Cited by 3Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 20 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Atorvastatin-Induced Liver Injury With Concurrent Rhabdomyolysis After a Positive Rechallenge

Open access

Abstract

Statin-induced liver injury has been widely described. However, cases of clinically significant liver injury are rare. We present a 56-year-old woman who developed atorvastatin-induced grade III acute liver injury with concurrent rhabdomyolysis that worsened after rechallenging, which highlighted the need for pharmacovigilance with statins. The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method and Revised Electronic Causality Assessment Method both showed that atorvastatin was highly probable in causing hepatotoxicity. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of concurrent drug-induced liver injury and rhabdomyolysis after a positive rechallenge with atorvastatin.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This case report describes a 56-year-old woman who developed atorvastatin-induced grade III acute liver injury with concurrent rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis, worsening after atorvastatin rechallenge. The authors report this as the first case of concurrent drug-induced liver injury and rhabdomyolysis after a positive rechallenge with atorvastatin.

Key findings

  • Initial presentation showed mixed liver injury with ALT 541, AST 1179, ALP 383, total bilirubin 15.8, INR 1.3, platelets 70, CK 1760, and R-factor 4.2; liver enzymes were normal 4 months earlier when atorvastatin 40 mg, clopidogrel 75 mg, and aspirin 81 mg were started.
  • After atorvastatin rechallenge, liver enzymes rose within 5 days and peaked at ALT 1001, AST 4169, and ALP 623 with R-factor 4.8; she simultaneously developed severe rhabdomyolysis with peak CK 316,454 IU and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis.
  • Liver biopsy showed severe acute hepatitis with zone 3 necrosis and an eosinophil-predominant infiltrate with some plasma cells, suggestive of drug-induced liver injury.
  • Causality assessment supported atorvastatin: RUCAM score 9 and RECAM score 14, both indicating atorvastatin as a highly probable cause; liver enzymes, renal function, and CK returned to normal over 3 months after permanent discontinuation.

Methods

  • Design: single-patient case report from a liver transplant center.
  • Data/sample: a 56-year-old woman with hypertension and ischemic cerebrovascular accident, no history of liver disease, presenting with confusion, jaundice, myalgias, and dark urine after atorvastatin exposure.
  • Main analysis: descriptive clinical course, laboratory monitoring, liver biopsy, exclusion of other etiologies, and causality scoring using RUCAM and RECAM.

Limitations

  • The paper states no limitations.
  • Evident from the text: this is a single case report, so findings cannot establish incidence, causality in other patients, or generalizable risk.
  • Evident from the text: the report does not describe genetic or pharmacogenetic testing, although it discusses SLCO1B1, CYP450, and HLA variants as risk factors for statin-associated DILI and rhabdomyolysis.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14309/crj.0000000000001570

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Liver biopsy demonstrated severe, acute neuroinflammatory hepatitis with zone 3 necrosis and an eosinophil predominant infiltrate with some plasma cells.

    “To rule out other causes of ALI, liver biopsy was done and demonstrated severe, acute neuroinflammatory hepatitis with zone 3 necrosis and an eosinophil predominant infiltrate with some plasma cells (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    On admission, labs were notable for ALT 541, AST 1179, ALP 383, total bilirubin 15.8, direct bilirubin 11.8, INR 1.3, platelets 70, and CK 1760.

    “On admission, her laboratory results were notable for an alanine aminotransferase 541, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 1179, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 383, total bilirubin 15.8, direct bilirubin 11.8, international normalized ratio 1.3, platelets 70, and creatine kinase (CK) 1760.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Initial workup was negative for viral, autoimmune, vascular, and other drug toxicity as potential etiologies of ALI.

    “Initial workup was negative for viral, autoimmune, vascular, and other drug toxicity as potential etiologies of ALI.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The patient developed concurrent rhabdomyolysis.

    “We report a case of a 56-year-old woman who developed atorvastatin-induced grade III acute liver injury (ALI) complicated by rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis, with recurrence of liver injury on rechallenge.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Her liver enzymes peaked at ALT 1001, AST 4169, and ALP 623.

    “Her liver enzymes peaked at an ALT 1001, AST 4169, and ALP 623.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 10
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    IV N-acetylcysteine was started, and liver enzymes and function improved over 3 days with labs improving to ALT 406, AST 792, INR 0.9, total bilirubin 3.1, and ALP 259.

    “N-acetylcysteine was started, and her liver enzymes and function improved over the course of 3 days with laboratory values improving to ALT 406, AST 792, INR 0.9, total bilirubin 3.1, and ALP 259.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Atorvastatin was permanently discontinued, and her liver enzymes, renal function, and CK levels returned to normal with supportive management over 3 months.

