The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Wealth: The Role of Marketing Capability
Abstract
Despite the positive societal implications of corporate social responsibility (CSR), there remains an extensive debate regarding its consequences for firm shareholders. This study posits that marketing capability plays a complementary role in the CSR–shareholder wealth relationship. It further argues that the influence of marketing capability will be higher for CSR types with verifiable benefits to firm stakeholders (i.e., consumers, employees, channel partners, and regulators). An analysis utilizing secondary information for a large sample of 1,725 firms for the years 2000–2009 indicates that the effects of overall CSR efforts on stock returns and idiosyncratic risk are not significant on their own but only become so in the presence of marketing capability. Furthermore, the results reveal that although marketing capability has positive interaction effects with verifiable CSR efforts—environment (e.g., using clean energy), products (e.g., providing to economically disadvantaged), diversity (e.g., pursuing diversity in top management), corporate governance (e.g., limiting board compensation), and employees (e.g., supporting unions)—on stock returns (and negative interaction effects with these CSR efforts on idiosyncratic risk), it has no significant interaction effect with community-based efforts (e.g., charitable giving).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Carhart, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x · Cited by 17,283
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias
Zellner, A. (1962) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664 · Cited by 8,401
From the New York Times Magazine
Minsky, & Hyman, P. (1979) · Cited by 6,899
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Ganesan, S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800201 · Cited by 6,741
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- BlairSean and AlexanderChernev (2012), “Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Social Goodwill,” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series, Report 12-103. · doi:10.1037/e620972012-120
- 10.1177/002224299706100106 · doi:10.1177/002224299706100106 · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.1979.4498296 · DOI · Paper page
- Freeman R. Edward, 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective
- Greene William H., 2008, Econometric Analysis
- JohnsonMarilyn F., PorterSusan L., and Shackell-DowellMargaret B. (1997), “Stakeholder Pressure and the Structure of Executive Compensation,” (accessed October 26, 2015), [available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=41780]. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.41780
- 10.1509/jm.75.1.16 · doi:10.1509/jm.75.1.16 · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00083-6 · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00083-6
- 10.4337/9781781005224.00037 · doi:10.4337/9781781005224.00037
- 10.1509/jmkr.46.3.293 · doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.3.293
Cited by
Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5 · Cited by 1,923
Li, G., Li, L., Choi, T., & Sethi, S. P. (2020) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1061 · Cited by 423
The Impact of Voluntary Sustainability Reporting on Firm Value: Insights from Signaling Theory
Friske, W., Hoelscher, S. A., & Nikolov, A. N. (2023) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-022-00879-2 · Cited by 249
Economic Analysis of Widespread Adoption of CSR and Sustainability Reporting Standards
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3315673 · Cited by 67
Mathras, D., Grinstein, A., Young, G. J., Thai, N. H., & Young, S. B. (2023) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/07439156221134803 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-46
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W1748689366
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 38.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Wealth: The Role of Marketing Capability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jm.15.0013
- The paper
- Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Wealth: The Role of Marketing Capability. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.