The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Living Lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for innovation
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we focus on a new research area, Living Lab that introduces new ways of managing innovation processes. A Living Lab can be viewed as both an innovation milieu and an innovation approach and the aim of this paper is to clarify these two perspectives, as well as to illustrate how they can enrich each other. This is done by presenting one Living Lab milieu, Botnia Living Lab and its key components; and one Living Lab approach, FormIT and its key principles. The presentation is done on two levels, one general level and one case specific level. The case focuses on involving citizens in the design of an e-service aimed to increase their influence in a municipality and its development. Through this, we learnt that the key components of a Living Lab constitutes important structures that enhance the process and as such the principles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Cited by 9,368
Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
Checkland, P. B. (1981) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 6,256
Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts
von Hippel, E. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791 · Cited by 4,650
Systems thinking, systems practice
(1982) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(82)90206-5 · Cited by 3,545
Open Innovation: The New Imperative For Creating and Profiting From Technology
Mazzocchi, S. (2004) · Innovation · doi:10.5172/impp.2004.6.3.474 · Cited by 2,652
Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M. (2007) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166416 · Cited by 1,417
SHIFTING INNOVATION TO USERS VIA TOOLKITS
Katz, R. (2002) · Cited by 1,127
Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change
Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005) · Cited by 952
Tc, I., Approaches, A., Nissen, H.-E., Klein, H.-K., & Hirschheim, R. (1991) · Elsevier eBooks · Cited by 755
Action Research: Its Nature and Validity
Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998) · Systemic Practice and Action Research · doi:10.1023/a:1022908820784 · Cited by 731
Cited by
Bayuo, B. B., Chaminade, C., & Göransson, B. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120030 · Cited by 197
Wargnier, P., Malaise, A., Jacquemot, J., Benveniste, S., Jouvelot, P., Pino, M., & Rigaud, A.-S. (2015) · 2015 3rd IEEE VR International Workshop on Virtual and Augmented Assistive Technology (VAAT) · doi:10.1109/vaat.2015.7155406 · Cited by 18
Doidge, C., Burrell, A., van Schaik, G., & Kaler, J. (2024) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2024.101124 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Kareborn, B. B., & Stahlbrost, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 356
- ISSN
- 1753-0660 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-0679
- OpenAlex
- W2085514837
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Living Lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1504/ijird.2009.022727
- The paper
- Kareborn, B. B., & Stahlbrost, A. (2009). Living Lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijird.2009.022727
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
