Cited by 74Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The Use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Substance Use Disorders: A Review of Literature

Open access
Osaji, Joy, Ojimba, Chiedozie, Ahmed, Saeed·2020·Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a form of behavioral therapy that teaches people to learn to accept rather than avoid challenging situations in their lives. ACT has shown to be an intervention with great success in the reduction of various mental disorders and substance use disorders (SUDs). The core of ACT when used in SUD treatment is guiding people to accept the urges and symptoms associated with substance misuse (acceptance) and use psychological flexibility and value-based interventions to reduce those urges and the symptoms (commitment). The purpose of this study is to review the existing literature to examine the evidence on the use of ACT in the management of SUD. METHODS: A thorough search of four databases (CINAHL, PubMed.gov, PsycINFO and PsycNET) from 2011 to 2020 was conducted using search terms like ACT, ACT and SUD, ACT, and substance misuse. The articles retrieved were critically appraised using the Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) Checklist. RESULTS: Most of the studies showed that ACT was effective in the management of SUD showing significant evidence of a reduction in substance use or total discontinuation with subsequent abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: The literature review concluded that success has been achieved using ACT either as monotherapy or in combination with other therapy in the treatment of individuals with SUD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14740/jocmr4311

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Desk reference to the diagnostic criteria from DSM 5 Spl edition (Pb 2017) (5th ed) Cbs Publishing 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osaji, J., Ojimba, C., & Ahmed, S.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • Interfaith Medical Center (US)
  • Rutland Regional Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ojimba, Chiedozie
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
Published
2020
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
629-633
ISSN
  • 1918-3003 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-3011
OpenAlex
W3088404198
Cited by
74
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, substance use disorders, psychological flexibility, substance use abstinence, addiction treatment, behavior therapy, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review