Cited by 125Fluid Dynamics and MixingMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesGranular flow and fluidized beds

Euler-Euler simulation of bubbly flow in a rectangular bubble column: Experimental validation with Radioactive Particle Tracking

Gupta, Ankur, Roy, Shantanu·2013·Chemical Engineering Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.012

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gupta and Roy [315] tested four drag models (Schiller and Naumann, Ishii and Zuber, Tomiyama, and Zhang-Vanderhyden) and realized that all of them yield almost identical results.

    “Besides, the authors also tested four drag models, i.e., Schiller and Naumann, Ishii and Zuber, Tomiyama, and Zhang-Vanderhyden, and realized that all of them yield almost identical results.”
  • Gupta and Roy [315] concluded that the choice of the solution method of the PBE does not have a significant impact on the results.

    “The authors concluded that the choice of the solution method of the PBE does not have a significant impact on the results.”
  • Gupta and Roy [315] found that use of a constant lift coefficient yields the best match between experiments and simulations in terms of time-averaged liquid velocity profile, while the Tomiyama model overpredicts the profile at the center of the column.

    “Perhaps surprisingly, the use of a constant lift coefficient yield the best match between experiments and simulations in terms of time-averaged liquid velocity profile, while the model of Tomiyama overpredicts the profile at the center of the column.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, A., & Roy, S.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Corresponding author
Roy, Shantanu
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
225
Pages
818-836
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997460027
Cited by
125
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
Keywords
bubbly flow, Euler-Euler two-phase model, bubble size distribution, quadrature method of moments, direct quadrature method of moments, radioactive particle tracking, drag force, lift force, air-water flow, velocity profiles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review