The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transaction Decoupling: How Price Bundling Affects the Decision to Consume
Abstract
In today's marketplace, price bundling is widespread: Manufacturers and retailers routinely offer multiple products for a single, bundled price. Although the effects of price bundling on purchase behavior have been well researched, the effects of price bundling on postpurchase consumption behavior have received almost no attention. In this article, the authors build on the sunk cost literature (e.g., Thaler 1980 , 1985 ) and predict that price bundling leads to a disassociation or “decoupling” of transaction costs and benefits, thereby reducing attention to sunk costs and decreasing a consumer's likelihood of consuming a paid-for service (e.g., a theater performance). Four studies show this to be the case. In two lab studies, the authors show that having a bundled four-day ski pass as opposed to four one-day ski tickets decreases a person's likelihood of skiing on the final day of a four-day ski vacation. They replicate this result in a field study, showing that multiperformance ticket holders are more likely to forgo a given theatrical performance than are single-performance ticket holders, all else held constant. In a final study, the authors show that the decreased attention to sunk costs brought about by price bundling can be either cognitively driven (i.e., it is difficult to allocate a single payment across multiple benefits) or motivationally driven (i.e., there is an underlying desire to avoid consumption). Their findings have practical implications for managers interested in predicting or influencing actual product consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
Toward a positive theory of consumer choice
Thaler, R. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 · Cited by 5,505
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,415
Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4 · Cited by 2,573 · cited 12×
“It is well documented that consumers consider historic, nonrecoverable transaction costs when deciding on a future course of action (Arkes and Blumer 1985; Garland and Newport 1991; Simonson and Staw 1992; Staw 1976; Thaler 1980).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKnee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action
Staw, B. M. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2 · Cited by 2,061
The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt
Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.17.1.4 · Cited by 1,366
The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress
Brockner, J. (1992) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258647 · Cited by 1,055
Strategic Bundling of Products and Prices: A New Synthesis for Marketing
Stremersch, S., & Tellis, G. J. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.1.55.18455 · Cited by 788
Cited by
Strategic Bundling of Products and Prices: A New Synthesis for Marketing
Stremersch, S., & Tellis, G. J. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.1.55.18455 · Cited by 788
Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. (2002) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.3.321.19111 · Cited by 234
Creating and capturing value from freemium business models: A demand‐side perspective
Rietveld, J. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1279 · Cited by 157
Consumption Effects of Bundling: Consumer Perceptions, Firm Actions, and Public Policy Implications
Sharpe, K. M., & Staelin, R. (2010) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.29.2.170 · Cited by 72
Marketing tactics discouraging price search: Deception and competition
Lindsey-Mullikin, J., & Petty, R. D. (2011) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.003 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Soman, D., & Gourville, J. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-44
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2003217648
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 26.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transaction Decoupling: How Price Bundling Affects the Decision to Consume. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.30.18828
- The paper
- Soman, D., & Gourville, J. T. (2001). Transaction Decoupling: How Price Bundling Affects the Decision to Consume. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.30.18828
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.