The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Subareas over Time
Abstract
The authors investigate the overall and subarea influence of a comprehensive set of marketing and marketing-related journals at three points in time during a 30-year period using a citation-based measure of structural influence. The results show that a few journals wield a disproportionate amount of influence in the marketing journal network as a whole and that influential journals tend to derive their influence from many different journals. Different journals are most influential in different subareas of marketing; general business and managerially oriented journals have lost influence, whereas more specialized marketing journals have gained in influence over time. The Journal of Marketing emerges as the most influential marketing journal in the final period (1996–97) and as the journal with the broadest span of influence across all subareas. Yet the Journal of Marketing is notably influential among applied marketing journals, which themselves are of lesser influence. The index of structural influence is significantly correlated with other objective and subjective measures of influence but least so with the impact factors reported in the Social Sciences Citation Index. Overall, the findings demonstrate the rapid maturation of the marketing discipline and the changing role of key journals in the process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Garfield, E. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471 · Cited by 2,788
Cited by
An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6 · Cited by 8,088
Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.2.24.60761 · Cited by 2,182
The Decline of Conceptual Articles and Implications for Knowledge Development
Yadav, M. S. (2010) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.1.1 · Cited by 578
The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact
Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.3.171 · Cited by 400
Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals
Stremersch, S., Camacho, N., Vanneste, S., & Verniers, I. (2015) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.09.004 · Cited by 102
Journal Evolution and the Development of Marketing
Lehmann, D. R. (2005) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.24.1.137.63891 · Cited by 68
Bordignon, F. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03536-z · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-139
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W1994333330
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.