The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cueing Retrospective Verbal Reports in Usability Testing Through Eye-Movement Replay
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They found that the gaze augmented RTA helped in identifying more usability problems than CTA or RTA with plain screen playback in certain cases.”
From Gaze Path Stimulation in Retrospective Think-Aloud (2008) · cites this paper as Eger, Ball, Stevens and Dodd (2007)
In the citing paper
“They found a strong interaction between a search engine (Infomagnet vs. Google) and the cue type (gaze-augmented vs. plain screen playback).This suggests that the gaze-augmented playback is especially useful in evaluating more complex (search) environments.”
From Gaze Path Stimulation in Retrospective Think-Aloud (2008) · cites this paper as Eger, Ball, Stevens and Dodd (2007)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Eye tracking in HCI and usability research
Poole, A., & Ball, L. J. (2006) · Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction · doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-562-7.ch034 · Cited by 690 · cited 2×
“This assumes a strong correlation between where an individual is looking and what they are thinking about [25].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Gaze Path Stimulation in Retrospective Think-Aloud
Hyrskykari, A., Ovaska, S., Majaranta, P., Räihä, K.-J., & Lehtinen, M. (2008) · Journal of Eye Movement Research · doi:10.16910/jemr.2.4.5 · Cited by 118
Prokop, M., Pilař, L., & Tichá, I. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102750 · Cited by 48
A Visual Narrative Path from Switching to Resuming a Requirements Engineering Task
Abad, Z. S. H., Shymka, A., Le, J., Hammad, N., & Ruhe, G. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re.2017.81 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Eger, N., Ball, L. J., Stevens, R., & Dodd, J.
- Affiliations
- Sony Ericsson Software Applications Laboratory Warrington, WA3 6AE, UK
- Department of Psychology Lancaster University Lancaster, LA1 4YF, UK
- Bunnyfoot Harwell Innovation Centre Harwell, OX11 0QG, UK
- Venue
- Electronic Workshops in Computing
- Publisher
- BCS Learning & Development
- Published
- 2007
- ISSN
- 1477-9358
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cueing Retrospective Verbal Reports in Usability Testing Through Eye-Movement Replay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14236/ewic/hci2007.13
- The paper
- Eger, N., Ball, L. J., Stevens, R., & Dodd, J. (2007). Cueing Retrospective Verbal Reports in Usability Testing Through Eye-Movement Replay. Electronic Workshops in Computing. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2007.13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
