Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Wealth: The Role of Marketing Capability

Mishra, Saurabh, Modi, Sachin B.·2016·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

Despite the positive societal implications of corporate social responsibility (CSR), there remains an extensive debate regarding its consequences for firm shareholders. This study posits that marketing capability plays a complementary role in the CSR–shareholder wealth relationship. It further argues that the influence of marketing capability will be higher for CSR types with verifiable benefits to firm stakeholders (i.e., consumers, employees, channel partners, and regulators). An analysis utilizing secondary information for a large sample of 1,725 firms for the years 2000–2009 indicates that the effects of overall CSR efforts on stock returns and idiosyncratic risk are not significant on their own but only become so in the presence of marketing capability. Furthermore, the results reveal that although marketing capability has positive interaction effects with verifiable CSR efforts—environment (e.g., using clean energy), products (e.g., providing to economically disadvantaged), diversity (e.g., pursuing diversity in top management), corporate governance (e.g., limiting board compensation), and employees (e.g., supporting unions)—on stock returns (and negative interaction effects with these CSR efforts on idiosyncratic risk), it has no significant interaction effect with community-based efforts (e.g., charitable giving).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1509/jm.15.0013

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. BlairSean and AlexanderChernev (2012), “Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Social Goodwill,” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series, Report 12-103. · doi:10.1037/e620972012-120
  2. 10.1177/002224299706100106 · doi:10.1177/002224299706100106 · Paper page
  3. 10.5465/amr.1979.4498296 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Freeman R. Edward, 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective
  5. Greene William H., 2008, Econometric Analysis
  6. JohnsonMarilyn F., PorterSusan L., and Shackell-DowellMargaret B. (1997), “Stakeholder Pressure and the Structure of Executive Compensation,” (accessed October 26, 2015), [available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=41780]. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.41780
  7. 10.1509/jm.75.1.16 · doi:10.1509/jm.75.1.16 · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00083-6 · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00083-6
  9. 10.4337/9781781005224.00037 · doi:10.4337/9781781005224.00037
  10. 10.1509/jmkr.46.3.293 · doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.3.293

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B.
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
2016-01
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
26-46
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W1748689366
Cited by
279
References
76
FWCI
38.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Wealth: The Role of Marketing Capability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jm.15.0013
The paper
Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Wealth: The Role of Marketing Capability. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.