Cited by 28Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsConsumer Retail Behavior Studies

The Influence of Initial Possession Level on Consumers' Adoption of a Collection Goal: A Tipping Point Effect

Gao, Leilei, Huang, Yanliu, Simonson, Itamar·2014·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Previous research has typically treated collection as a top-down process and focused on its later stages. However, collections may start by accident and are often triggered by incidental, bottom-up factors. The authors propose that a small number of possessions (i.e., a few more than one) represent an unjustified and, thus, unstable possession level that prompts a status change. They examine the collection tipping point at which obtaining items belonging to a series (e.g., a couple of collectible Coke cans) often gives rise to a decision to start a collection. Consumers then seek additional items to fulfill their emerging goal. In six lab studies and one field study, the authors investigate the tipping point at which a collection “project” begins and explore the psychological processes underlying that tipping point. In addition, they discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of this research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jm.13.0475

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three behaviors (or items) is often a 'tipping point' when consumers start to gain meaning from a set.

    “Other research supports the idea that three behaviors (or items) is often a 'tipping point' when consumers start to gain meaning from a set (e.g., consumer collections: Gao, Huang and Simonson 2014).”

    From On or Off Track: How (Broken) Streaks Affect Consumer Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as Gao, Huang and Simonson 2014

  • Consumers continue certain behaviors after several past instances.

    “Additionally, we contribute to past work showing that consumers continue certain behaviors after several past instances (e.g., collecting two or three items: Gao et al. 2014; acquiring a medium like loyalty points: Hsee et al. 2003)”

    From On or Off Track: How (Broken) Streaks Affect Consumer Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as Gao et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, L., Huang, Y., & Simonson, I.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gao, Leilei
  • Huang, Yanliu
  • Simonson, Itamar
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
2014-11
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
143-156
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2160368255
Cited by
28
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Keywords
tipping points, status change, purchase decision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review