with lactating dairy cows, total-tract starch digestibility was 5.9 and 2.8 percentage units greater when whole-plant corn silage was processed using 1- to 3-mm roll gap settings compared with 4- to 8-mm processed or unprocessed whole-plant corn silage.
“Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b), from a meta-analysis of WPCS trials with lactating dairy cows, reported 5.9-and 2.8-percentage-units greater total-tract starch digestibility (TTSD) when WPCS was processed using 1-to 3-mm roll gap settings compared with 4-to 8-mm processed or unprocessed WPCS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
According to Allen et al. (2003), crushing cobs is one of the greatest advantages of using processing rolls because it allows for greater theoretical length of cut without eliciting selective consumption of dietary fractions by cows.
“According to Allen et al. (2003), crushing cobs is one of the greatest advantages of using processing rolls because it allows for greater TLOC without eliciting selective consumption of dietary fractions by cows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Increasing theoretical length of cut from 9.5 to 19 mm without processing rolls reduced the proportion of broken and cracked kernels by 10 percentage units (61 vs. 51% of total kernel mass), on average, in whole-plant corn samples harvested between one-third and three-quarters kernel milk line.
“Shinners et al. (2000) reported that increasing TLOC settings from 9.5 to 19 mm without the addition of processing rolls reduced the proportion of broken and cracked kernels by 10 percentage units (61 vs. 51% of total kernel mass, respectively), on average, in whole-plant corn samples harvested between one-third and three-quarters kernel milk line.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shinners et al., 2000 source
- Premisecitation
The use of processing rolls eliminated intact cobs in the study by Shinners et al. (2000).
“Moreover, the use of processing rolls eliminated intact cobs in the study by Shinners et al. (2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shinners et al., 2000 source
- Premisecitation
Greater physically effective NDF may limit intake through reduced ruminal passage rate and increased fill.
“Regardless of the benefits of achieving greater peNDF with forage particles of greater length, it may limit intake through reduced ruminal passage rate and increased fill (Mertens, 1987).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mertens, 1987 source
- Premisecitation
Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b) reported greater NDF digestibility when whole-plant corn silage was harvested above 40% DM in a meta-analysis of feeding trials.
“Surprisingly, however, Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b) reported greater NDF digestibility when WPCS was harvested above 40% DM in a meta-analysis of feeding trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Sorting behavior increased for dairy cows fed unprocessed whole-plant corn silage harvested at 22.3 mm compared with a theoretical length of cut of 4.8 mm.
“Kononoff et al. (2003b) reported that sorting behavior increased for dairy cows fed unprocessed WPCS harvested at 22.3 mm compared with a TLOC of 4.8 mm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kononoff et al., 2003b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Delayed maturity at harvest impairs the utilization of the kernel fraction.
“Along with negative effects on the stover fraction, delayed maturity at harvest also impairs the utilization of the kernel fraction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Reduced total-tract starch digestibility was observed in diets containing whole-plant corn silage with greater than 40% DM in the meta-analysis of Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b).
“Reduced TTSD was observed in diets containing WPCS with >40% DM in the meta-analysis of Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Targeting delayed maturity at harvest for greater concentrations of starch may come at the expense of stover digestibility.
“Therefore, targeting delayed maturity at harvest for greater concentrations of starch may come at the expense of stover digestibility (Allen et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Inconsistent effects of theoretical length of cut on nutrient digestibility and lactation performance by dairy cows were reported by Allen et al. (2003).
“Inconsistent effects of TLOC on nutrient digestibility and lactation performance by dairy cows were reported by Allen et al. (2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Minimal effects of theoretical length of cut settings on lactation performance were observed by Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b).
“Likewise, minimal effects of TLOC settings on lactation performance were observed by Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The combined effect of theoretical length of cut and kernel processing is more important than theoretical length of cut alone with regard to total-tract starch digestibility.
“These data underscore that the combined effect of TLOC and kernel processing is more important than TLOC alone with regard to TTSD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Effects of mechanical processing on animal performance and nutrient utilization were inconsistent.
“Furthermore, Allen et al. (2003) reported effects of mechanical processing on animal performance and nutrient utilization were inconsistent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis of published trials reported a decline in actual and fat-corrected milk yields (2.0 and 2.7 kg/cow per day, on average, respectively) when whole-plant corn silage was harvested above 40% DM.
“Recently, a meta-analysis of published trials (Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b) reported a decline in actual and fat-corrected milk yields (2.0 and 2.7 kg/cow per day, on average, respectively), when WPCS was harvested above 40% DM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Digestibility of NDF was not altered by theoretical length of cut.
“Digestibility of NDF was not altered by TLOC (Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Increased kernel hardness may limit the percentage of fractured kernels during whole-plant corn silage processing.
“correspondingly may limit the percentage of fractured kernels during WPCS processing, as previously discussed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Greater stover lignification during maturation of the corn plant is related to diminished cell wall digestibility.
“This is related to greater stover lignification during maturation of the corn plant (Table 3; Hunt et al., 1989;Cone and Engels, 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Even the exposed endosperm is not fully digested due to existence of a starch-protein matrix formed in the chemical bonding of zein protein with starch granules.
“Furthermore, even the exposed endosperm is not fully digested due to existence of a starch-protein matrix formed in the chemical bonding of zein protein with starch granules (Kotarski et al., 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kotarski et al., 1992 source
- Premisecitation
Lower ruminal in vitro starch digestibility when corn kernels were harvested at intervals between one-half of milk line and black layer was related to increased proportion of vitreous endosperm in corn kernels with advanced maturity.
“Lower ruminal in vitro starch digestibility reported by Ngonyamo-Majee et al. (2009) when corn kernels were harvested at intervals between one-half of milk line and black layer was related to increased proportion of vitreous endosperm in corn kernels with advanced maturity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ngonyamo-Majee et al., 2009 source
- Interpretationcitation
The effect of sorting on cows fed longer theoretical length of cut may be attenuated by adequate processing of whole-plant corn silage and its effect on cob particle size.
“However, this effect may be attenuated by adequate processing of WPCS and its effect on cob particle size (Shinners et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shinners et al., 2000 source
- Premisecitation
No effect of theoretical length of cut on total-tract starch digestibility was observed in the meta-analysis report of Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b).
“Despite the aforementioned interaction between TLOC and kernel processing on kernel damage and corresponding TTSD, no effect of TLOC on TTSD was observed in the meta-analysis report of Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Reduction in particle size with the use of processing rolls suggests a need for longer theoretical length of cut when cows are fed processed whole-plant corn silage.
“Thus, reduction in particle size with the use of processing rolls (Table 2) suggests a need for longer TLOC when cows are fed processed WPCS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The decline of ruminal in situ and in vitro NDF digestibility in mature corn stover continues to be reported.
“But the decline of ruminal in situ and in vitro NDF digestibility in mature corn stover continues to be reported (Figure 2; Lewis et al., 2004;Row et al., 2016) and further research is warranted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lewis et al., 2004 source
- cites Row et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Bal et al. (2000a) reported longer ascension times for unprocessed or 19.0-mm processed whole-plant corn silage than for the other treatments.
“The authors evaluated ascension time, the time necessary for a weight to ascend from the bottom of the rumen to the surface, as an indicator of ruminal mat consistency, and reported longer ascension times for unprocessed or 19.0-mm processed WPCS than for the other treatments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bal et al., 2000a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The reduced total-tract starch digestibility with greater than 40% DM whole-plant corn silage is likely related to an increase in the proportion of vitreous endosperm in the kernel associated with greater maturity.
“This is likely related to an increase in the proportion of vitreous endosperm in the kernel associated with greater maturity (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
An algorithm that utilizes crop type, pressure, DM content, and layer thickness increases the accuracy of feed-roll displacement-based forage yield monitors.
“Results produced an algorithm that utilizes crop type, pressure, DM content, and layer thickness to increase the accuracy of feed-roll displacement-based forage yield monitors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ehlert, 2002 source
- Premisecitation
Brown midrib (BMR) hybrids showed no benefit to increased cutting heights.
“Recommendations from this study were to increase cutting height on leafy hybrids of corn for corn silage quality improvement, but brown midrib (BMR) hybrids showed no benefit to increased cutting heights.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lewis et al., 2004 source
- Premisecitation
Decreased DM yields due to increased cutting heights from 15 to 46 cm were offset by an increase in milk yield at the higher cutting height.
“Decreased DM yields due to increased cutting heights from 15 to 46 cm were offset by an increase in milk yield at the higher cutting height.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lewis et al., 2004 source
- Premisecitation
Drier or more mature corn at harvest requires a shorter theoretical length of cut to provide better packing and storage characteristics in bunker silos.
“Drier or more mature corn at harvest requires a shorter TLOC to provide better packing and storage characteristics in bunker silos (Allen et al., 2003;Shinners, 2003;Deere and Co., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Shinners, 2003 source
- cites Deere and Co., 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The greater dry matter intake for cows fed rolled high-moisture shelled corn than for snaplage diets was likely due to greater starch digestibility for the snaplage.
“Greater DMI for cows fed RHMC (27.1 kg/d) than for SNAP (24.9 kg/d) and SPDC (24.2 kg/d) was likely due to greater starch digestibility for the snaplage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Akins and Shaver, 2014 source
- Premisecitation
Longer theoretical length of cut may impair kernel breakage even when self-propelled forage harvesters are fitted with processing rolls.
“As noted previously, however, longer TLOC may impair kernel breakage even when SPFH are fitted with processing rolls (Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Feeding corn shredlage offers dairy producers and their nutritionists an opportunity to feed whole-plant corn silage containing a greater proportion of coarse particles without compromising kernel breakage, energy availability, and sorting behavior.
“These results suggest that feeding SHRD offers dairy producers and their nutritionists an opportunity to feed WPCS containing a greater proportion of coarse particles without compromising kernel breakage, energy availability, and sorting behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Milk fat percentage was reduced by 0.27 percentage units for snaplage at 29% of diet DM compared with rolled high-moisture shelled corn.
