The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance Productivity and Quality of Frontline Employees in Service Organizations
Abstract
To understand mechanisms that govern the productivity and quality of frontline employees (FLEs), this study (1) provides a conceptual distinction between frontline productivity and quality, (2) proposes an extended role theory–based model for mapping the influence of key antecedents and consequences of FLE productivity and quality, and (3) examines the effects of coping resources—boss support and task control—in helping employees cope with the inherent productivity–quality tension in frontline jobs. Using data from 159 customer service and 147 bill collection representatives, the author examines proposed hypotheses through multiple-group path analysis. The results indicate support for the distinction between productivity and quality. Moreover, with increasing burnout levels, FLEs are found to maintain their productivity levels while their quality deteriorates directly. Relative to boss support, task control emerges as a more powerful resource in aiding FLEs in coping with role tension. Key implications for theory and practice regarding FLE management and effectiveness are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Stress, Coping, and Social Support Processes: Where Are We? What Next?
Thoits, P. A. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2626957 · Cited by 3,496 · cited 3×
“The second resource, boss support, is drawn from social support literature (Thoits 1995) and the path–goal theory of leadership.”
BackgroundInfluentialA meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout
Lee, R. T., & Ashforth, B. E. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.123 · Cited by 3,262
Robert J. Hockey, G. (1997) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(96)05223-4 · Cited by 1,753
Cited by
Sources of social support and burnout: a meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model
Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1134 · Cited by 1,336
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Martínez, I., & Bresó, E. (2010) · Anxiety, Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615800802609965 · Cited by 612
Alexandrov, A., Lilly, B., & Babakus, E. (2013) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-012-0323-4 · Cited by 448
Past performance and future perspectives of burnout research
Schaufeli, W. B. (2003) · SA Journal of Industrial Psychology · doi:10.4102/sajip.v29i4.127 · Cited by 309
Technology-driven service strategy
Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0545-6 · Cited by 263
The Impact of Islamic Banks’ Service Quality Perception on Jordanian Customers Loyalty
Alshurideh, D. M. T., Al-Hawary, S. I. S., Mohammad, A. M. E., Al-Hawary, A. A., & Al Kurdi, B. H. (2017) · Journal of Management Research · doi:10.5296/jmr.v9i2.10664 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 15-34
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2122078595
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.