    “Atorvastatin was permanently discontinued, and her liver enzymes, renal function, and CK levels returned to normal with supportive management over the course of 3 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The patient was a 56-year-old woman with hypertension and ischemic CVA and no history of liver disease.

    “A 56-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and ischemic CVA and no history of liver disease presented as a transfer to our liver transplant center for the management of ALI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Her liver enzymes began to rise 5 days after statin reintroduction, and the patient redeveloped worsening hepatocellular injury.

    “Her liver enzymes began to rise 5 days after statin reintroduction, and the patient redeveloped worsening hepatocellular injury.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The patient was initiated on atorvastatin 40 mg, clopidogrel 75 mg, and aspirin 81 mg for a CVA 4 months before presentation, and her liver enzymes were normal at that time.

    “Of note, she was initiated on atorvastatin 40 mg, clopidogrel 75 mg, and aspirin 81 mg for a CVA that occurred 4 months before presentation, and her liver enzymes were normal at that time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The patient was not on other new medications or herbal supplements in the year before and did not use alcohol or illicit substances.

    “She was not on other new medications or herbal supplements in the year before and did not use alcohol or illicit substances.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    She developed severe rhabdomyolysis with a peak CK level of 316,454 IU complicated by acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis following the rechallenge.

    “Simultaneously, she developed severe rhabdomyolysis with a peak CK level of 316,454 IU complicated by acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis following the rechallenge.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Although CK was markedly elevated with rechallenge, simultaneous liver biopsy demonstrated evidence of DILI.

    “Although CK was markedly elevated with the rechallenge of atorvastatin, simultaneous liver biopsy demonstrated evidence of DILI.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The incidence of statin-induced liver injury is estimated to be up to 3% in patients.

    “The incidence of statin-induced liver injury is estimated to be up to 3% in patients with the majority of cases demonstrating only minor elevations in liver enzymes that often resolve spontaneously.4”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Russo MW Hoofnagle JH Gu J. Spectrum of statin hepatotoxicity: Experience of the drug-induced liver injury network. Hepatology. 2014; 60(2): 679– 86. 24700436 PMC4110177
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Of the statins currently available, the risk of DILI appears to be highest with atorvastatin based on data from the US DILIN prospective study and FDA FAERS database.

    “Of the statins currently available, the risk of DILI appears to be highest with atorvastatin based on data collected from the US DILI Network prospective study and from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System database.4,7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Russo MW Hoofnagle JH Gu J. Spectrum of statin hepatotoxicity: Experience of the drug-induced liver injury network. Hepatology. 2014; 60(2): 679– 86. 24700436 PMC4110177
    • cites [7] Kamimura H Setsu T Kimura N. Analysis of drug-induced liver-related adverse event trend reporting between 1997 and 2019. Hepatol Res. 2023; 53(6): 556– 68. 36680351
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The majority of statin-induced liver injury cases demonstrate only minor elevations in liver enzymes that often resolve spontaneously.

    “The incidence of statin-induced liver injury is estimated to be up to 3% in patients with the majority of cases demonstrating only minor elevations in liver enzymes that often resolve spontaneously.4”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Russo MW Hoofnagle JH Gu J. Spectrum of statin hepatotoxicity: Experience of the drug-induced liver injury network. Hepatology. 2014; 60(2): 679– 86. 24700436 PMC4110177
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These findings suggested the presence of concurrent statin-induced DILI and severe rhabdomyolysis due to a clinically positive rechallenge of atorvastatin.

    “These findings suggested the presence of concurrent statin-induced DILI and severe rhabdomyolysis due to a clinically positive rechallenge of atorvastatin.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Variants in SLCO1B1 gene have been linked to elevated statin levels, raising the risk of both DILI and rhabdomyolysis.

    “Variants in the SLCO1B1 gene, which encodes a transporter protein involved in statin metabolism, have been linked to elevated statin levels in the blood, raising the risk of both DILI and rhabdomyolysis.14”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Cooper-DeHoff RM Niemi M Ramsey LB. The clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for SLCO1B1, ABCG2, and CYP2C9 genotypes and statin-associated musculoskeletal symptoms. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022; 111(5): 1007– 21. 35152405 PMC9035072
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Polymorphisms in various CYP450 enzymes and specific HLA alleles involved in statin metabolism may contribute to increased risk of liver injury and rhabdomyolysis.