“Reduced milk fat percentage, by 0.27 percentage units, for SNAP compared with RHMC was likely due to greater starch digestibility for SNAP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Akins and Shaver, 2014 source
- Premisecitation
Large plant particles could be maintained while the kernel fraction particle size was reduced due to the speed differential of the shredding rolls.
“This study showed that large plant particles could be maintained while the kernel fraction particle size was reduced due to the speed differential of the shredding rolls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2003 source
- Premisenone given
Despite the greater theoretical length of cut, improved milk fat content and rumination activity were not observed in feeding trials.
“Despite the greater TLOC, improved milk fat content and rumination activity were not observed in feeding trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vanderwerff et al., 2015 source
- Premisecitation
Greater lactation performance was observed for corn shredlage compared with conventional-processed whole-plant corn silage either when using a conventional (1.0 kg/d per cow greater 3.5% fat-corrected milk) or a brown midrib (1.5 kg/d per cow greater milk yield) corn hybrid.
“Greater lactation performance was observed for SHRD compared with CPCS either when using a conventional (1.0 kg/d per cow greater 3.5% FCM; Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012a) or a BMR (1.5 kg/d per cow greater milk yield; Vanderwerff et al., 2015) corn hybrid.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vanderwerff et al., 2015 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The corn shredlage response was likely related to greater kernel breakage during passage through rolls and the corresponding increased surface area allowing for enhanced bacterial attachment and digestion.
“This response was likely related to greater kernel breakage during passage through rolls and the corresponding increased surface area allowing for enhanced bacterial attachment and digestion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The reduced milk fat percentage for snaplage at 29% of diet DM compared with rolled high-moisture shelled corn was likely due to greater starch digestibility for snaplage.
“Reduced milk fat percentage, by 0.27 percentage units, for SNAP compared with RHMC was likely due to greater starch digestibility for SNAP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Akins and Shaver, 2014 source
- Premisecitation
Zhang et al. (2003) developed a shredding and flail chopping forage harvester.
“Zhang et al. (2003) developed a shredding and flail chopping forage harvester.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2003 source
- Premisereasoning
Cows fed rolled high-moisture shelled corn had greater dry matter intake (27.1 kg/d) than cows fed snaplage at 29% of diet DM (24.9 kg/d) and snaplage at 20% of diet DM plus dry ground shelled corn at 9% of diet DM (24.2 kg/d).
“Greater DMI for cows fed RHMC (27.1 kg/d) than for SNAP (24.9 kg/d) and SPDC (24.2 kg/d) was likely due to greater starch digestibility for the snaplage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Akins and Shaver, 2014 source
- Interpretationnone given
Harvesting corn snaplage is a viable alternative to rolled high-moisture shelled corn.
“Harvesting corn snaplage is a viable alternative to rolled high-moisture shelled corn (RHMC).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A shaking frequency of 1.1 Hz or greater and a 17-cm stroke length provides sufficient force and frequency for separation.
“Results showed that a shaking frequency of 1.1 Hz or greater and a 17-cm stroke length provides sufficient force and frequency for separation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kononoff et al. (2003a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Savoie et al. (2004) developed a method for partial separation of the kernel from the stover fraction in chopped and processed whole-plant corn silage.
“Savoie et al. (2004) developed a method for partial separation of the kernel from the stover fraction in chopped and processed WPCS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Savoie et al. (2004) source
- Interpretationcitation
CSPS determinations performed on fermented samples obtained from silos before feeding may be more accurate than those performed on samples obtained before ensiling.
“These data suggest that CSPS determinations performed on fermented samples obtained from silos before feeding may be more accurate than those performed on samples obtained before ensiling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Adjustments to harvest practices, such as increasing the cutting height, have been shown to improve feeding value of whole-plant corn silage.
“Adjustments to harvest practices, such as increasing the cutting height, have been shown to improve feeding value of the WPCS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Moisture content of the samples had little effect on particle size distribution results except when the moisture content of the sample was almost completely dry.
“Moisture content of the samples had little effect on particle size distribution results except when the moisture content of the sample was almost completely dry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kononoff et al. (2003a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Recent research has shown image analysis can be effectively used to quantify the particle size distribution of particulate materials.
“recent research has shown image analysis can be effectively used to quantify the particle size distribution of particulate materials”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
No relationship with verbal theoretical length of cut was observed when mean particle length was evaluated after removal of the kernel fraction through an adaptation of the hydrodynamic separation method.
“The same authors also attempted to evaluate MPL after removal of the kernel fraction through an adaptation of the hydrodynamic separation method of Savoie et al. (2004), but no relationship with verbal TLOC was observed either.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Salvati et al. (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Savoie et al. (2004) source
- Interpretationreasoning
Benefits of using shredlage processors may not be as pronounced in the field as in the reviewed feeding trials.
“Thus, benefits of using shredlage processors may not be as pronounced in the field as in the reviewed feeding trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Optimal kernel processing can be achieved regardless of the type of chopper or processor used.
- Premisecitation
Traditional sieving analysis underestimated particle length by 31% compared with image analysis.
“Results indicated that traditional sieving analysis underestimated particle length by 31% compared with image analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Savoie et al. (2014) source
- Interpretationreasoning
Reductions in yield from increasing cutting height were offset by increases in feeding value.
“Reductions in yield were offset by increases in feeding value.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
No relationship between verbal theoretical length of cut and mean particle length of whole-plant corn silage samples from varied harvest conditions was reported.
“Not surprisingly, no relationship between verbal TLOC and MPL of WPCS samples from varied harvest conditions was reported.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Salvati et al. (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
An image-processing algorithm has been developed to assess the particle size distribution of kernels contained within chopped and processed whole-plant corn silage.
“An image-processing algorithm has been developed to assess the particle size distribution of kernels contained within chopped and processed WPCS (kernel fraction index determination via image analysis techniques; B. D. Luck, unpublished data, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites B. D. Luck, unpublished data, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
It is well established that kernel particles of varied sizes have different starch digestibility.
“Nevertheless, it is well established that kernel particles of varied sizes have different starch digestibility (Dias Junior et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dias Junior et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Mean particle length assessment at harvest is crucial to achieve desired levels of physically effective neutral detergent fiber.
“Therefore, MPL assessment at harvest is crucial to achieve desired levels of peNDF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 49
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKernel processing lessened the amount of intact kernels when theoretical length of cut was 11.1 mm, but not when it was 27.8 or 39.7 mm.
“Johnson et al. (2003) reported that kernel processing lessened the amount of intact kernels when TLOC was 11.1 mm, but not when 27.8 or 39.7 mm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Johnson et al., 2003 source
The discussion of intact kernels (page not available in our copy) says that processing did not reduce their amount in experiment 1, which tested all three stated cut lengths. Table 3 reports more intact kernels at 11.1 mm with processing (23.3%) than without it (16.1%), the opposite of the claimed reduction. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHigher ruminal propionate concentrations for cows fed processed whole-plant corn silage may decrease meal size and thus dry matter intake.
“Alternatively, higher ruminal propionate concentrations for cows fed processed WPCS (Dhiman et al., 2000;Schwab et al., 2002;Johnson et al., 2003) may decrease meal size and thus DMI (Allen et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe total-tract starch digestibility response to processing rolls at different theoretical length of cut settings was thought to be related to greater kernel breakage by cutting knives at the lower theoretical length of cut or inhibition of kernel breakage during passage through the rollers by the stover portion at the longer theoretical length of cut.
“These results were thought to be related to greater kernel breakage by cutting knives at the lower TLOC (Johnson et al., 1999) or inhibition of kernel breakage during passage through the rollers by the stover portion at the longer TLOC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Johnson et al., 1999 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPeak milk production was achieved when whole-plant corn silage was harvested at approximately 35% DM or between one-half and two-thirds kernel milk line.
“The authors revealed that peak milk production was achieved when WPCS was harvested at approximately 35% DM or between one-half and two-thirds kernel milk line.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Johnson et al., 1999 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThe greater NDF digestibility above 40% DM could be related to less negative effects of greater ruminal starch digestibility on NDF digestibility for drier, more mature whole-plant corn silage.
“According to the authors, this could be related to less negative effects of greater ruminal starch digestibility on NDF digestibility for drier, more mature WPCS (Russell and Wilson, 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Russell and Wilson, 1996 source
The Introduction and In Vitro Studies sections support the general mechanism: faster starch fermentation can lower ruminal pH, and lower pH can inhibit cellulose digestion. The paper does not address NDF digestibility specifically in drier, more mature whole-plant corn silage or a threshold above 40% dry matter; that application is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDelayed whole-plant corn silage harvest increases starch concentration and decreases CP, NDF, and ash concentrations.
“Several reviews emphasize an increased concentration of starch and corresponding decline in CP, NDF, and ash concentrations with delayed WPCS harvest (Johnson et al., 1999;Allen et al., 2003;Buxton and O'Kiely, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Johnson et al., 1999 source
The “Nutritive value of corn silage—animal studies” section says starch tends to increase and CP and NDF tend to decline with advancing maturity. It does not report a corresponding decline in ash concentration, so Johnson et al. support only part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Buxton and O'Kiely, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFractionation of corn plants at harvest could be used as a tool in ration formulation; for example, by separating and feeding the less digestible fraction, the stalks, to animals of lower energetic demand.
“Cook et al. (2016) suggested this fractionation of corn plants at harvest could be used as a tool in ration formulation; for example, by separating and feeding the less digestible fraction, the stalks, to animals of lower energetic demand (i.e., heifers, far-off dry cows).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Cook et al., 2016 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe stover fraction is also crushed and mean particle length is reduced when forage harvesters are equipped with processing rolls, particularly under tighter roll-gap settings.
