The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Design for Multinomial Choice Experiments
Abstract
The author derives D-optimal designs for main-effects, multinomial choice experiments using attribute levels as design parameters. The design solutions are similar to standard main-effects designs except that one attribute is used to manipulate response probabilities. The manipulator is key to implementing optimal designs in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Cragg, J. G., & Zarembka, P. (1975) · The Canadian Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/134075 · Cited by 8,342
Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
Green, P. E., Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172747 · Cited by 4,333
Louviere, J. J., & Woodworth, G. (1983) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378302000403 · Cited by 1,394
Ben-Akiva (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,371
The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models
Swait, J., & Louviere, J. (1993) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379303000303 · Cited by 1,217
The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs
Huber, J., & Zwerina, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379603300305 · Cited by 1,100
Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications
Kuhfeld, W. F., Tobias, R. D., & Garratt, M. (1994) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379403100408 · Cited by 764
Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, the
(2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1316 · Cited by 720
Gutiérrez, Ó. D. M. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_748 · Cited by 642
Cited by
Bridges, J. F. P., Hauber, A. B., Marshall, D., Lloyd, A., Prosser, L. A., Regier, D. A., Johnson, F. R., & Mauskopf, J. (2011) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013 · Cited by 2,029
Reed Johnson, F., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D., Kilambi, V., Mühlbacher, A., Regier, D. A., Bresnahan, B. W., Kanninen, B., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223 · Cited by 1,799
Self-citationConstructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs
Rose, J. M., & Bliemer, M. C. J. (2009) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441640902827623 · Cited by 797
Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives
Rose, J. M., Bliemer, M. C. J., Hensher, D. A., & Collins, A. T. (2008) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2007.09.002 · Cited by 528
Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers' Prior Beliefs
SÁndor, Z., & Wedel, M. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.4.430.18904 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanninen, B. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 214-227
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2089707535
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 11.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Design for Multinomial Choice Experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkr.39.2.214.19080
- The paper
- Kanninen, B. J. (2002). Optimal Design for Multinomial Choice Experiments. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.2.214.19080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
