The DOI matches its Crossref record.
When Are Stockpiled Products Consumed Faster? A Convenience–Salience Framework of Postpurchase Consumption Incidence and Quantity
Open accessAbstract
When people stockpile products, how do they decide when and how much they will consume? To answer this question, the authors develop a framework that shows how the salience and convenience of products influence postpurchase consumption incidence and quantity. Multiple research methods—including scanner data analysis, a field study, and two laboratory studies—show that stockpiling increases product salience and triggers consumption incidence among high-convenience products. However, when the decision is made to consume a product, stockpiling increases the consumption quantity for both high- and low-convenience products. In addition to providing new insights on how consumers make postpurchase consumption decisions, these results have implications for the debate on the value of promotions that induce stockpiling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At the consumer level, planning, shopping, and stockpiling routines are important predictors of waste.
“At the consumer level, planning, shopping and stockpiling routines are important predictors of waste (Wansink and Deshpand e, 1994;Chandon and Wansink, 2002;Stefan et al., 2013).”
From Food waste paradox: antecedents of food disposal in low income households (2015) · cites this paper as Chandon and Wansink, 2002
The available copy contains the paper’s title and citation metadata, but no substantive passage connecting planning, shopping, or stockpiling routines to waste. Searches for waste and those consumer routines returned no such passage; the title concerns consumption of stockpiled products, not waste. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWaste can be increased by the overpreparation of stockpiled foods.
“Waste can also be increased by the overpreparation of these stockpiled foods (Chandon and Wansink, 2002), or by the over-serving that can occur because of large serving bowls or plates (Wansink and van Ittersum, 2014;Wansink et al., 2014).”
From Food waste paradox: antecedents of food disposal in low income households (2015) · cites this paper as Chandon and Wansink, 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1177/002224379803500309 · DOI
- Alba Joseph W., 1991, Handbook of Consumer Behavior, 1
- 10.1287/mnsc.39.5.517 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mksc.18.4.504 · DOI
- 10.1016/0023-9690(87)90017-8 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224298104500111 · DOI
- Blattberg Robert C., 1990, Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods, and Strategies.
- Chandon Pierre, 2001, “Measuring the Value of Point-of-Purchase Marketing with Commercial Eye-Tracking Data,”
- 10.1509/jmkg.64.4.65.18071 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/208507 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/209451 · DOI
- 10.1086/209362 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02230383 · DOI
- 10.1086/209533 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224378802500402 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224299405800402 · DOI
- 10.1086/208573 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224379403100401 · DOI
- 10.1086/321950 · DOI
- 10.1086/296298 · DOI
- 10.1002/bdm.3960050304 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224379403100107 · DOI
- 10.1287/mksc.13.4.351 · DOI
- 10.1086/209359 · DOI
- 10.1086/208556 · DOI
- 10.1287/mksc.4.2.147 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00557313 · DOI
- 10.1287/mksc.20.1.1.10197 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmkr.37.4.397.18788 · DOI
- 10.1287/mksc.17.1.4 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224379903600302 · DOI
- 10.1086/208881 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224299505900301 · DOI
- 10.1086/209105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0026285 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224379002700203 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmkr.38.1.30.18828 · DOI
- Sudman Seymour, 2002, Consumer Panels
- 10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mksc.14.2.148 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224379403100405 · DOI
- 10.1177/1077727X94232005 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224299606000301 · DOI
- Wansink Brian, 2000, Journal of Family and Consumer Science, 91, 93
- 10.1007/BF00993961 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224379803500108 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224299606000104 · DOI
- 10.1287/mksc.17.4.317 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.26.1.78 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS THAT INCREASE THE FOOD INTAKE AND CONSUMPTION VOLUME OF UNKNOWING CONSUMERS
Wansink, B. (2004) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132140 · Cited by 1,036
Self-citationFood waste paradox: antecedents of food disposal in low income households
Porpino, G., Parente, J., & Wansink, B. (2015) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12207 · Cited by 334
Self-citationDietary Implications of Supermarket Development: A Global Perspective
Hawkes, C. (2008) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2008.00428.x · Cited by 328
How Package Design and Packaged‐based Marketing Claims Lead to Overeating
Chandon, P. (2013) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/pps028 · Cited by 249
Self-citationPackage Unit Size and Amount of Food: Do Both Influence Intake?
Raynor, H. A., & Wing, R. R. (2007) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2007.274 · Cited by 89
Could Behavioral Economics Help Improve Diet Quality for Nutrition Assistance Program Participants?
Just, D. R., Mancino, L., & Wansink, B. (2007) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e667842007-001 · Cited by 85
Self-citationJilcott, S. B., Keyserling, T., Crawford, T., McGuirt, J. T., & Ammerman, A. S. (2011) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2011.01.010 · Cited by 82
From Default to Choice: Adding Healthy Options to Kids’ Menus
McCluskey, J. J., Mittelhammer, R. C., & Asiseh, F. (2012) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aar106 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Chandon, P., & Wansink, B.
- Affiliations
- INSEAD (FR)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 321-335
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2000696649
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 13.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing Research (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Keywords
- stockpiling, promotion, purchase decision
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review