“But the stover fraction is also crushed and MPL reduced when forage harvesters are equipped with processing rolls (Table 2; Johnson et al., 2003), particularly under tighter roll-gap settings (Shinners et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe general trend of rated engine power for self-propelled forage harvesters is increasing, with large gains in maximum power of the largest machines over the past 17 years.
“The general trend of rated engine power for SPFH is increasing, with large gains in maximum power of the largest machines over the past 17 years, the largest of which was rated greater than 800 kW.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationRated engine power (kW) is related to terminal year of manufacture of self-propelled forage harvesters from 2000 to 2017.
“Rated engine power (kW) versus terminal year of manufacture of self-propelled forage harvesters from 2000 to 2017.All models produced by 4 major self-propelled forage harvester companies are included in this data (IRON Solutions Inc., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IRON Solutions Inc., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataShredlage processor affects whole-plant corn silage particle size, corn silage processing score, and ruminal in situ digestibility.
“Effects of shredlage processor on whole-plant corn silage particle size, corn silage processing score (means ± SD), and ruminal in situ digestibility”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe starch endosperm in corn kernels is protected by the pericarp, which, if intact, is highly resistant to microbial attachment and enzymatic digestion.
“The starch endosperm in corn kernels is protected by the pericarp, which, if intact, is highly resistant to microbial attachment and enzymatic digestion (McAllister et al., 1994); therefore, breakage of the seed coat is required for improved digestibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McAllister et al., 1994 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHarvesting silage with processing rolls increased diet total-tract starch digestibility when theoretical length of cut was set at 0.93 to 2.86 cm, but not when the theoretical length of cut setting was shorter or longer.
“Harvesting silage with processing rolls increased diet TTSD when TLOC was set at 0.93 to 2.86 cm, but not when the TLOC setting was shorter or longer (Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe use of processing rolls increased total-tract starch digestibility for diets containing whole-plant corn silage with 32 to 40% DM at feed-out, but not when whole-plant corn silage was above 40% DM.
“A meta-analysis of recent studies revealed the use of processing rolls increased TTSD for diets containing WPCS with 32 to 40% DM at feed-out, but not when WPCS was above 40% DM (Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b; Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationNo differences in dry matter intake or milk yield were noted between whole-plant corn silage processed at 1 to 3 mm and unprocessed whole-plant corn silage.
“No differences, however, were noted between WPCS processed at 1 to 3 mm and unprocessed WPCS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFerraretto and Shaver (2012b) reported no influence of kernel processing on dry matter intake with a trend toward greater milk yield for whole-plant corn silage processed at 1 to 3 mm or unprocessed compared with whole-plant corn silage processed at 4 to 8 mm.
“Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b) reported no influence of kernel processing on DMI with a trend toward greater milk yield for WPCS processed at 1 to 3 mm or unprocessed compared with WPCS processed at 4 to 8 mm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDelayed maturity at harvest has been suggested as a management tool to increase DM and starch yields per hectare.
“Thus, delayed maturity at harvest has been suggested as a management tool to increase DM and starch yields per hectare (Owens, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Owens, 2014
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe combination of opposing factors for short and long forage particles may explain the lack of theoretical length of cut effects.
“Perhaps the combination of these opposing factors for short and long forage particles may explain the lack of TLOC effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAllen et al. (2003) suggested the optimum harvest point for whole-plant corn silage to be in the range of 32 to 35% DM.
“Later, Allen et al. (2003) suggested the optimum harvest point for WPCS to be in the range of 32 to 35% DM, but noted that more research trials were warranted, particularly on the interactions among maturity at harvest, hybrid types, and diet formulation strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPhysically effective NDF is positively associated with chewing activity, ruminal pH, and milk fat content.
“This is particularly desirable with increasing dietary concentrations of rapidly fermentable carbohydrates because peNDF is positively associated with chewing activity, ruminal pH, and milk fat content (Mertens, 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mertens, 1997 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationOpposing effects could explain the observed lack of effect of kernel processing on dry matter intake.
“Perhaps these opposing effects could explain the observed lack of effect of kernel processing on DMI, as suggested by Ferraretto and Shaver (2012b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMaturity at harvest alters yield, nutrient composition, digestibility, and ensiling potential of crops.
“Maturity at harvest alters yield, nutrient composition, digestibility, and ensiling potential of crops (Buxton and O'Kiely, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buxton and O'Kiely, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGreater ruminal pH and retention time is often reported for long particles, which could enhance NDF digestibility.
“Greater ruminal pH and retention time is often reported for long particles (Allen, 1997), which could enhance NDF digestibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen, 1997 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDuring maturation of the corn plant, sugars in kernels are converted to starch, and the DM content of kernels increases.
“During maturation of the corn plant, sugars in kernels are converted to starch, and the DM content of kernels increases (Allen et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLonger particle length would stimulate chewing and maintain short dietary fractions (i.e., concentrate feeds) entrapped in the rumen mat.
“Under these circumstances, longer particle length would stimulate chewing and maintain short dietary fractions (i.e., concentrate feeds) entrapped in the rumen mat (Allen et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allen et al., 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs corn crop maturity progresses, the proportion of DM contributed by kernels increases and the proportion contributed by stover decreases.
“As the corn crop maturity progresses, most changes are associated with the extent of kernel development, which alters the proportion of DM contributed by its various fractions-typically, increased proportion of kernels and reduced proportions of stover (stalk, leaves, and husk; Buxton and O'Kiely, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buxton and O'Kiely, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAltering harvest parameters from conventional whole-plant corn silage to increased cutting height, earlage or snaplage with an ear-snapping header, or toplage will reduce the total amount of material passing through the machine at similar cutting widths and speeds.
“From a machinery operation perspective, altering the harvest parameters from conventional WPCS to increased cutting height, earlage or snaplage with an ear-snapping header, or the new toplage will reduce the total amount of material passing through the machine at similar cutting widths and speeds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningOperators will be able to maintain the ton per hour of DM harvested by the machine by increasing ground speed.
“Operators will be able to maintain the ton per hour of DM harvested by the machine by increasing ground speed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWell-fermented snaplage may have a high starch digestibility, and diets may need a source of starch with lower digestibility such as dry corn to maintain normal milk fat concentrations.
“Results suggest that well-fermented snaplage may have a high starch digestibility, and diets may need a source of starch with lower digestibility such as dry corn to maintain normal milk fat concentrations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPartial replacement of snaplage with dry ground shelled corn alleviated the depression in milk fat percentage, with snaplage plus dry corn being 0.12 percentage units higher than snaplage alone, but still 0.15 percentage units lower than rolled high-moisture shelled corn.
“Partial replacement of snaplage with dry ground shelled corn alleviated the depression in milk fat percentage with SPDC being 0.12 percentage units higher than SNAP, but still 0.15 percentage units lower than RHMC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Akins and Shaver, 2014 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncreased quantities of high-cut whole-plant corn silage forage could be included in the total mixed ration, rather than corn grain being added to the diet, providing an economic benefit to implementing increased cutting heights.
“Also, increased quantities of high-cut WPCS forage could be included in the TMR, rather than corn grain being added to the diet, providing an economic benefit to implementing increased cutting heights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningCorn shredlage increased ruminal in situ starch digestibility and total-tract starch digestibility in both trials.
“Furthermore, SHRD increased ruminal in situ starch digestibility (Table 6) and TTSD in both trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vanderwerff et al., 2015 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncreased ground speed during harvest will have a positive effect on harvest efficiency while maintaining feed quality.
“Increased ground speed during harvest will have a positive effect on harvest efficiency (i.e., time required to harvest) while maintaining feed quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationYields of DM were 72 to 77% of the yield produced by whole-plant corn silage harvest, but starch concentration was greater for toplage than for whole-plant corn silage (43.0 vs. 33.9% of DM).
“Yields of DM were 72 to 77% of the yield produced by WPCS harvest, but starch concentration was greater for toplage than for WPCS (43.0 vs. 33.9% of DM).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nigon et al., 2016 source
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationMilk yields were similar among the rolled high-moisture shelled corn, snaplage, and snaplage plus dry corn diets, averaging 39.4 kg/d.
“Milk yields were similar, averaging 39.4 kg/d.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Akins and Shaver, 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhen fed in rations for lactating dairy cows, a greater proportion of long stover particles can increase the physically effective NDF content of the ration, which is important for proper rumen function, cow health, and milk fat content.
“When fed in rations for lactating dairy cows, this can increase the peNDF content of the ration, which is important for proper rumen function, cow health, and milk fat content (Mertens, 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mertens, 1997 source
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningComponent-corrected milk yields were similar among diets, resulting in higher feed efficiency for both snaplage diets (1.57 and 1.62) compared with rolled high-moisture shelled corn (1.46).
“Componentcorrected milk yields were also similar, resulting in higher feed efficiency (kg of milk/kg of DMI) for both SNAP (1.57) and SPDC (1.62) compared with RHMC (1.46).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Akins and Shaver, 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDry matter content of harvested whole-plant corn silage was well correlated with the output of the near-infrared spectrometer, and other parameters could be accurately assessed with calibration of the spectrometer.
“Dry matter content of the harvested WPCS was well correlated with the output of the NIRS, and other parameters could be accurately assessed with calibration of the spectrometer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Welle et al., 2003 source
The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe improved intake and milk production with alkali-treated whole-plant corn silage and fractionated whole-plant corn silage are likely related to improved total-tract NDF digestibility for alkali-treated whole-plant corn silage.
“These results are likely related to improved total-tract NDF digestibility for alkali-treated WPCS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSnaplage harvest allows for an earlier corn harvest, which proceeds more rapidly, with kernel processing done in the harvester rather than at the silo as done with rolled high-moisture shelled corn.
“This allows for an earlier corn harvest, which proceeds more rapidly, with kernel processing done in the harvester rather than at the silo as done with RHMC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe snaplage containing diets contained 26 to 27% starch, whereas the rolled high-moisture shelled corn diet contained 24% starch (DM basis), which could also contribute to the reduced milk fat content.
