The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2020
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: report. METHODS: We obtained incidence data from the National Cancer Incidence Reporting System (1984-1991) and Canadian Cancer Registry (1992-2015). Mortality data (1984-2015) were obtained from the Canadian Vital Statistics - Death Database. All databases are maintained by Statistics Canada. Cancer incidence and mortality counts and age-standardized rates were projected to 2020 for 23 cancer types by sex and geographic region (provinces and territories) for all ages combined. RESULTS: An estimated 225 800 new cancer cases and 83 300 cancer deaths are expected in Canada in 2020. The most commonly diagnosed cancers are expected to be lung overall (29 800), breast in females (27 400) and prostate in males (23 300). Lung cancer is also expected to be the leading cause of cancer death, accounting for 25.5% of all cancer deaths, followed by colorectal (11.6%), pancreatic (6.4%) and breast (6.1%) cancers. Incidence and mortality rates will be generally higher in the eastern provinces than in the western provinces. INTERPRETATION: The number of cancer cases and deaths remains high in Canada and, owing to the growing and aging population, is expected to continue to increase. Although progress has been made in reducing deaths for most major cancers (breast, prostate and lung), there has been limited progress for pancreatic cancer, which is expected to be the third leading cause of cancer death in Canada in 2020. Additional efforts to improve uptake of existing programs, as well as to advance research, prevention, screening and treatment, are needed to address the cancer burden in Canada.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2019) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21551 · Cited by 20,160
Cited by
Yong, J. H., Mainprize, J. G., Yaffe, M. J., Ruan, Y., Poirier, A. E., Coldman, A., Nadeau, C., Iragorri, N., Hilsden, R. J., & Brenner, D. R. (2021) · Journal of Medical Screening · doi:10.1177/0969141320974711 · Cited by 187
Self-citationSmith, A. M., Leeming, A., Fang, Z., Hatchard, T., Mioduszewski, O., Schneider, M. A., Ferdossifard, A., Shergill, Y., Khoo, E.-L., & Poulin, P. (2021) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-020-00945-0 · Cited by 41
Proctor, C. J., Reiman, A. J., & Best, L. A. (2023) · Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/21642850.2023.2266220 · Cited by 11
“New medical interventions decreased cancer-related deaths for both males and females, with 63% of people expected to survive more than five years (Brenner et al., 2020).”
BackgroundBooker, R., Bays, S., Burnett, L., & Torchetti, T. (2021) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151169 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Brenner, D. R., Weir, H. K., Demers, A. A., Ellison, L. F., Louzado, C., Shaw, A., Turner, D., Woods, R. R., & Smith, L. M.
- Venue
- Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Publisher
- CMA Joule Inc.
- Published
- 2020-03-02
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- E199-E205
- ISSN
- 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
- 1488-2329
- OpenAlex
- W3009507632
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.