Cited by 12Fluid Dynamics and MixingFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFlow Measurement and Analysis

Benchmarking Radioactive Particle Tracking (RPT) with Laser Doppler Anemometry (LDA)

Upadhyay, Rajesh K., Roy, Shantanu, Pant, Harish J.·2012·International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering

Abstract

In current work, Radioactive Particle Tracking (RPT) experiment has been performed in a rectangular bubble column having dimensions reported by Pfleger et al. (1999). As has been reported in recent decades, RPT has come to be accepted now as a reliable and versatile non-invasive flow measurement technique for mapping the flow fields in multiphase reactors.In this work, the objective has been to benchmark RPT (which is a very versatile technique) against reported data (Pfleger et al. 1999) with Laser Doppler Anemometry (LDA) (which is claimed to be a very accurate technique at low volume fractions of the dispersed phase). We show that RPT does remarkably well both in terms of versatility and accuracy. Overall, this work helps to establish the accuracy standards of the RPT technique.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/1542-6580.2880

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vieira et al. [308] found time-averaged axial liquid velocity and gas hold-up compare well against experimental results; modified k-# model delivers the best results, being a good compromise between simplicity and accuracy.

    “Nevertheless, the time-averaged axial liquid velocity and the gas hold-up compare well against experimental results [158,309,310]. They conclude that the modified k -# model delivers the best results, being a good compromise between simplicity of modeling and accuracy of the predictions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Upadhyay, R. K., Roy, S., & Pant, H. J.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
  • Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (IN)
Corresponding author
Upadhyay, Rajesh K.
Venue
International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering
Published
2012-07-30
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
1542-6580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326298236
Cited by
12
References
19
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Flow Measurement and Analysis
Keywords
radioactive particle tracking, laser Doppler anemometry, benchmarking, bubble column, multiphase flow, dispersed phase, non-invasive flow measurement, measurement accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review