“The snaplage containing diets (SNAP and SPDC) contained 26 to 27% starch, whereas RHMC contained 24% starch (DM basis), which could also contribute to the reduced milk fat content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Akins and Shaver, 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLaboratory and in-field tests showed the capability to predict moisture content of harvested crops, but moisture content at different harvest locations were not well predicted, indicating the need for local calibration of the near-infrared spectrometer sensor.
“Laboratory and in-field tests showed the capability to predict moisture content of the harvested crops, but moisture content at different harvest locations (e.g., Wisconsin versus Arizona) were not well predicted, indicating the need for local calibration of the NIRS sensor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Digman and Shinners, 2008 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDespite the greater amount of coarse particles for corn shredlage than conventional-processed whole-plant corn silage, measurements of weigh-backs during both trials indicated minimal sorting and no differences in sorting among treatments.
“Despite the greater amount of coarse particles for SHRD than CPCS, measurements of weigh-backs during both trials indicated minimal sorting and no differences in sorting among treatments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ferraretto and Shaver, 2012a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vanderwerff et al., 2015 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMilk fat yield, milk protein concentration, and milk protein yield were unaffected by the treatments.
“Milk fat yield, milk protein concentration, and milk protein yield were unaffected by the treatments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Akins and Shaver, 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationX-ray technology was implemented and proven effective at measuring DM yield and foreign object detection; however, safety concerns are a limiting factor.
“Recently, X-ray technology was implemented and proven effective at measuring DM yield and foreign object detection; however, safety concerns are a limiting factor (Wild et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wild et al., 2015 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe impact plate and feed-roll displacement sensor were both well correlated with mass-flow rate through the harvester in whole-plant corn.
“Findings indicated the impact plate and feed-roll displacement sensor were both well correlated with mass-flow rate through the harvester in whole-plant corn.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martel and Savoie, 2000
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDias Junior et al. (2016) proposed a novel laboratory procedure to measure kernel fragmentation based on the hydrodynamic separation method of Savoie et al. (2004) in combination with dry-sieving and geometric mean particle size calculation.
“Dias Junior et al. ( 2016) proposed a novel laboratory procedure to measure kernel fragmentation based on the hydrodynamic separation method of Savoie et al. (2004) in combination with dry-sieving and geometric mean particle size calculation (ASABE, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dias Junior et al. (2016)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Savoie et al. (2004) source
- cites ASABE, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFerreira and Mertens (2005) defined a corn silage fragmentation index (corn silage processing score; CSPS) that provides producers and nutritionists a metric for determining the effectiveness of crop processing rolls during harvest.
“Ferreira and Mertens (2005) defined a corn silage fragmentation index (corn silage processing score; CSPS) that provides producers and nutritionists a metric for determining the effectiveness of crop processing rolls during harvest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferreira and Mertens (2005) source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe WI-OS method may limit human error but requires a heavy (>225 kg) and large (102 × 64 × 145 cm) piece of equipment, which precludes its use on-farm.
“Although this method may limit human error, it requires a heavy (>225 kg) and large (102 × 64 × 145 cm, length × width × height) piece of equipment, which precludes its use on-farm (Maulfair and Heinrichs, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maulfair and Heinrichs, 2012 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGuidelines commonly used for CSPS suggest a sample with greater than 70% being optimal processing, 50 to 69% being sufficient processing, and below 50% being suboptimal processing.
“Guidelines commonly used for CSPS suggest a sample with greater than 70% being optimal processing, 50 to 69% being sufficient processing, and below 50% being suboptimal processing (Shinners and Holmes, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shinners and Holmes, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBreaking the corn kernels increases digestibility and available starch, which in turn improve milk production and feed efficiency by dairy cows.
“Breaking the corn kernels increases digestibility and available starch, which in turn improve milk production and feed efficiency by dairy cows.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKononoff et al. (2003a) modified the PSPS method and assessed the effect of moisture content of the TMR when analyzed.
“Kononoff et al. (2003a) modified this method and assessed the effect of moisture content of the TMR when analyzed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kononoff et al. (2003a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA strong relationship (R2 = 0.62) between the PSPS and the WI-OS procedures to determine mean particle length in whole-plant corn silage was observed, suggesting that mean particle length can be measured adequately on-farm with the PSPS.
“A strong relationship (R 2 = 0.62) between the PSPS and the WI-OS procedures to determine MPL in WPCS was observed by Salvati et al. (2015), suggesting that MPL can be measured adequately on-farm with the PSPS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Salvati et al. (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMaturity at harvest remains an important factor in silage production, because negative effects of late maturity on nutrient digestibility are not offset by modern hybrids.
“Maturity at harvest remains an important factor in silage production, because negative effects of late maturity on nutrient digestibility are not offset by modern hybrids.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningUtilizing image analysis techniques for determination of particle size distribution of the kernel portion of whole-plant corn silage in-field during harvest could provide information about the performance of the crop-processing rolls.
“Therefore, utilizing image analysis techniques for determination of particle size distribution of the kernel portion of WPCS in-field during harvest could provide information about the performance of the crop-processing rolls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe hydrodynamic separation method was effective at separating grain from stover in fresh whole-plant corn silage, but drying the samples before water separation yielded a more complete separation.
“This method was effective at separating grain from stover in fresh WPCS, but drying the WPCS samples before water separation yielded a more complete separation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Savoie et al. (2004) source
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMultiple types of processing rolls exist, and roll surface geometry and machine settings change the physical characteristics of whole-plant corn silage.
“Multiple types of processing rolls exist, and roll surface geometry and machine settings change the physical characteristics of the WPCS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIncorporation of outer surface area measurements in chopped forage may enhance the understanding of fiber digestibility and effectiveness in dairy cattle diets.
“Incorporation of outer surface area measurements in chopped forage may enhance the understanding of fiber digestibility and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe standard method accepted by agricultural engineers for determination of mean particle length of chopped forages is the Wisconsin Oscillating Particle Separator (WI-OS).
“Alternatively, the standard method accepted by agricultural engineers for determination of MPL of chopped forages is the Wisconsin Oscillating Particle Separator (WI-OS; S424.1, ASABE, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites S424.1, ASABE, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFerreira and Mertens (2005) suggested that CSPS represents the proportion of kernels that are broken into at least one-fourth of a kernel.
“Ferreira and Mertens (2005) suggested that CSPS represents the proportion of kernels that are broken into at least onefourth of a kernel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ferreira and Mertens (2005) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningImplementing the image-analysis method in a usable format, such as a smartphone application, would provide the capability of crop processor performance assessment in-field without the need for sieve analysis.
“Implementing this method in a usable format, such as a smartphone application, would provide the capability of crop processor performance assessment in-field without the need for sieve analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe efficacy of kernel processing in whole-plant corn silage is variable and can be influenced by several factors.
“As mentioned, the efficacy of kernel processing in WPCS is variable and can be influenced by several factors; thus, methods to evaluate the adequacy of kernel processing in WPCS are critical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHeinrichs (2013) suggested the 4-mm sieve retains small forage particles with potential high fiber concentration and is representative of particles typically entrapped in the ruminal mat but could be easily digested.
“Heinrichs (2013) suggested this novel sieve retains small forage particles with potential high fiber concentration and is representative of particles typically entrapped in the ruminal mat but could be easily digested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heinrichs, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe 1.18-mm sieve was replaced with a 4-mm sieve.
“Recently, the 1.18-mm sieve was replaced with a 4-mm sieve (Heinrichs, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heinrichs, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe CSPS methodology is widely used in the dairy industry and utilizes sieves to separate the corn kernels from the plant material in a vertical shaker.
“This methodology is widely used in the dairy industry and utilizes sieves to separate the corn kernels from the plant material in a vertical shaker.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenImprovements of current laboratory methods may enhance modeling of starch digestibility and physically effective neutral detergent fiber in whole-plant corn silage.
“In addition, improvements of current laboratory methods may enhance modeling of starch digestibility and peNDF in WPCS and further research is warranted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenWhole-plant corn silage has been shown to be an effective feed for dairy cattle.
“Whole-plant corn silage has been shown to be an effective feed for dairy cattle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough longer theoretical length of cut of the plant portion of whole-plant corn silage provides benefit to rumen health in dairy cows, benefits on lactation performance are minimal.
“Although longer TLOC of the plant portion of the WPCS provides benefit to rumen health in dairy cows, benefits on lactation performance are minimal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationFurther application of image analysis technology for real-time assessment could eliminate sieving analysis and enhance the process of silage harvesting.
“In addition, further application of this technology for realtime assessment could eliminate sieving analysis and enhance the process of silage harvesting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVariation in mean particle length may also be influenced by knife sharpness and knife to shear bar clearance, ratio of kernel to stover, and maturity at harvest.
“Variation in MPL may also be influenced by knife sharpness and knife to shear bar clearance (Shinners, 2003), ratio of kernel to stover (Mertens, 2005), and maturity at harvest (Shinners et al., 2000;Johnson et al., 2002a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Shinners, 2003 source
- cites Mertens, 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Shinners et al., 2000; Johnson et al., 2002a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA guide for on-farm implementation of the hydrodynamic separation method was developed by Shinners and Holmes (2013).
“A guide for on-farm implementation of this hydrodynamic separation method was developed by Shinners and Holmes (2013) and its adoption by dairy farmers, nutritionists, and custom harvesters is advised.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shinners and Holmes (2013)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBy using these real-time techniques, any errors in the crop processing roll adjustment could be corrected during harvest to maintain feed quality and harvest efficiency.
“By using these real-time techniques, any errors in the crop processing roll adjustment could be corrected during harvest to maintain feed quality and harvest efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIt is well established that processing whole-plant corn silage during harvest with counter-rotating rolls reduces the particle size of the kernel fraction contained within.
