Cited by 448Digital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationMarketing and Advertising Strategies

The effects of social- and self-motives on the intentions to share positive and negative word of mouth

Alexandrov, Aliosha, Lilly, Bryan, Babakus, Emin·2013·Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11747-012-0323-4

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Referral behavior of innovative offerings helps consumers present themselves favorably, fulfilling their self-enhancement needs.

    “As viable tools for public self-enhancement (Alexandrov et al. 2013; Wojnicki and Godes 2008), referral behavior of innovative offerings helps consumers present themselves favorably, fulfilling their self-enhancement needs.”
  • In the pretest, participants in the more innovative condition expressed greater expected satisfaction of self-enhancement needs than participants in the less innovative condition (M = 4.02 vs. 2.96, t(55) = -2.59, p < .05).

    “They also expressed greater expected satisfaction of self-enhancement needs than participants in the less innovative condition ( M moreinnovative = 4.02; M lessinnovative = 2.96; t (55) = -2.59, p &lt; .05) on a three-item scale from Alexandrov et al. (2013).”
  • In Study 2 pretest, participants in the more innovative condition expected greater satisfaction of self-enhancement needs than participants in the less innovative condition (M = 5.53 vs. 4.43; t(49) = -5.74, p < .001).

    “and expected greater satisfaction of self-enhancement needs ( M moreinnovative = 5.53; M lessinnovative = 4.43; t (49) = -5.74, p &lt; .001) on a three-item scale from Alexandrov et al. (2013) than participants in the less innovative condition.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexandrov, A., Lilly, B., & Babakus, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Alexandrov, Aliosha
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published
2013-01-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
531-546
ISSN
  • 0092-0703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7824
OpenAlex
W2073774300
Cited by
448
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
62.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
Keywords
word of mouth, social motives, self-enhancement, self-affirmation, social comparison, social bonding, positive word of mouth, negative word-of-mouth, social interaction, consumer motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review