Cited by 62Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutHumor Studies and Applications

Relationships among humour, self-esteem, and social support to burnout in school teachers

Ho, Sammy K.·2016·Social Psychology of Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11218-015-9309-7

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, S. K.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
Corresponding author
Ho, Sammy K.
Venue
Social Psychology of Education
Published
2015-10-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
41-59
ISSN
  • 1381-2890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1928
OpenAlex
W1611277386
Cited by
62
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychology of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
Keywords
humour, burnout, self-esteem, social support, school teachers, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, perceived social support, mediation, teacher well-being, positive interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review