“It is well established that processing the WPCS during harvest with counter-rotating rolls reduces the particle size of the kernel fraction contained within.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Whole-plant corn silage has become the predominant forage used in dairy cattle diets worldwide.
“Whole-plant corn silage (WPCS) has become the predominant forage used in dairy cattle diets worldwide.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A review of research trials describing and summarizing findings on recent technological advancements for corn silage harvesting is unavailable.
“Although these developments have garnered a lot of interest by dairy farmers and corn growers, a review of research trials describing and summarizing these findings is unavailable.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The forage component of lactating dairy cow diets is fed primarily to provide adequate physically effective NDF.
“The forage component of lactating dairy cow diets is fed primarily to provide adequate peNDF.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Experiments evaluating the effects of replacing whole-plant corn silage or high-cut whole-plant corn silage with toplage in dairy cattle diets are unavailable in the literature.
“To our knowledge, experiments evaluating the effects of replacing WPCS or high-cut WPCS with toplage in dairy cattle diets are unavailable in the literature.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Optimal kernel processing can be achieved regardless of the type of chopper or processor used.
“Optimal kernel processing can be achieved regardless of the type of chopper or processor used.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The use of a single sieve to determine degree of kernel processing assumes that all particles passing through this sieve are equal.
“The use of a single sieve to determine degree of kernel processing leads to the assumption that all particles passing through this sieve are equal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Manipulation of theoretical length of cut at harvest is a common practice in an attempt to improve physically effective neutral detergent fiber of whole-plant corn silage.
“Manipulation of TLOC at harvest is a common practice in an attempt to improve peNDF of WPCS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Visual evaluation of kernel breakage at harvest is drastically improved by the absence of the stover fraction.
“Visual evaluation of kernel breakage at harvest is drastically improved by the absence of the stover fraction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Assessment of whole-plant corn physical properties during harvest provides farmers, nutritionists, and custom harvesters the ability to check the forage harvester settings to ensure high silage quality is achieved and consistency is maintained.
“Assessment of whole-plant corn physical properties during harvest provides farmers, nutritionists, and custom harvesters the ability to check the forage harvester settings to ensure high silage quality is achieved and consistency is maintained.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reductions in lactic acid content cause an increase in pH, triggering the degradation of the ensiled material.
“Reductions on lactic acid contents causes an increase in pH, triggering the degradation of the ensiled material [3,6].”
From The Effects of Short-Time Delayed Sealing on Fermentation, Aerobic Stability and Chemical Composition on Maize Silages (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
Cites
Estimación lineal de los requerimientos nutricionales del NRC para ganado de leche.
Elizondo-Salazar, J. A. (2014) · Agronomía Mesoamericana · doi:10.15517/am.v13i1.13244 · Cited by 6,497 · see citing works
Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle
National Research Council (2001) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9825 · Cited by 5,951 · see citing works
Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows
Mertens, D. R. (1997) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76075-2 · Cited by 1,467 · see citing works
Allen, M. S. (1997) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76074-0 · Cited by 889 · see citing works
(2003) · Agronomy Monographs · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr42 · Cited by 881 · see citing works
Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of ruminal function
Mertens, D. R. (1987) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1987.6451548x · Cited by 721 · see citing works
Allen, M. S., Bradford, B. J., & Oba, M. (2009) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2009-1779 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?
Russell, J. B., & Wilson, D. B. (1996) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76510-4 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen
McAllister, T. A., Bae, H. D., Jones, G. A., & Cheng, K.-J. (1994) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1994.72113004x · Cited by 617 · see citing works
A simple method for the analysis of particle sizes of forage and total mixed rations
Lammers, B. P., Buckmaster, D. R., & Heinrichs, A. J. (1996) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76442-1 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Kononoff, P. J., Heinrichs, A. J., & Buckmaster, D. R. (2003) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73773-4 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Shape identification and particles size distribution from basic shape parameters using ImageJ
Igathinathane, C., Pordesimo, L. O., Columbus, E. P., et al. (2008) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2008.02.007 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Effect of quantity, quality and length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows
Leonardi, C., & Armentano, L. E. (2003) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73634-0 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Relationship between corn vitreousness and ruminal in situ starch degradability
Correa, C. E. S., Shaver, R. D., Pereira, M. N., Lauer, J. G., & Kohn, K. (2002) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74386-5 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationParticle size distribution analysis of coarse aggregate using digital image processing
Mora, C. F., Kwan, A. K. H., & Chan, H. C. (1998) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/s0008-8846(98)00043-x · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Kononoff, P. J., Heinrichs, A. J., & Lehman, H. A. (2003) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73937-x · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Starch Hydrolysis by the Ruminal Microflora ,
Kotarski, S. F., KWaniska, R. D., & Thurn, K. K. (1992) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/122.1.178 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Bal, M. A., Shaver, R. D., Jirovec, A. G., Shinners, K. J., & Coors, J. G. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74993-9 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnson, L., Harrison, J. H., Hunt, C., Shinners, K., Doggett, C. G., & Sapienza, D. (1999) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75540-2 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Influence of genotype and stage of maturity of maize on rate of ruminal starch degradation
Philippeau, C., & Michalet-Doreau, B. (1997) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(97)00042-4 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Sieveless particle size distribution analysis of particulate materials through computer vision
Igathinathane, C., Pordesimo, L. O., Columbus, E. P., et al. (2009) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2009.01.005 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Preharvest Plant Factors Affecting Ensiling
(2003) · Agronomy monograph/Agronomy · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr42.c5 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Hunt, C. W., Kezar, W. W., & Vinande, R. (1992) · jpa · doi:10.2134/jpa1992.0286 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Effects of cutting height and maturity on the nutritive value of corn silage for lactating cows
Neylon, J. M., & Kung, L. (2003) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73806-5 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Johnson, L., Harrison, J. H., Davidson, D. L., Robutti, J. L., Swift, M. L., Mahanna, W. C., & Shinners, K. J. (2002) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74143-x · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Weiss, W. P., & Wyatt, D. J. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74886-7 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Ferraretto, L. F., & SHAVER, R. D. (2015) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2014-9045 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationFerraretto, L. F., & Shaver, R. D. (2012) · The Professional Animal Scientist · doi:10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30334-x · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationSchwab, E. C., Shaver, R. D., Shinners, K. J., Lauer, J. G., & Coors, J. G. (2002) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74115-5 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationForage yield and quality of corn cultivars developed in different eras
Lauer, J. G., Coors, J. G., & Flannery, P. J. (2001) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2001.4151449x · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Chemical and physical characteristics of corn silages and their effects on in vitro disappearance
Ferreira, G., & Mertens, D. R. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73128-3 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Kung, L., Moulder, B. M., Mulrooney, C. N., Teller, R. S., & Schmidt, R. J. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0236 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Bal, M. A., Shaver, R. D., Shinners, K. J., Coors, J. G., Lauer, J. G., Straub, R. J., & Koegel, R. G. (2000) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(00)00163-2 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationInfluence of volume/mass on grain-size curves and conversion of image-analysis size to sieve size
Fernlund, J. M. R., Zimmerman, R. W., & Kragic, D. (2007) · Engineering Geology · doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.12.007 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Johnson, L. M., Harrison, J. H., Davidson, D., Mahanna, W. C., & Shinners, K. (2003) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73601-7 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Hunt, C. W., Kezar, W., & Vinande, R. (1989) · Journal of Production Agriculture · doi:10.2134/jpa1989.0357 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Hybrid, maturity, and cutting height interactions on corn forage yield and quality
Lewis, A. L., Cox, W. J., & Cherney, J. H. (2004) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2004.2670 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Ebling, T. L., & Kung, L. (2004) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73376-7 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Johnson, L., Harrison, J. H., Davidson, D. L., Mahanna, W. C., & Shinners, K. J. (2003) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73607-8 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Corn Silage Hybrid Effects on Intake, Digestion, and Milk Production by Dairy Cows
Bal, M. A., Shaver, R. D., Al-Jobeile, H., Coors, J. G., & Lauer, J. G. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)75185-x · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnson, L. M., Harrison, J. H., Davidson, D., Swift, M., Mahanna, W. C., & Shinners, K. (2002) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74379-8 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Arriola, K. G., Kim, S. C., Huisden, C. M., & Adesogan, A. T. (2012) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4524 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Near-infrared spectroscopy on chopper to measure maize forage quality parameters online
Welle, R., Greten, W., Rietmann, B., Alley, S., Sinnaeve, G., & Dardenne, P. (2003) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.1407 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Influence of mechanical processing on utilization of corn silage by lactating dairy cows
Dhiman, T. R., Bal, M. A., Wu, Z., Moreira, V. R., Shaver, R. D., Satter, L. D., Shinners, K. J., & Walgenbach, R. P. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)75144-7 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationDesign and evaluation of a corn silage harvester using shredding and flail cutting
Zhang, M., Sword, M. L., Buckmaster, D. R., & Cauffman, G. R. (2003) · Transactions of the ASAE · doi:10.13031/2013.15633 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Effect of Corn Shredlage on lactation performance and total tract starch digestibility by dairy cows
Ferraretto, L. F., & SHAVER, R. D. (2012) · The Professional Animal Scientist · doi:10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30423-x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationFerraretto, L. F., Crump, P. M., & SHAVER, R. D. (2015) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9511 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationProcessing whole-plant corn silage with crop processing rolls on a pull-type forage harvester
Shinners, K. J., Jirovec, A. G., Shaver, R. D., & Bal, M. (2000) · Applied Engineering in Agriculture · doi:10.13031/2013.5214 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationThe influence of ageing on cell wall composition and degradability of three maize genotypes
Cone, J. W., & Engels, F. M. (1993) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/0377-8401(93)90062-o · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Effect of length of cut and kernel processing on use of corn silage by lactating dairy cows
Cooke, K. M., & Bernard, J. K. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72689-8 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Bernard, J. K., West, J. W., Trammell, D. S., & Cross, G. H. (2004) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)70037-5 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Relationship between processing score and kernel-fraction particle size in whole-plant corn silage
Dias, G. S., Ferraretto, L. F., Salvati, G. G. S., de Resende, L. C., Hoffman, P. C., Pereira, M. N., & SHAVER, R. D. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10411 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationEngineering Principles of Silage Harvesting Equipment
Shinners, K. J. (2003) · Agronomy Monographs · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr42.c8 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Review: Methods to measure forage and diet particle size in the dairy cow
Maulfair, D. D., & Heinrichs, A. J. (2012) · The Professional Animal Scientist · doi:10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30396-x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Evaluation of a crop processor in a pull-type forage harvester
Roberge, M., Savoie, P., & Norris, E. R. (1998) · Transactions of the ASAE · doi:10.13031/2013.17254 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Brown midrib corn shredlage in diets for high-producing dairy cows
Vanderwerff, L. M., Ferraretto, L. F., & Shaver, R. D. (2015) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9543 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationEffect of corn snaplage on lactation performance by dairy cows
Akins, M. S., & Shaver, R. D. (2014) · The Professional Animal Scientist · doi:10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30088-7 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationNgonyamo-Majee, D., Shaver, R. D., Coors, J. G., Sapienza, D., & Lauer, J. G. (2009) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.02.002 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationHydrodynamic separation of grain and stover components in corn silage
Savoie, P., Shinners, K. J., & Binversie, B. N. (2004) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/abab:113:1-3:041 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Aoki, Y., OSHITA, T., Namekawa, H., Nemoto, E., & Aoki, M. (2013) · Grassland Science · doi:10.1111/grs.12033 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Real-time moisture measurement on a forage harvester using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy
Digman, M. F., & Shinners, K. J. (2008) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.25295 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
(2000) · Canadian agricultural engineering · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Management and Assessment of Ensiled Forages and High-Moisture Grain
Seglar, W. J., & SHAVER, R. D. (2014) · Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2014.07.002 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationOuellet, D. R., Lapierre, H., & Chiquette, J. (2003) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73973-3 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Ehlert, D. (2002) · Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1006/bioe.2002.0101 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Arriola, K. G., Kim, S. C., Staples, C. R., & Adesogan, A. T. (2012) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4526 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Harvester modifications to alter composition and dry matter of corn-silage
(2016) · Applied Engineering in Agriculture · doi:10.13031/aea.32.11417 · Cited by 13 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…that well-fermented snaplage may have a high starch digestibility, and diets may need a source of starch with lower Summary of 7 studies: Neylon and Kung (2003), Bernard et al. (2004), Lewis et al. (2004), Kung et al. (2008), Aoki et al. (2013), Nigon et al. (2016), Ferraretto et al. (2017).”