    “In addition, polymorphisms in various cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes and specific human leukocyte antigen alleles involved in statin metabolism may contribute to an increased risk of liver injury and rhabdomyolysis.14–16”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14] Cooper-DeHoff RM Niemi M Ramsey LB. The clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for SLCO1B1, ABCG2, and CYP2C9 genotypes and statin-associated musculoskeletal symptoms. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022; 111(5): 1007– 21. 35152405 PMC9035072
    • cites [15] Fukunaga K Nakagawa H Ishikawa T Kubo M Mushiroda T. ABCB1 polymorphism is associated with atorvastatin-induced liver injury in Japanese population. BMC Genet. 2016; 17(1): 79. 27296832 PMC4906899
    • cites [16] Nicoletti P Aithal GP Bjornsson ES. Association of liver injury from specific drugs, or groups of drugs, with polymorphisms in HLA and other genes in a genome-wide association study. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152(5): 1078– 89. 28043905 PMC5367948
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The overall incidence rate for statin-induced acute liver failure has been reported to be between 1 and 2 per 100,000 person-years.

    “The overall incidence rate for statin-induced acute liver failure (ALF) has been reported to be between 1 and 2 per 100,000 person-years.2,5”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] Bays H Cohen DE Chalasani N Harrison SA; The National Lipid Association's Statin Safety Task Force. An assessment by the statin liver safety task force: 2014 update. J Clin Lipidol. 2014; 8(3 Suppl): S47– S57. 24793441
    • cites [5] Karahalil B Hare E Koç G Uslu İ Şentürk K Özkan Y. Hepatotoxicity associated with statins. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2017; 68(4): 254– 60. 29337684
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Of the 22 statin-attributed DILI patients in the US DILIN study, 9 were hospitalized, 4 developed ALF, and 1 died.

    “Of these 22 patients, 9 were hospitalized, and 4 developed ALF with 1 subsequent death.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Russo MW Hoofnagle JH Gu J. Spectrum of statin hepatotoxicity: Experience of the drug-induced liver injury network. Hepatology. 2014; 60(2): 679– 86. 24700436 PMC4110177
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    In the US DILIN study of 1,188 clinically significant DILI cases (2004-2012), 22 were attributed to statins.

    “Russo et al analyzed 1,188 cases of clinically significant DILI enrolled in the US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network between 2004 and 2012, and 22 were attributed to statins.4”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Russo MW Hoofnagle JH Gu J. Spectrum of statin hepatotoxicity: Experience of the drug-induced liver injury network. Hepatology. 2014; 60(2): 679– 86. 24700436 PMC4110177
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Atorvastatin was found to be the fifth highest drug associated with DILI among all drug categories in the US FDA FAERS database from 1997 to 2019.

    “and was found to the be the fifth highest drug associated with DILI among all drug categories in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database from 1997 to 2019.4,7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Russo MW Hoofnagle JH Gu J. Spectrum of statin hepatotoxicity: Experience of the drug-induced liver injury network. Hepatology. 2014; 60(2): 679– 86. 24700436 PMC4110177
    • cites [7] Kamimura H Setsu T Kimura N. Analysis of drug-induced liver-related adverse event trend reporting between 1997 and 2019. Hepatol Res. 2023; 53(6): 556– 68. 36680351
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Clinically significant liver injury from statins is rare.

    “However, cases of clinically significant liver injury are rare.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Russo MW Hoofnagle JH Gu J. Spectrum of statin hepatotoxicity: Experience of the drug-induced liver injury network. Hepatology. 2014; 60(2): 679– 86. 24700436 PMC4110177
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury from statins has been well described.

    “Although statins are generally well tolerated, adverse events, such as rhabdomyolysis, and idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) have been well described.2”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] Bays H Cohen DE Chalasani N Harrison SA; The National Lipid Association's Statin Safety Task Force. An assessment by the statin liver safety task force: 2014 update. J Clin Lipidol. 2014; 8(3 Suppl): S47– S57. 24793441
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The incidence of statin-related DILI remains low at 1.9% based on the US DILIN study.

    “However, the incidence of statin-related DILI remains low at 1.9% based on the US DILI Network study.4”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Russo MW Hoofnagle JH Gu J. Spectrum of statin hepatotoxicity: Experience of the drug-induced liver injury network. Hepatology. 2014; 60(2): 679– 86. 24700436 PMC4110177
21 of 21
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior case of concurrent DILI and rhabdomyolysis after a positive rechallenge with atorvastatin has been reported.

    “To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of concurrent drug-induced liver injury and rhabdomyolysis after a positive rechallenge with atorvastatin.”
    “To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of concurrent DILI and rhabdomyolysis after a positive rechallenge with atorvastatin and demonstrated the continued need for pharmacovigilance in statin-related adverse effects.”
1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Singh, H., Khalaf, A., Kunkle, B. F., Gholami, S., Lewis, J. H., & Rangnekar, A. S.
Affiliations
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Singh, Harjit
Venue
ACG Case Reports Journal
Published
2024-12-30
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
e01570
ISSN
2326-3253 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405893124
Cited by
3
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACG Case Reports Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
atorvastatin, drug-induced liver injury, rhabdomyolysis, drug rechallenge, pharmacovigilance, RUCAM, adverse drug reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review