Cited by 59Occupational Health and BurnoutStress and Burnout ResearchEmotional Labor in Professions

Prevalence and predictors of Burnout Syndrome among public elementary school teachers

Open access
Carlotto, Mary Sandra, Câmara, Sheila Gonçalves·2019·Análise Psicológica

Abstract

Burnout é um fenómeno psicossocial, expressão de várias crises e desorientação na sociedade, o que tem submetido muitos setores laborais a grande tensão ao longo dos anos. A profissão docente está exposta, no contexto laboral atual, a uma grande quantidade de fatores de estresse psicossocial que, se persistentes, podem levar ao Burnout. O objetivo desse estudo transversal foi identificar a prevalência e os preditores da Síndrome de Burnout (SB) em uma amostra aleatória de 679 professores brasileiros de 37 escolas públicas de ensino básico. Os instrumentos foram o Spanish Burnout Inventory, a Bateria de Riscos Psicossociais e um questionário com variáveis sociodemográficas e laborais. Foi identificada uma prevalência de 7,5% para o Perfil 1 de SB e 18,3% para o Perfil 2 de SB. Os resultados indicaram como preditores das dimensões de Burnout as variáveis autonomia, conflito de papel, ambiguidade de papel, sobrecarga, suporte social e conflitos interpessoais. Os resultados demonstram modelos preditores das dimensões de Burnout compostos de riscos psicossociais derivados do tipo de atividade e dos riscos interpessoais, destacando as variáveis suporte social e sobrecarga, presentes em todas as dimensões. São apresentadas sugestões para estudos futuros e implicações para a prática.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14417/ap.1471

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Amazarray, M. R., Câmara, S. G., & Carlotto, M. S. (2014). Investigação em saúde mental e trabalho no âmbito da saúde pública no Brasil. In A. R. C. Merlo, C. G. Bottega, & K. V. Perez (Eds.), Atenção à saúde mental do trabalhador: Sofrimento e transtornos psiquicos relacionados ao trabalho (pp. 75-92). Porto Alegre: Evangraf.
  2. Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. British Medical Journal, 314, 570-572.
  3. Gil-Monte, P. R., Carlotto, M. S., & Câmara, S. G. (2011). Prevalência de burnout em uma amostra de professores brasileiros. European Journal of Psychiatry, 25, 205-212.
  4. Khosla, M. (2013). Gender, locale and type of institution as determinents of professional burnout among elementary school teachers. Edubeam Multidisciplinary Online Research Journal, X, 1-18.
  5. Leiter, M. P., Bakker, A. B., & Maslach, C. (2014). Burnout at work. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  6. Mercado-Salgado, P., & Gil-Monte, P. R. (2010). Influencia del compromiso organizacional en la relación entre conflictos interpersonales y el síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo (burnout) en profesionales de servicios (salud y educación). Innovar Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, 20(38), 161-174.
  7. Unda, S. (2010). Estudio de prevalencia del Síndrome de Quemarse por el Trabajo (SQT) y su asociación con sobrecarga y autoeficacia en maestros de primaria de la ciudad de México. Ciencia & Trabajo, 12(35), 257-262.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlotto, M. S., & Câmara, S. G.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR)
Corresponding author
Carlotto, Mary Sandra
Venue
Análise Psicológica
Published
2019-06-07
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
135-146
ISSN
  • 0870-8231 (ISSN-L)
  • 1646-6020
OpenAlex
W2951876989
Cited by
59
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
18.65
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Análise Psicológica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (2015-2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
Keywords
burnout, teachers, public elementary schools, psychosocial risk factors, burnout prevalence, predictors of burnout, role ambiguity, role conflict, workload, social support, interpersonal conflict, teacher autonomy, occupational stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review