BackgroundCook, D. E., Bender, R. W., Shinners, K. J., & Combs, D. K. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10402 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Length Distribution and Other Dimensional Parameters of Chopped Forage by Image Analysis
(2014) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/trans.57.10665 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
(2014) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
(2015) · 2015 ASABE International Meeting · doi:10.13031/aim.20152189703 · Cited by 3
PROCESSING WILTED ALFALFA WITH CROP PROCESSING ROLLS ON A PULL-TYPE FORAGE HARVESTER
Shinners, K. J., Jirovec, A. G., Shaver, R. D., & Bal, M. (2000) · Applied Engineering in Agriculture · doi:10.13031/2013.5215
Self-citationCannayen, I., Pordesimo, L. O., & Batchelor, W. D. (2008) · 2008 Providence, Rhode Island, June 29 - July 2, 2008 · doi:10.13031/2013.25040
HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATION OF GRAIN AND STOVER COMPONENTS IN CORN SILAGE
Savoie, P., Shinners, K. J., & Binversie, B. N. (n.d.) · 2003, Las Vegas, NV July 27-30, 2003 · doi:10.13031/2013.15402
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Ferraretto, 2015, Effect of ensiling on kernel processing score in whole-plant corn silage harvested with varied processors and settings, J. Dairy Sci., 98, 689
- Ferraretto, 2017, Influence of plant population, hybrid relative maturity and cutting height on yield, nutrient content and digestibility in whole-plant corn forage, J. Dairy Sci., 100, 150
- Mertens, D. R. 2005. Particle size, fragmentation index, and effective fiber: Tools for evaluating the physical attributes of corn silages. Pages 211–220 in Proc. Four-State Dairy Nutr. Mgmt. Conf., Dubuque, IA.
- Salvati, G. G. S., L. F. Ferraretto, G. S. Dias Junior, and R. D. Shaver. 2015. Relationship between theoretical length of cut and mean particle length in whole-plant corn silage. Pages 158–159 in Proc. XVII International Silage Conference, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo (ESALQ), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
- Saxton, 1998, A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in PROC MIXED, 1243
- Shinners, 2013, Making sure your kernel processor is doing its job, Focus on Forage, 15, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Silage review: Silage feeding management: Silage characteristics and dairy cow feeding behavior
Grant, R. J., & Ferraretto, L. F. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13729 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“A comprehensive review of these factors may be found in companion articles in this special issue (refer to Ferraretto et al., 2018; Kung et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAssessment of maize yield and phenology by drone-mounted superspectral camera
Herrmann, I., Bdolach, E., Montekyo, Y., Rachmilevitch, S., Townsend, P. A., & Karnieli, A. (2019) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-019-09659-5 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Formic Acid as an Antimicrobial for Poultry Production: A Review
Ricke, S. C., Dittoe, D. K., & Richardson, K. E. (2020) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00563 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Ma, C., Zhang, S., Lü, J., Zhang, C., Pang, X., & Lv, J. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20092073 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“Silage is fermented and high-moisture stored fodder that was widely used to fed to ruminants [19].”
BackgroundFerrero, F., Tabacco, E., Piano, S., Casale, M., & Borreani, G. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-18733 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Review on Bioenergy Storage Systems for Preserving and Improving Feedstock Value
Wendt, L. M., & Zhao, H. Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00370 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Yield and nutritional value of BRS Capiaçu grass at different regrowth ages
Monção, F. P., Costa, M. A. M. S., Rigueira, J. P. S., et al. (2019) · Semina Ciências Agrárias · doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2019v40n5p2045 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Dong, J., Li, S., Chen, X., Sun, Z., Sun, Y., Zhen, Y., Qin, G., Wang, T., Aschalew, N. D., & Zhang, X. (2022) · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture · doi:10.1186/s40538-022-00326-y · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“period, the grain filling stage of maize increases, and more soluble sugar is transformed into starch, thereby increasing the starch content and decreasing neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents in whole-crop corn silage [32, 33].”
BackgroundBai, C., Wang, C., Sun, L., Xu, H., Jiang, Y., Na, N., Yin, G., Liu, S., & Xue, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.663895 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Fan, C., Zhang, D., Li, Y., et al. (2023) · Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.10.017 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Effects of Corn Varieties and Moisture Content on Mechanical Properties of Corn
Zhu, X., Chi, R., & Ma, Y. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13020545 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Wang, B., Gao, R., Wu, Z., & Yu, Z. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00641 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
da Silva, É. B., Costa, D. M., Santos, E. M., Moyer, K. Z., Hellings, E., & Kung, L. (2021) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-20111 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Guan, H., Ran, Q., Li, H., & Zhang, X. (2021) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation7040258 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Liu, X., Wang, A., Zhu, L., Guo, W., Guo, X., Zhu, B., & Yang, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1330538 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“In recent years, the development of whole-plant corn silage (WPCS) on a large scale has greatly promoted the utilization of corn stover for animal feed production (Ferraretto et al., 2018; Cui et al., 2022).”
BackgroundGuo, X., Guo, W., Yang, M., Sun, Y., Wang, Y., Yan, Y., & Zhu, B. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10050978 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Xin, Y., Chen, C., Zhong, Y., Bu, X., Huang, S., Tahir, M., Du, Z., Liu, W., Yang, W., Li, J., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1090401 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“, 2013), and has become the main feed for dairy cows worldwide (Ferraretto et al., 2018).”
BackgroundHorst, E. H., López, S., Neumann, M., Giráldez, F. J., & Bumbieris, V. H. (2020) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture10070251 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“, the grain), as demonstrated in a number of studies [1,2,23].”
BackgroundFault diagnosis of silage harvester based on a modified random forest
Zhou, X., Xu, X., Zhang, J., et al. (2022) · Information Processing in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.inpa.2022.02.005 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Jaipolsaen, N., Sangsritavong, S., Uengwetwanit, T., Angthong, P., Plengvidhya, V., Rungrassamee, W., & Yammuen-art, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.784535 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“) has been used worldwide and has become an important feed due to its high digestible nutrients and protein efficiency (Ferraretto et al., 2018).”
BackgroundKoakoski, D. L., Bordin, T., Cavallini, D., & Buonaiuto, G. (2024) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation10080398 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Li, J., Li, Z., Shang, S., Zhao, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, X., Bai, J., Yang, Z., & Guo, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1251946 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Wang, C., Han, H., Sun, L., Na, N., Xu, H., Chang, S., Jiang, Y., & Xue, Y. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9050900 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“In recent decades, whole-plant corn silage has become the predominant forage for the global dairy industry [6].”
BackgroundFermentative profile of maize silage inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri
da Silva, L. D., Pereira, O. G., Roseira, J. P. S., Agarussi, M. C. N., da Silva, V. P., & da Silva, T. C. (2019) · Revista de Ciências Agrarias - Amazon Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences · doi:10.22491/rca.2019.2924 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Htet, M. N. S., Wang, H., Yadav, V., Sompouviseth, T., & Feng, B. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14106022 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Furthermore, DM had a positive relationship with FC in studying the effects of different additives on the quality of silages fermented from various animal forage crops [56].”
