The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+) and Electronic Physical Activity Readiness Medical Examination (ePARmed-X+)
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) and the Physical Activity Readiness Medical Evaluation (PARmed-X) are internationally renowned pre-participation screening tools. However, these forms were developed without evidence-based support. Moreover, feedback from end-users highlighted the need for refinement. Purpose: To examine the evidence-based support for the PAR-Q and PARmed-X and identify if further revisions were warranted. Methods: Ten systematic reviews were conducted to establish the exercise-related risks and effective risk stratification in healthy individuals (including pregnant women) and persons with prominent chronic medical conditions. This process adhered to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. Key Findings: Habitual physical activity is associated with a reduced risk for over 25 chronic conditions and premature mortality. Moderate intensity physical activity on most days of the week is of benefit for most patients with chronic conditions. The risks associated with a physically inactive lifestyle are markedly higher than the transient risks seen following acute exercise (in healthy and clinical populations). Changes to the PAR-Q and PARmed-X: The result of this process was the development of a new and enhanced pre-participation screening and risk stratification strategy that serves to reduce the barriers to physical activity for Canadians across the lifespan (including those with various chronic conditions). This included the development of the new PAR-Q+ and the online ePARmed-X+. The new screening tools and risk stratification strategy are now evidence-based, and serve to greatly reduce the barriers to physical activity for all (including those living with a chronic medical condition).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Israeli Gymnasium Law was recently modified to allow those seeking health club participation to self-complete the PAR-Q+ in lieu of a physician evaluation.
“Recently the law was modified to allow those seeking health club participation, to self-complete the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+) [13] in lieu of a physician evaluation [14].”
From Pre-exercise screening: role of the primary care physician (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scherrenberg, M., Wilhelm, M., Hansen, D., Völler, H., Cornelissen, V., Frederix, I., Kemps, H., & Dendale, P. (2021) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487320939671 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Jung, M. E., Bourne, J. E., Beauchamp, M. R., Robinson, E., & Little, J. P. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes Research · doi:10.1155/2015/191595 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Variety support and exercise adherence behavior: experimental and mediating effects
Sylvester, B. D., Standage, M., McEwan, D., Wolf, S. A., Lubans, D. R., Eather, N., Kaulius, M., Ruissen, G. R., Crocker, P. R. E., Zumbo, B. D., et al. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-015-9688-4 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Pre-exercise screening: role of the primary care physician
Joy, E. A., & Pescatello, L. S. (2016) · Israel Journal of Health Policy Research · doi:10.1186/s13584-016-0089-0 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Olthuis, J. V., Watt, M. C., DeWolfe, C. E. J., Connell, E., Wright, E. N., & Sevigny, L. (2020) · Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal · doi:10.1123/wspaj.2020-0004 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kostrna, J., Oparina, E., Palacios, C., Rodriguez, A. J., Pei, J., Ajmal, A., & Ramella-Roman, J. C. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26102922 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Warburton, D. E. R., Jamnik, V. K., Bredin, S. S. D., & Gledhill, N.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- York University (CA)
- Venue
- The Health & Fitness Journal of Canada
- Publisher
- The Health & Fitness Journal of Canada
- Published
- 2011-04-14
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 3-17
- OpenAlex
- W1982310662
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Open Collections
- Health & fitness journal of Canada
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire, pre-participation screening, chronic disease, pregnant women, barriers to physical activity, AGREE instrument
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review