The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emotional Labor at a Crossroads: Where Do We Go from Here?
Abstract
Three decades after its introduction as a concept, emotional labor—regulating emotions as part of the work role—is fully on the map in organizational behavior and organizational psychology. As research has accelerated, roadblocks, such as fuzzy construct conceptualizations, assumed but untested processes, and methodological stagnation, have emerged. To provide direction to new scholars and suggestions to seasoned emotional labor researchers, we review theoretical perspectives and evidence for emotional labor and its (a) construct development and measurement, (b) chronic and momentary determinants, (c) prediction of employee well-being, and (d) influence on organizational performance. On this path, we introduce emotional labor as a dynamic integration of three components (i.e., emotional requirements, emotion regulation, and emotion performance), interpret personal and organizational moderators, and point to innovative new methodological approaches. Overall, we provide a new road map to jump-start the field in exciting new directions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Uber and Lyft workers often find their work emotionally taxing because they have to engage in emotional labor to gain favorable customer ratings.
“Research has shown that Uber and Lyft workers often find their work emotionally taxing (Malin & Chandler, 2017) because they have to engage in emotional labor to gain favorable customer ratings (Grandey & Gabriel, 2015;Marquis et al., 2018).”
From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Grandey & Gabriel, 2015
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 · Cited by 9,916
Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247 · Cited by 4,510
The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior
Barsade, S. G. (2002) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094912 · Cited by 3,361
Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027600 · Cited by 2,006 · cited 2×
“Overall, the mismatch in concept and measurement may explain why relationships found for (person-level) surface acting and deep acting (Hülsheger & Schewe 2011) are sometimes contradictory with experimental (event/emotion-level) evidence (Webb et al. 2012).”
BackgroundResultEmotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model
Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017286 · Cited by 1,722
Hülsheger, U. R., Alberts, H. J. E. M., Feinholdt, A., & Lang, J. W. B. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031313 · Cited by 1,433
SERVICE WITH A SMILE: EMOTIONAL CONTAGION IN THE SERVICE ENCOUNTER.
Pugh, S. D. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069445 · Cited by 1,393
Bonanno, G. A., Papa, A., Lalande, K., Westphal, M., & Coifman, K. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00705.x · Cited by 969 · cited 1×
“Another new approach in EI research is to directly measure the ability to enhance or suppress emotional expressions when instructed to; this ability seems to be effective for interpersonal functioning (Bonanno et al. 2004, Côté et al. 2010) and is likely to help at work as well.”
BackgroundRegulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work
Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2972 · Cited by 964
Mauss, I. B., Bunge, S. A., & Gross, J. J. (2007) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00005.x · Cited by 538 · cited 1×
“However, emotion regulation (particularly cognitive regulation, known as deep acting)may become automatic and thus easier for the actor (Mauss et al. 2007).”
BackgroundGet mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations
Sinaceur, M., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.05.002 · Cited by 458
A classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies.
Niven, K., Totterdell, P., & Holman, D. (2009) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0015962 · Cited by 364
Pugh, S. D., Groth, M., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021395 · Cited by 350
Emotional plasticity: Conditions and effects of improving emotional competence in adulthood.
Kotsou, I., Nelis, D., Grégoire, J., & Mikolajczak, M. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023047 · Cited by 335
Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610387438 · Cited by 162
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 135
- 10.1037/10173-023 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10869-013-9288-7 · DOI
- 10.1080/08959281003621695 · DOI
- Arvey RD, 1998, Res. Pers. Hum. Resourc. Manag., 16, 103
- 10.2307/258824 · DOI
- Ashkanasy NM, 2011, The SAGE Handbook of Leadership, 365
- 10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478695 · DOI · Paper page
- Barsade SG, 2003, Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science, 3
- Beal DJ, Trougakos JP. 2013. Episodic intrapersonal emotion regulation: or, dealing with life as it happens. See Grandey et al. 2013c, pp. 31–55
- Becker WJ, Cropanzano R, Butts M. 2014. Emotion regulation in work teams: a social information processing approach . Presented at Annu. Conf. Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol., 29th, May 15–17, Honolulu, HI
- Bhave DP, 2015, J. Manag.
- 10.1177/0950017003017002004 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2011.0272 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Bono JE, 2005, Emotions in Organizational Behavior, 213
- 10.1037/1076-8998.12.2.177 · DOI
- 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1815 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8998.7.1.57 · DOI
- 10.1348/096317903769647229 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMR.2008.31193163 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.617 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0022884 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2005.17293692 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0956797611416251 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0021156 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.174 · DOI
- Côté S, Van Kleef GA, Sy T. 2013. The social effects of emotion regulation in organizations. See Grandey et al. 2013c, pp. 79–100
- Dahling JJ, Johnson HM. 2010. Promoting good service: the effects of trait and state regulatory focus on emotional labor . Presented at Annu. Conf. Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol., 25th, Apr. 8–10, Atlanta, GA
- Dahling JJ, Johnson HM. 2013. Motivation, fit, confidence, and skills: How do individual differences influence emotional labor? See Grandey et al. 2013c, pp. 57–78
- 10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.009 · DOI
- 10.1080/08959280802137911 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0021725 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.230 · DOI
- Diefendorff JM, 2015, Appl. Psychol.