BackgroundSalvati, G. G. S., dos Santos, W. P., Silveira, J. M., Gritti, V. C., Arthur, B. A. V., Salvo, P. A. R., Fachin, L. C., Ribeiro, A. P., Júnior, N. N. M., Ferraretto, L. F., et al. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-19428 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of hybrid and maturity on the conservation and nutritive value of snaplage
Gusmão, J., Lima, L. M., Ferraretto, L. F., Casagrande, D. R., & Bernardes, T. F. (2021) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114899 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationServa, L., Marchesini, G., Chinello, M., Contiero, B., Tenti, S., Mirisola, M., Grandis, D., & Andrighetto, I. (2021) · Italian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1080/1828051x.2021.1918028 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…of the most important (Grant and Adesogan 2018) and is characterised by a great variability both in composition and fermentation quality (Grant and Ferraretto 2018; Marchesini et al. 2019), which if not adequate, could reduce DM intake (DMI) and production (Gerlach et al. 2013) and lead to poor…”
BackgroundBueno, J. L., Bolson, D. C., Jacovaci, F. A., Gomes, A. L. M., Ribeiro, M. G., Bueno, A. V. I., Jobim, C. C., & Daniel, J. L. P. (2020) · Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia · doi:10.37496/rbz4920190247 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Pull-type forage harvesters typically result in poor kernel processing and, in turn, lower starch digestibility (Salvati et al., 2017; Ferraretto et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluence of soybean-crop proportion on the conservation of maize-soybean bi-crop silage
Parra, C. S., Bolson, D. C., Jacovaci, F. A., Nussio, L. G., Jobim, C. C., & Daniel, J. L. P. (2019) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114295 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Trailer hopper automatic detection method for silage harvesting based improved U-Net
Liu, L., Du, Y., Li, X., et al. (2022) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2022.107046 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Zhang, F., Fang, M., Wang, X., Lu, W., & Ma, C. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2019-0170 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Ensiling, which functions to markedly delay nutrient loss, improve palatability, and increase digestibility, is a preservation method that is suitable for most moist forage crops (Ferraretto et al. 2018).”
BackgroundMarchesini, G., Serva, L., Chinello, M., Gazziero, M., Tenti, S., Mirisola, M., Garbin, E., Contiero, B., Grandis, D., & Andrighetto, I. (2019) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/gfs.12438 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Factors determining yield and nutritive value of maize for silage under tropical conditions
Lima, L. M., Bastos, M. S., Ávila, C. L. D. S., Ferreira, D. D., Casagrande, D. R., & Bernardes, T. F. (2022) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/gfs.12575 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Agarussi, M. C. N., Pereira, O. G., da Silva, L. S., da Silva, V., de Paula, R. A., Silva, F. F. E., & Ribeiro, K. G. (2022) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture12010095 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Hollis, M., Pate, R. T., Mideros, S. X., Fellows, G. M., Akins, M. S., Murphy, M. R., & Cardoso, F. C. (2019) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114264 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
de Melo, N. N., Carvalho-Estrada, P. D. A., Tavares, Q. G., Pereira, L. D. M., Delai Vigne, G. L., Camargo Rezende, D. M. L., & Schmidt, P. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13010223 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Feasibility of Utilizing Biodegradable Plastic Film to Cover Corn Silage under Farm Conditions
Tabacco, E., Ferrero, F., & Borreani, G. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10082803 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Diepersloot, E. C., Heinzen, C., Saylor, B. A., & Ferraretto, L. F. (2022) · Translational Animal Science · doi:10.1093/tas/txac037 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationSaylor, B. A., McCary, C. L., Diepersloot, E. C., Heinzen, C., Pupo, M. R., Gusmão, J., Ghizzi, L. G., Sultana, H., & Ferraretto, L. F. (2021) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture11070574 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“In many cases, greater starch concentrations in mature maize plants will correspond to reduced concentrations of CP and NDF [3].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationZhang, X., Zhang, H., Wang, D., et al. (2025) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132544 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Maize Kernel Broken Rate Prediction Using Machine Vision and Machine Learning Algorithms
Fan, C., Wang, W., Cui, T., et al. (2024) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13244044 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“The breakage of corn kernels increases the risk of fungal damage, leading to a decline in both yield and quality [2,3].”
Gao, X., Hou, M. J., Fu, X. Y., et al. (2023) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2023.100906 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Godoi, L. A., Silva, B. C., Silva, F. A. S., Pucetti, P., Pacheco, M. V. C., de Souza, G. A. P., Lage, B. C., Rennó, L. N., Schoonmaker, J. P., & Filho, S. D. C. V. (2020) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114775 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Dong, J., Cui, T., Zhang, D., et al. (2024) · Powder Technology · doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2024.120297 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Effect of Different Additives on the Quality of Rehydrated Corn Grain Silage: A Systematic Review
Diogénes, L. V., Filho, J. M. P., Edvan, R. L., de Oliveira, J. P. F., do Nascimento, R. R., Santos, E. M., Alencar, E. J. S., Mazza, P., Oliveira, R. L., & Bezerra, L. R. (2023) · Ruminants · doi:10.3390/ruminants3040035 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“This solubilization contributes to releasing the starch associated with this protein, making it readily available for absorption in the animals’ intestines [66].”
da Silva, É. B., Polukis, S. A., Smith, M. L., Voshell, R. S., Leggett, M. J., Jones, P. B., & Kung, L. (2023) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2023-23672 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Snaplage comprises the corn kernels, cob, husk, and shank (Ferraretto et al., 2018), whereas HMC is produced with only the corn kernels, containing between 25 to 35% moisture (Hoffman and Muck, 2011).”
BackgroundGuo, Q., Hao, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, C., & Han, H. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10112369 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Pinheiro, D. T., Santos, D. M. S., Martins, A. R. R., da Silva, W. M., de Araújo, C. V., de Abreu, D. C., Hoshide, A. K., Molossi, L., & de Oliveira, R. A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132313325 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“5% lower than GY measured in two studies in Paraná state in southeastern Brazil during the 2002–2003 [51] and 2015–2016 [9] wet seasons, respectively.”
BackgroundAdvancements in the Research and Application of Whole-Plant Maize Silage for Feeding Purposes
Zhang, X., Liang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15131922 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“This represents an increase of approximately 32.07% compared to the digestibility achieved with only the Tween-80 pretreatment [21].”
Influentialde Toledo, A. F., Dantas, J. G., Barboza, R. D. F., Tomaluski, C. R., Oliveira, I. C. R., Carvalho, N. I., Marino, E. D., Polizel, D. M., Miller-Cushon, E. K., & Bittar, C. M. M. (2024) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2023-24138 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Corn silage is the most used forage for cows on dairy farms (Ferraretto et al., 2018).”
BackgroundCorn silage, a systematic review of the quality and yield in different regions around the world
García-Chávez, I., Meraz-Romero, E., Ortega, O. A. C., Zaragoza-Esparza, J., Osorio-Ávalos, J., Jimenez, L. E. R., & González-Ronquillo, M. (2022) · Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria · doi:10.21930/rcta.vol23_num3_art:2547 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…grains are converted into starch, and the DM content of the grains increases (Guyader et al., 2018); a delay in the harvest of the whole plant produces a higher concentration of starch and a low decrease in the concentrations of CP, NDF, EE, and ashes (Amodu et al., 2014; Ferraretto et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialServa, L., Magrin, L., Marchesini, G., & Andrighetto, I. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12040774 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“These data can be used by farmers and maize growers to make better processing choices at the time of harvest and when processing the whole maize plant into the silos [11,12].”
Azar, İ., & Kumral, N. A. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B · doi:10.1080/03601234.2022.2029275 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Wang, W., Yang, X. H., Li, J., Dong, Z., Zhao, J., Shao, T., & Yuan, X. (2021) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.11696 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Saylor, B. A., Diepersloot, E. C., Heinzen, C., McCary, C. L., & Ferraretto, L. F. (2021) · JDS Communications · doi:10.3168/jdsc.2021-0093 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Although it is well known that the presence of intact kernels in corn silage reduces starch digestibility (Ferraretto et al., 2018), the extent to which proteolysis occurs in whole kernels during ensiling requires further investigation.”
BackgroundSelf-citationEffect of sealing strategy on the feeding value of corn silage for growing dairy heifers
Parra, C. S., Bragatto, J. M., Filho, F. A. P., Silva, S. M. S., Tuzzi, B. F., Jobim, C. C., & Daniel, J. L. P. (2021) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-19895 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
De Almeida Araújo, C., Santos, A. P. M. D., Monteiro, C. C. D. F., Lima, D. O., Torres, A. M., Santos, C. V. S. D., Monteiro, S. E. D. S., & Silva, J. J. D. (2020) · Diversitas Journal · doi:10.17648/diversitas-journal-v5i1-1035 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Rapid pH Value Detection in Secondary Fermentation of Maize Silage Using Hyperspectral Imaging
Yu, Y., Tian, H., Zhao, K., et al. (2024) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy14061204 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Whole-plant flint corn silage inclusion in total mixed rations for pre- and postweaning dairy calves
de Toledo, A. F., Dondé, S. C., Silva, A. P., Cezar, A. M., Coelho, M. G., Tomaluski, C. R., Júnior, G. F. V., Costa, J. H. C., & Bittar, C. M. M. (2023) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2023-23494 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Comparison of Crushing Effect of Differently Shaped Crushing Rollers on Whole-Plant Silage Maize
Mu, X., Li, H., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Geng, D., & Zhu, J. (2023) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture13071276 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“However, in the harvesting process of corn silage, different crushing roller types have different effects on the silking and crushing of silage, which will affect its subsequent fermentation and eventually the ingestion, digestion, and absorption of the feeding ruminants [6].”
