The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are All Smiles Created Equal? How Emotional Contagion and Emotional Labor Affect Service Relationships
Abstract
In this study, the authors examine the effects of two facets of employee emotions on customers’ assessments of service encounters. Drawing on emotional contagion and emotional labor theories, they investigate the influence of the extent of service employees’ display of positive emotions and the authenticity of their emotional labor display on customers’ emotional states and, subsequently, on customers’ assessments of the service interaction and their relationship with the service provider. To test the study hypotheses, 223 consumers participated in a simulated service encounter in which actors played the roles of service employees. In a 2 × 2 factorial design, the employees varied both the extent of their smiling behavior and their emotional labor display by engaging in surface or deep acting. The results show that the authenticity of employees’ emotional labor display directly affects customers’ emotional states. However, contrary to expectations, the extent of employee smiling does not influence customer emotions, providing no support for the existence of primitive emotional contagion in service interactions. Furthermore, employee emotions exert an influence on customer outcomes that are of interest to marketers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251929 · Cited by 12,003
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience
Fornell, C. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252129 · Cited by 5,641
Oliver, R. L. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429990634s105 · Cited by 4,898
The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior
Barsade, S. G. (2002) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094912 · Cited by 3,361
An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction
Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151722 · Cited by 2,914
SERVICE WITH A SMILE: EMOTIONAL CONTAGION IN THE SERVICE ENCOUNTER.
Pugh, S. D. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069445 · Cited by 1,393 · cited 3×
“In the context of service interactions, emotional contagion creates a ripple effect of emotions from service employees to customers (Pugh 2001; Tsai and Huang 2002; Verbeke 1997).”
The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0104_1 · Cited by 960
Encounter Satisfaction versus Overall Satisfaction versus Quality: The Customer's Voice
Bitner, M. J., & Hubbert, A. R. (1994) · Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice · doi:10.4135/9781452229102.n3 · Cited by 852
Should we delight the customer?
Rust, R. T., & Oliver, R. L. (2000) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070300281008 · Cited by 712
The Collective Construction of Work Group Moods
Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667070 · Cited by 678
Cited by
An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM
Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001 · Cited by 2,906
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x · Cited by 2,712
Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002 · Cited by 1,532
van Doorn, J., Mende, M., Noble, S. M., Hulland, J., Ostrom, A. L., Grewal, D., & Petersen, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670516679272 · Cited by 1,344
Emotional Labor at a Crossroads: Where Do We Go from Here?
Grandey, A. A., & Gabriel, A. S. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111400 · Cited by 664
Metadata
- Authors
- Hennig-Thurau, T., Groth, M., Paul, M., & Gremler, D. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 58-73
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2124088225
- Cited by
- 1,049
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 71.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