- 10.1007/s11031-010-9167-8 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.284 · DOI
- 10.1348/096317905X68484 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00470.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.963 · DOI
- 10.1177/0730888497024002004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10869-013-9329-2 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0037408 · DOI
- Gabriel AS, Diefendorff JM. 2015. Emotional labor dynamics: a momentary approach. Acad. Manag. J . In press. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.1135 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.011 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.63 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.700 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00038-1 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.301 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1256 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95 · DOI
- 10.2307/30040678 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/peps.12037 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/job.637 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.252 · DOI
- Grandey AA, Diefendorff JM, Rupp DE. 2013b. Bringing emotional labor into focus: a review and integration of three research lenses. See Grandey et al. 2013c, pp. 3–27
- 10.4324/9780203100851 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.893 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0025102 · DOI
- Grandey AA, Houston L. 2013. Keepin’ it real: race and performance ratings of positive displays . Presented at Symp., Annu. Conf. Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol., 28th, Apr. 11–13, Houston, TX
- 10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.63 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199337538.013.8 · DOI
- 10.1108/09564231011050805 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2011.0035 · DOI
- 10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781 · DOI · Paper page
- Groth M, 2005, J. Manag., 31, 7
- Groth M, 2012, Organ. Psychol. Rev., 2, 208
- 10.5465/amj.2009.44634116 · DOI · Paper page
- Hatfield E, 1994, Emotional Contagion
- 10.1509/jmkg.70.3.058 · DOI
- 10.1037//0003-066X.44.3.513 · DOI · Paper page
- Hochschild AR, 1983, The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling
- 10.1023/A:1015194108376 · DOI
- 10.1080/10615800903254091 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0021003 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0038229 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0022876 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.319 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01129.x · DOI
- 10.1111/peps.12009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.018 · DOI
- 10.1111/peps.12028 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00658.x · DOI
- Maneotis S. 2014. Citizenship is in the eye of the beholder: citizenship from customers predicts employee strain depending on contextual and perceptual factors . PhD Thesis, Pa. State Univ., Univ. Park
- 10.1080/08959285.2013.854366 · DOI
- 10.1111/aphw.12009 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.1934 · DOI
- McCance AS, 2013, J. Manag., 39, 392
- Mesmer-Magnus JR, 2012, Organ. Psychol. Rev., 2, 6
- 10.1207/s15327043hup1904_2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11031-012-9301-x · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167203029007008 · DOI
- 10.1002/job.1798 · DOI
- Pugh SD, Diefendorff JM, Moran CM. 2013. Emotional labor: organization-level influences, strategies, and outcomes. See Grandey et al. 2013c, pp. 199–221
- 10.5465/amr.1987.4306444 · DOI
- 10.2307/256584 · DOI
- Rupp DE, 2008, J. Manag., 34, 903
- 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.971 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<163::AID-JOB37>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
- 10.5465/AMJ.2011.59215086 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2010.1050 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0020723 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0013804 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393355 · DOI
- 10.2307/256456 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.295 · DOI
- 10.2307/20159579 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.848 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1076-8998.8.1.55 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0038082 · DOI
- 10.5465/AMJ.2008.30764063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0021880 · DOI
- 10.1177/014920630102700406 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.1001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/096317905X39666 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.57 · DOI
- Van Kleef GA, 2012, Organ. Psychol. Rev., 2, 311
- Van Maanen J, 1989, Res. Organ. Behav., 11, 43
- 10.1080/1359432X.2013.839548 · DOI
- 10.1111/peps.12044 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/08959280802540957 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0034428 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2011.60263093 · DOI
- 10.1177/0730888493020002004 · DOI
- 10.2307/258905 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00440.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.917 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02011.x · DOI
- 10.1080/08959280701332034 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Working on my own: Measuring the challenges of gig work
Caza, B. B., Reid, E. M., Ashford, S. J., & Granger, S. (2022) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267211030098 · Cited by 249
Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research
Wu, D., & Huang, J. L. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2775 · Cited by 168
Affectivity, Emotional Labor, Emotional Exhaustion, and Emotional Intelligence in Coaching
Lee, Y. H., & Chelladurai, P. (2016) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200.2015.1092481 · Cited by 107
An Ethical Analysis of Emotional Labor
Barry, B., Olekalns, M., & Rees, L. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3906-2 · Cited by 46
Hong, D., & Kim, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265581 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Grandey, A. A., & Gabriel, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2015-04-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 323-349
- ISSN
- 2327-0608 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-0616
- OpenAlex
- W2118004681
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 86 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
- Keywords
- emotional labor, emotion regulation, employee well-being, organizational performance, moderators, construct measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review