The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Integrated Networks Model: Explaining Resource Allocations in Network Markets
Open accessAbstract
The last decade has witnessed a shift from a focus on the value created by a single firm and product to an examination of the value created by networks of firms (or product ecosystems) in which assets are comingled with external entities. The authors examine these market-based assets in the context of network markets and propose an Integrated Networks model in which three types of networks—user, complements, and producer—add value or enhance the attractiveness of the associated focal product. The authors empirically test the proposed model by surveying information technology professionals on their resource allocation decisions regarding the Unix and Windows NT operating systems. The findings suggest that the value added by these three networks is significantly and positively associated with resources allocated by business customers to competing products. The results also show that the three networks mediate the relationship between stand-alone product performance and resource allocation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378802500207 · Cited by 6,293
Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History
(1995) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036867 · Cited by 1,175
On the Meaning of within-Factor Correlated Measurement Errors
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208993 · Cited by 526
Cited by
Customer Participation and the Trade-Off between New Product Innovativeness and Speed to Market
Fang, E. (. (2008) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.4.090 · Cited by 648
Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation
Swaminathan, V., & Moorman, C. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.5.52 · Cited by 403
Complexity of service value networks: Conceptualization and empirical investigation
Basole, R. C., & Rouse, W. B. (2008) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.471.0053 · Cited by 401
The effects of religion on consumer behavior: A conceptual framework and research agenda
Mathras, D., Cohen, A. B., Mandel, N., & Mick, D. G. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.08.001 · Cited by 399
Role of competences in creating customer value: A value-creation logic approach
Möller, K. (2006) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.005 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Frels, J. K., Shervani, T., & Srivastava, R. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-45
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2110483683
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 30.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Integrated Networks Model: Explaining Resource Allocations in Network Markets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.67.1.29.18586
- The paper
- Frels, J. K., Shervani, T., & Srivastava, R. K. (2003). The Integrated Networks Model: Explaining Resource Allocations in Network Markets. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.1.29.18586
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.