The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate
Open accessAbstract
The dynamics underlying willingness to communicate in a second or third language (L2 for short), operating in real time, are affected by a number of intra- and inter-personal processes. L2 communication is a remarkably fluid process, especially considering the wide range of skill levels observed among L2 learners and speakers. Learners often find themselves in a position that requires the use of uncertain L2 skills, be it inside or outside the classroom context. Beyond issues of competencies, which are themselves complex, using an L2 also evokes cultural, political, social, identity, motivational, emotional, pedagogical, and other issues that learners must navigate on-the-fly. The focus of this article will be on the remarkably rapid integration of factors, such as the ones just named whenever a language learner chooses to be a language speaker, that is, when the moment for authentic communication arrives. Communicative events are especially important in understanding the psychology of the L2 learner. Our research group has developed the idiodynamic method to allow examination of an individual’s experience of events on a timescale of a few minutes. Results are describing complex interactions and rapid changes in the psychological conditions that accompany both approaching and avoiding L2 communication. The research takes a new approach to familiar concepts such as motivation, language competence, learning strategies, and so on. By examining willingness to communicate as a dynamic process, new types of research questions and answers are emerging, generating new theory, research methods, and pedagogical approaches applicable both within language classrooms and beyond.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In general, studies on willingness to communicate (e.g., MacIntyre, 2020), emotions in second language learning (e.g., Dewaele & MacIntyre, 2014), and complex dynamic systems approaches (e.g., Dörnyei et al., 2015) demonstrate that learners' communicative behavior and self-perception can fluctuate significantly across time and contexts”
From The Role of Personality in Language Learning (2026) · cites this paper as MacIntyre, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious
Epstein, S. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.709 · Cited by 2,883 · cited 3×
“According to Kaufman (2016), the roots of Kahneman’s thinking can be traced to cognitive-experiential self theory (CEST; Epstein, 1991, 1994), which also proposed two systems with similar characteristics to System 1 and System 2, called “experiential” and “rational,” respectively.”
MACINTYRE, P. D., CLÉMENT, R., DÖRNYEI, Z., & NOELS, K. A. (1998) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x · Cited by 2,171
Self-citationIndividual Differences in Second Language Learning
Skehan, P. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315831664 · Cited by 1,517
Dörnyei, Z. (2003) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.53222 · Cited by 991
Personality, Attitudes, and Affect as Predictors of Second Language Communication
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x960151001 · Cited by 963
Self-citationComplex systems and applied linguistics
Weideman, A. (2009) · Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies · doi:10.2989/salals.2009.27.2.9.872 · Cited by 769
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x · Cited by 712
Self-citationThe Psychology of the Language Learner
Dörnyei, Z. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781410613349 · Cited by 700
Yashima, T., Zenuk‐Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00250.x · Cited by 684
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Charos, C. (1994). Personality and individual differences as predictors of second language communication: A causal analysis (Unpublished honors thesis). University of Ottawa, Canada.
- Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 190-209.
- Epstein, S., & Erskine, N. (1983). The development of personal theories of reality. In D. Magnusson & V. Allen (Eds.), Human development: An interactional perspective (pp. 133-147). New York: Academic Press.
- MacIntyre, P. D., & Serroul, A. (2015). Motivation on a per-second tTimescale: Examining approach-avoidance motivation during L2 task performance. In Z. Dornyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp 109-138), Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991). Willingness to communicate: A cog- nitive view. In M. Booth-Butterfield (Ed.), Communication, cognition, and anxiety (pp. 19-37). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016). Designing a tool for measuring the interrelationships between L2 WTC and confidence, beliefs, motiva- tion, and context. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Classroom-oriented research (pp. 19- 37). Heidelberg: Springer.
- Weaver, C. (2007). Willingness to communicate: A mediating factor in the interaction between learners and tasks. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 153-187). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
An idiodynamic investigation into task-specific WTC of Chinese EFL learners: a classroom-based study
Li, S., Xu, M., & Wang, H. (2026) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-026-01201-2
Metadata
- Authors
- MacIntyre, P.
- Affiliations
- Cape Breton University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- MacIntyre, Peter
- ORCID
- MacIntyre, Peter
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Publisher
- Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
- Published
- 2020-03-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-131
- ISSN
- 2083-5205 (ISSN-L)
- 2084-1965
- OpenAlex
- W3014009755
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 50.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- willingness to communicate, second language communication, language learning motivation, language competence, learning strategies, learner identity, authentic communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review