Cited by 1Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationRNA Research and SplicingNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Regulation and expression of elrD1 and elrD2 transcripts during early Xenopus laevis development

Open access
Nassar, Fida·2011·The International Journal of Developmental Biology

Abstract

The Xenopus laevis elrD (elav-like ribonucleoprotein D) gene is a member of the elav/Hu family which encodes RNA-binding proteins. Most of the elav/Hu genes are expressed in the nervous system, where they are implicated in the development and maintenance of neurons. The regulation of elrD gene expression involves two promoters, pD1 and pD2. In this study, we analyzed the neural specificity directed by both promoters. They were fused to the gene encoding green fluorescent protein, and their ability to drive neural expression in injected Xenopus embryos was examined. We show that both promoters direct neural expression and that whole promoter sequences are needed to induce neural specific expression. Finally, we analyzed the spatial and temporal localization of the two elrD transcripts, elrD1 and elrD2. We found that the two transcripts present the same tissue-specific pattern of expression, with distinct developmental regulation. Our results show a complex regulation of the elrD gene and suggest that different transcripts resulting from alternative splicing of the elrD gene probably define different neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1387/ijdb.093050fn

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Richard K.T. Kam, Yonglong Chen, Sun-On Chan, Wood-Yee Chan, Igor B. Dawid and Hui Zhao Int. J. Dev. Biol. (2010) 54: 1355-1360 (doi: 10.1387/ijdb.092984rk) Differential expression of the Brunol/CELF family genes during Xenopus laevis early development · DOI

Authors
Nassar, F.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Nassar, Fida
Venue
The International Journal of Developmental Biology
Publisher
EHU Press
Published
2011
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
127-132
ISSN
0214-6282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041760011
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2013: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
RNA-binding proteins, Xenopus laevis, alternative splicing, promoter analysis, neuronal gene expression, developmental gene regulation, transcript localization
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Ribonucleoproteins, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Xenopus laevis, Alternative Splicing, In Situ Hybridization, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Protein Isoforms, Xenopus Proteins, Green Fluorescent Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review