The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of cumulative stressful educational events on the mental health of doctoral students during the Covid-19 pandemic
Abstract
High rates of psychological distress including anxiety and depression are common in the doctoral community and the learning environment has a role to play. With the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) pandemic taking a toll on mental health it is necessary to explore the risk and protective factors for this population. Using data from the Covid-19: Global Study of Social Trust and Mental Health, the present study examined the relationship between Covid-19-related stressful educational experiences and doctoral students’ mental health problems. Moreover, it assessed the role of attentional ability and coping skills in promoting good mental health. One hundred and fifty-five doctoral students completed an online survey where micro-, meso- and macro-level educational stressors were measured. The Patient Health Questionnaire and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire were used to measure depression and anxiety symptoms, respectively. We also measured coping skills using a 13-item scale and attentional ability using a questionnaire. The results of multiple linear regression analyses showed that specific stressful educational experiences were unrelated but cumulative stressful educational experiences were related to increased depression symptoms (but not anxiety symptoms) in fully adjusted models. Additionally, higher coping skills and attentional ability were related to fewer depression and anxiety symptoms. Finally, no associations between demographics and other covariates and mental health problems were found. The experience of multiple educational stressful events in their learning environment due to Covid-19 is a key risk factor for increased mental illness in the doctoral community. This could be explained by the uncertainty that the Covid-19 pandemic has caused to the students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The results of our study were slightly higher in the anxiety sub-scale, with previous studies indicating a smaller proportion of participants in the severe and extremely severe anxiety categories (between 15 and 22%; Hazell et al., 2021; Milicev et al., 2021; Sideropoulos et al., 2022).”
From The supervisory relationship as a predictor of mental health outcomes in doctoral students in the United Kingdom (2024) · cites this paper as Sideropoulos et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education
Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4089 · Cited by 1,441
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008 · Cited by 1,182 · cited 6×
“Previous research has only looked at specific single risk factors associated with doctoral students’ mental health [5,6,13,15].”
InfluentialSverdlik, A., C. Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/4113 · Cited by 616
The Role of Attentional Control in the Relationship Between Mindfulness and Anxiety
MacDonald, H. Z., & Olsen, A. (2020) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294119835756 · Cited by 64 · cited 2×
“Both outcomes support past study findings [24,25].”
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- B Pfefferbaum, 2020, Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic, N Engl J Med, 383, 510, 10.1101/10.1056/NEJMp2008017 · DOI
- E Robinson, 2022, A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, J Affect Disord, 296, 567, 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.098 · DOI · Paper page
- K Neelam, 2021, Pandemics and pre-existing mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis., Brain Behav Immun Health, 10
- J Stubb, 2011, Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being, Stud Contin Educ, 33, 33, 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515572 · DOI · Paper page
- KM Barry, 2018, Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance, High Educ Res Dev, 37, 468, 10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979 · DOI · Paper page
- OECD, 2019, Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators [online]
- M Pearson, 2008, Growth and diversity in doctoral education: assessing the Australian experience, High Educ, 55, 357, 10.1007/s10734-007-9059-3 · DOI
- JC Shin, 2018, The increasing importance, growth, and evolution of doctoral education, 1, 10.1007/978-3-319-89713-4_1 · DOI
- K Pyhältö, 2012, Exploring the fit between doctoral students’ and supervisors’ perceptions of resources and challenges vis-à-vis the doctoral journey, Int J Dr Stud, 7, 395, 10.28945/1745 · DOI
- K Pyhältö, 2012, Challenges of becoming a scholar: a study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being [online], ISRN Education
- T Thune, 2009, Doctoral students on the university–industry interface: a review of the literature, High Educ, 58, 637, 10.1007/s10734-009-9214-0 · DOI
- E Waight, 2018, Doctoral students’ access to non-academic support for mental health, J High Educ Policy Manag, 40, 390, 10.1080/1360080X.2018.1478613 · DOI · Paper page
- G Keinan, 2012, The association between cumulative adversity and mental health: considering dose and primary focus of adversity, Qual Life Res, 21, 1149, 10.1007/s11136-011-0035-0 · DOI
- AP Amaral, 2009, Cumulative effect of life events in physical and mental health, Eur Psychiatry, 24, 1, 10.1016/S0924-9338(09)71467-1 · DOI
- RJ Turner, 1995, Lifetime traumas and mental health: the significance of cumulative adversity, J Health Soc Behav, 36, 360, 10.2307/2137325 · DOI · Paper page
- R Bentley, 2012, Cumulative exposure to poor housing affordability and its association with mental health in men and women, J Epidemiol Community Health, 66, 761, 10.1136/jech-2011-200291 · DOI
- EA Schilling, 2008, The impact of cumulative childhood adversity on young adult mental health: measures, models, and interpretations, Soc Sci Med, 66, 1140, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.023 · DOI
- J Quach, 2017, The cumulative effect of health adversities on children’s later academic achievement, Acad Pediatr, 17, 706, 10.1016/j.acap.2017.03.002 · DOI
- M Esmaeilimotlagh, 2018, An investigation on coping skills training effects on mental health status of University students, J Humanit Insights, 2, 37
- ND Patias, 2021, Mental health and coping strategies in undergraduate and graduate students during COVID-19 pandemic, Trends in Psychol, 29, 414, 10.1007/s43076-021-00069-z · DOI
- AR Wasil, 2021, Commonly reported problems and coping strategies during the COVID-19 crisis: a survey of graduate and professional students, Front Psychol, 12, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.598557 · DOI
- J Heo, 2019, Descriptive and predictive modeling of student achievement, satisfaction, and mental health for data-driven smart connected campus life service, 531, 10.1145/3303772.3303792 · DOI
- KK Wong, 2020, Covid19: Global social trust and mental health study, 10.17605/OSF.IO/FE8Q7 · DOI
- RL Spitzer, 2006, A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7, Arch Intern Med, 166, 1092, 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · DOI · Paper page
- LA Adler, 2019, Establishing US norms for the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1) and characterising symptom burden among adults with self-reported ADHD, Int J Clin Pract, 73, 10.1016/j.acap.2017.03.002 · DOI
- G Johnson, 1994, An ecological framework for conceptualizing educational risk, Urban Educ, 29, 34, 10.1177/0042085994029001004 · DOI
- N Byrom, 2020, The challenges of lockdown for early-career researchers, ELife, 9, 10.7554/eLife.59634 · DOI
- EO McGee, 2019, “I Know I Have to Work Twice as Hard and Hope that Makes Me Good Enough”: exploring the stress and strain of black doctoral students in engineering and computing, Teachers College Record, 121, 1, 10.1177/016146811912100407 · DOI
- American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [online], 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mavrogalou-Foti, A. P., Kambouri, M. A., & Çili, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1437819 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sideropoulos, V., Midouhas, E., Kokosi, T., Brinkert, J., Wong, K. K.-Y., & Kambouri, M. A.
- Affiliations
- IOE (Institute of Education), UCL’s Faculty of Education and Society (University College London), Department of Psychology & Human Development, UK
- Department of Population, Policy, and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
- Venue
- UCL Open Environment
- Publisher
- UCL Press
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 4
- ISSN
- 2632-0886
- PMC
- PMC10208316
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review