The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open Innovation and Strategy
Abstract
The article discusses a process of business innovation known as open innovation and its relation to traditional business strategy. The competitive strategy developed by Michael Porter emphasized rivalry, buyer power, and barriers to entry as forces that could enhance a producer's surplus. The authors discuss the impact of the Porterian value chain, the processes of production through to the consumer, on subsequent business practices. However, this theory does not account for external sources of value to a company, such as innovation communities, volunteer contributors and surrounding networks, including social networking web sites, open source software and the Wiki model of open contributions. The concept of openness requires shifting from ownership to value creation and value capture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · cited 1×
“Hansen’s analysis of internal networks inside a large firm found that it was costly to maintain ties within the network past a certain size.(51) Laursen and Salter’s analysis of data from the British government’s Survey of Manufacturers found that respondents’ innovation outcomes were positively associated with greate…”
BackgroundStrategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
Design Rules: The Power of Modularity
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001 · Cited by 3,504
Coase's penguin, or, linux and “the nature of the firm”
Benkler, Y. (2002) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/1562247 · Cited by 1,572
Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry
Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150505 · Cited by 1,166
Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development
Shah, S. K. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553 · Cited by 894
A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets
Dahlander, L., & Wallin, M. W. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.011 · Cited by 470
SAFEGUARDING INVESTMENTS IN ASYMMETRIC INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE.
Subramani, M. R., & Venkatraman, N. (2003) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/30040675 · Cited by 377
Cited by
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013 · Cited by 2,435
Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context
Thomas, L. D. W., Autio, E., & Gann, D. M. (2014) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2011.0105 · Cited by 639
Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research
Calabrò, A., Vecchiarini, M., Gast, J., Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2019) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12192 · Cited by 495
Value Creation and Value Capture in Open Innovation
Chesbrough, H., Lettl, C., & Ritter, T. (2018) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12471 · Cited by 486
Self-citationOpening Strategy: Evolution of a Precarious Profession
Whittington, R., Cailluet, L., & Yakis‐Douglas, B. (2011) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00762.x · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-76
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W2135322495
- Cited by
- 1,417
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 107.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open Innovation and Strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/41166416
- The paper
- Chesbrough, H. W., & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open Innovation and Strategy. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
