Cited by 43RFID technology advancementsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourElectronic Health Records Systems

Obstacles to the adoption of radio frequency identification technology in the emergency rooms of hospitals

Chen, Charlie C., Wu, Jiinpo, Crandall, Richard E.·2007·International Journal of Electronic Healthcare

Abstract

The Emergency Room (ER) receives patients in critical conditions. The operation of many emergency service chains is hampered because the required medical equipment is not always conveniently available and patient vital signs are manually monitored, but not automatically tracked on a real-time basis. This has resulted in medical errors, increased stress levels of medical teams, and poor utilisation of staff and equipment. Our research investigates factors that contribute to the adoption of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technologies by the medical team in ERs. We propose a theoretical framework to address this issue based upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1504/ijeh.2007.013100

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one reviewed study, the relationship between behavioral intentions and actual use was significant.

    “In one study, the relationship was significant [110].”
  • Only two reviewed studies tested the relationship between behavioral intentions and actual use.

    “Only two studies tested the relationship between behavioral intentions and actual use [102,110].”
  • One reviewed study tested TAM2, two tested UTAUT, and two tested a hybrid of UTAUT, TAM, and TPB.

    “One study tested TAM2 [97], two tested UTAUT [108, 110], and two tested some hybrid of UTAUT, TAM and TPB [99, 105].”
  • Five reviewed studies collected data from a mix of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and medical technicians.

    “Five studies collected data from a mix of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and medical technicians [106-110].”
  • Among the reviewed studies, voluntary IT use was more common in studies with non-significant SN effects, while mandatory IT use was more common in studies with significant SN effects.

    “In opposition to that hypothesis, in three of four studies with non-significant SN effects, IT use was voluntary [49,97] or was perceived to be voluntary [108], and IT use was mandatory in two of four studies with significant SN effects [102,110].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C. C., Wu, J., & Crandall, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Appalachian State University (US)
  • Tamkang University (TW)
Venue
International Journal of Electronic Healthcare
Published
2007
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
193
ISSN
  • 1741-8453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-8461
OpenAlex
W1976252223
Cited by
43
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Electronic Healthcare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Tamkang University Institutional Repository (TKUIR) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › RFID technology advancements
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
radio frequency identification, RFID adoption, emergency department, technology adoption barriers, UTAUT, vital signs monitoring, medical equipment availability, medical errors, hospital resource utilization
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Emergency Service, Hospital, Hospital Communication Systems, Humans, Information Systems, Quality of Health Care, Social Support, Safety Management, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review