BackgroundChen, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Zheng, N., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture15010005 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Puițel, A. C., Bălușescu, G., Balan, C. D., et al. (2024) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym16111542 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“In the “conventional approach”, there are three basic ways to deal with corn agricultural waste: silage conversion [4], soil integration before or after incineration [5], and, in some regions, as a fuel source [6].”
BackgroundWang, Y., Ying, G., Zhang, Z., Tang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Chen, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1285582 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…making it an indispensable basic feed source for ruminants, especially dairy cattle, in Europe and the United States, whole-plant corn silage has become a vital and widely used feed in dairy production (Khan et al., 2015; Ferraretto et al., 2018; Reed et al., 2022; Shi et al., 2022a).”
BackgroundAssessment of Maize Silage Quality under Different Pre-Ensiling Conditions
Serva, L., Andrighetto, I., Segato, S., Marchesini, G., Chinello, M., & Magrin, L. (2023) · Data · doi:10.3390/data8070117 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Farmers and maize growers can use this information to make more informed decisions on harvesting and transforming the whole plant into silage [10].”
Backgroundde Oliveira, M. H., Costa, C., Pariz, C. M., et al. (2021) · Semina Ciências Agrárias · doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n2p845 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“On the other hand, the delay in harvesting leads to an increase in the vitreousness of the kernel (Ferraretto et al., 2018), decreasing its digestibility.”
Backgroundde Mendonça, R. D. C. A., Cardoso, M. V. S. B., Pantoja, S. O. S., de Souza, M. S., Domingues, F. N., Faturi, C., da Silva, T. C., & do Rêgo, A. C. (2020) · Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia · doi:10.37496/rbz4920190231 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Overall, increasing the height at which the corn crop harvested increases the proportion of grain of the forage, thereby increasing the nutritive value of silage (Ferraretto et al., 2018).”
BackgroundResearch on Mass Prediction of Maize Kernel Based on Machine Vision and Machine Learning Algorithm
Yang, Y., Fan, C., Li, Q., et al. (2025) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13020346 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Zhao, N., Hao, X., Yin, M., Li, C., Wang, C., & Han, H. (2024) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture14081323 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Ferraretto [24] suggests that an increase in starch content within the silage reduces the proportions of both NDF and CP in the whole plant, explaining why the NDF and CP contents are lower during and after the dough stage compared to the heading stage.”
BackgroundXu, X., Xu, Z., Yang, B., Yi, K., He, F., Sun, A., Li, J., Luo, Y., & Wang, J. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13193104 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Soil cadmium can be absorbed and accumulated by maize [9], and simultaneously, whole-plant maize silage is a high-quality feedstuff that is widely used in cattle diet [10].”
BackgroundCarey, R. E., Paddock, Z. D., Ribeiro, G. O., McAllister, T. A., & Penner, G. B. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2022-0122 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Replacing barley silage and barley grain with snaplage Most peer-reviewed in vivo snaplage research has been focused on dairy cattle starch digestion and lactation performance (Evans et al. 2013; Akins and Shaver 2014; Ferraretto et al. 2018), but recently, snaplage has garnered interest as a roughage and energy ingre…”
BackgroundTarnonsky, F., Hochmuth, K. G., DiCostanzo, A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skac397 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Rocha, E. M. C., Drewry, J. L., Willett, R. M., & Luck, B. D. (2022) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2022.107415 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationAgustinho, B. C., Daniel, J. L. P., Zeoula, L. M., Ferraretto, L. F., Monteiro, H. F., Pupo, M. R., Ghizzi, L. G., Agarussi, M. C. N., Heinzen, C., Lobo, R. R., et al. (2021) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skab295 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationConversion of Food Waste to Animal Feeds
Murugesan, K., Srinivasan, K. R., Paramasivam, K., Selvam, A., & Wong, J. W. C. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819148-4.00011-7 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production
Vítěz, T., Elbl, J., Trávníček, P., Kobzová, E., Hammerschmiedt, T., Koutný, T., Kintl, A., & Vítězová, M. (2020) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Lelis, D. L., Paciullo, D. S. C., Morenz, M. J. F., Gomide, C. A. D. M., Roseira, J. P. S., Lopes, F. C. F., Oliveira, J. S. E., Pereira, O. G., da Silva, V. P., & Chizzotti, F. H. M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-88367-9 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Automatic Control System for Maize Threshing Concave Clearance Based on Entrainment Loss Monitoring
Yang, Y., Cheng, Y. M., Fan, C., et al. (2024) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13010058 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Gheller, L. S., Wagemann-Fluxá, C., & DeVries, T. J. (2024) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25118 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“It is important to note that corn silage is a high-energy ingredient (Ferraretto et al., 2018), necessitating the addition of lower energy-density ingredients, such as straw, to achieve dietary balance.”
BackgroundIn vitro digestibility as screening tool for improved forage quality in triticale
Zutter, A. D., Boever, J. L. D., Muylle, H., et al. (2023) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109009 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Koenig, K. M., Li, C., Hunt, D., Beauchemin, K. A., & Bittman, S. (2022) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2022-22110 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Segato, S., Marchesini, G., Magrin, L., Contiero, B., Andrighetto, I., & Serva, L. (2022) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture12060785 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Segato, S., Marchesini, G., Serva, L., Contiero, B., Magrin, L., & Andrighetto, I. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12020429 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Model Study on the Combination of Operating Parameters of Corn Kernel Harvesters
Zhou, D., Xu, C., Xin, Y., et al. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app112110328 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Corn Silage, Meta-Analysis of The Quality and Yield of Different Regions in the WorldPreprint
García-Chávez, I., Meraz-Romero, E., Ortega, O. A. C., Zaragoza-Esparza, J., Osorio-Ávalos, J., Jimenez, L. E. R., & González-Ronquillo, M. (2020) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202010.0094.v1 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The maturity of the whole plant at harvest affects the yield of lactation by dairy cows, the higher the maturity and with an estimate of the nutritional value of the Nitrogen Free Extract, a higher production is achieved when harvested at approximately 35 g/100 g DM [34].”
BackgroundInfluentialCorn grain rehydration methods: Water vs. cactus pear in the diet for feedlot lambs
Soares, R. L., de Oliveira, J. S., Santos, E. M., de Araújo, G. G. L., Santos, F. N. D. S., Gomes, P. G. B., Justino, E. D. S., Pereira, D. M., Cavalcanti, H. S., Leite, G. M., et al. (2023) · Small Ruminant Research · doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2023.107151 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Saylor, B. A., Heinzen, C., Diepersloot, E. C., & Ferraretto, L. F. (2022) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skac254 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationTeixeira, D. A. A., Costa, K. A. D. P., Dias, M. B. D. C., et al. (2022) · Tropical Grasslands - Forrajes Tropicales · doi:10.17138/tgft(10)134-142 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Quality of Chopped Maize Can Be Improved by Processing
Jančík, F., Kubelková, P., Kumprechtová, D., Loucka, R., Homolka, P., Koukolová, V., Tyrolová, Y., & Výborná, A. (2021) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture11121226 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“[10] demonstrated increased kernel processing using SHR”
BackgroundAdvanced Studies in the 21st Century Animal Nutrition
Babinszky, L., Oliveira, J., & Santos, E. M. (2021) · Veterinary medicine and science · doi:10.5772/intechopen.92512 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Velho, J. P., Zardin, P. B., Jobim, C. C., Haygert-Velho, I. M. P., Alessio, D. R. M., Giotto, Ê., Menegazzi, G., & Gehrke, C. R. (2019) · Semina Ciências Agrárias · doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n1p239 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“According to Ferraretto et al. (2018), whole-plant corn silage stands out because of lower harvesting costs due to the high production of DM per hectare.”
BackgroundWang, X., Li, G., Liu, Y., et al. (2023) · Cogent Food & Agriculture · doi:10.1080/23311932.2023.2236825 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Velarde-Guillén, J., Sainz-Ramírez, A., Celis-Álvarez, M. D., Arriaga-Jordán, C. M., & Martínez‐García, C. G. (2022) · Tropical Animal Health and Production · doi:10.1007/s11250-022-03298-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“, 2018), which is an important fermentable energy source (Ferraretto et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialKolar, S., Vranić, M., Božić, L., & Bošnjak, K. (2022) · Journal of Central European Agriculture · doi:10.5513/jcea01/23.2.3504 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Cañete, D. C., & Alvarez, M. T. S. (2021) · Universal Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.13189/ujar.2021.090303 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Duhatschek, D., Pilati, A., Luckasson, L., Goeser, J., Coons, E., Ferraretto, L. F., Bell, J., Smith, J. K., Paudyal, S., & Piñeiro, J. M. (2025) · JDS Communications · doi:10.3168/jdsc.2025-0762 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Ferraretto et al. (2018) reviewed the literature and found increased starch and CP content when whole-plant corn silage was compared with snaplage.”
InfluentialSelf-citationZhang, J., Cai, C., Yan, C., & Wang, G. (2025) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2025.104324 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Mastroeni, C., Fiorbelli, E., Sigolo, S., Novara, V., Carboni, E., Eisner, I., Fantinati, P., & Gallo, A. (2024) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116176 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Quinby, M. P., Nave, R. L. G., Sykes, V. R., et al. (2023) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy13092377 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Zhang, C., Jiang, J., Li, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., & Wang, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1189358 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“More importantly, in comparison with other forages, WPCS provides uniquely high energy (mainly from starch in the kernel fraction) and physically effective neutral detergent fiber (NDF, peNDF) concurrently (3, 4).”
Background
- Authors
- Ferraretto, L. F., Shaver, R. D., & Luck, B. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ferraretto, L.F.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3937-3951
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802404597
- Semantic Scholar
- 3fe70a9409fbc9753cab3005ea30dde318397c19
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Keywords
- whole-plant corn silage, harvest maturity, cutting height, nutritional value, dairy cow milk production, fiber digestibility, starch digestibility, harvesting efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Cattle, Zea mays, Digestion, Food Handling, Nutritive Value, Silage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review