Cited by 31Temporomandibular Joint DisordersHealth Sciences Research and EducationScientific and Engineering Research Topics

The feasibility of a clinical trial of pain related to temporomandibular muscle and joint disorders

Open access
Velly, Ana M., Schiffman, Eric L., Rindal, D. Brad, Cunha-Cruz, Joana, Gilbert, Gregg H., Lehmann, Maryann, Horowitz, Allan, Fricton, James·2013·The Journal of the American Dental Association

Abstract

Background This survey characterized the strategies used by general dentists to manage temporomandibular muscle joint disorders (TMJD) pain, and assessed the feasibility of doing a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of the effectiveness of these strategies. Methods Dentists from three Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs) specifically, DPBRN, PEARL, NWPRECEDENT) accepted to participate in this survey. Results Out of 862 dentists surveyed, 654 were general dentists who treat TMJD; among these, 80.3 percent stated they would participate in a RCT. Dentists treated an average of three pain-related TMJD patients per month. Splints (97.6 percent), self-care (85.9 percent) and over-the-counter or prescribed medications (84.6 percent) were the treatments most frequently used. The preferred treatments to compare in a RCT were splint therapy (35.8 percent), self-care (27.4 percent) and medications (16.9 percent). Conclusions Most general dentists treat TMJD pain, and reversible initial care is typically provided. Finally, it is feasible to conduct a RCT in the PBRNs to assess the effectiveness of splint therapy, medications and/or self-care, for the initial management of painful TMJD. Clinical Implications There is an opportunity to do a RCT in PBRNs leading to the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines for the initial treatment of pain-related TMJD by primary care dentists.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0022

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Japanese network JDPBRN has also been involved in some studies in partnership with the American NDPBRN.

    “In addition, the Japanese network JDPBRN has also been involved in some studies in partnership with the American NDPBRN [34].”

    From Dental Practice-Based Research Networks (D-PBRN) worldwide: a scoping review. (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction describes DPBRN as a network of practices in the United States and Scandinavia, and the Methods identify DPBRN, PEARL, and PRECEDENT as the networks in this survey (page numbers unavailable). Searches for JDPBRN, Japan, and a partnership with NDPBRN found no passage addressing the claimed Japanese–American collaboration. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Velly, A. M., Schiffman, E. L., Rindal, D. B., Cunha-Cruz, J., Gilbert, G. H., Lehmann, M., Horowitz, A., & Fricton, J.
Affiliations
Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Velly, Ana M.
Venue
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
144
Issue
1
Pages
e01-e10
ISSN
0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W171169037
Cited by
31
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (U01-DE-16750, U01-DE-16746, U01DE016752, U01DE016746, U01-DE-16755, U01DE016754, U01-DE-16752, U19-DE-22516, U01DE016750, U01‐DE‐16747, U01‐DE‐16754, U01DE016755, U01DE016747, U19DE022516)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Scientific and Engineering Research Topics
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, temporomandibular joint pain, general dentists, splint therapy, mouthguards, self-care, medication management, dental practice-based research network, evidence-based treatment guidelines
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Attitude of Health Personnel, Dentists, Nonprescription Drugs, Facial Pain, Feasibility Studies, Female, General Practice, Dental, Headache, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth Protectors, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Scandinavian and Nordic Countries, Self Care, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome, United States, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Occlusal Splints, Dental Research, Prescription Drugs, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review