Cited by 1,622Epistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsFeminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesEducation, Politics, and Culture Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Fate of Knowledge

Longino, Helen E.·2002·Princeton University Press eBooks

DOI 10.1515/9780691187013

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Preface and Acknowledgments ix Chapter One: Introduction: The Rational-Social Dichotomy 1 Chapter Two: Taking Social Studies of Science Seriously 11 Chapter Three: The Philosophers Respond 42 Chapter Four: Disassembling the Rational-Social Dichotomy 77 Chapter Five: Socializing Cognition 97 Chapter Six: Socializing Knowledge 124 Chapter Seven: Clarifications and Responses 145 Chapter Eight: Pluralism and Local Epistemolgies 175 Chapter Nine: Conclusion 203 References 215 Index 227

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780691187013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Still being checked.

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,001

Philosophical, Cognitive, and Sociological Roots for Connections in Chemistry Teaching and Learning
Wink, D. J. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470590591.ch1 · Cited by 3
A failing science: Understanding private landowners in the forestry milieu
Deane, P. (2004) · ANU Open Research (Australian National University) · doi:10.25911/5d7a2930ebc22 · Cited by 3
Elliott Sober, Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2008. Pp. xx + 392.
Brigandt, I. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1353/cjp.2011.0004 · Cited by 3
On the conditions for objectivity : how to avoid bias in socially relevant research
Jukola, S. (2015) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) · Cited by 3
Experts in the Climate Change Debate
Almassi, B. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118869109.ch10 · Cited by 3
Stéphanie Ruphy: Scientific Pluralism Reconsidered. A New Approach to the (Dis)Unity of Science
Sojka, M. M. (2018) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-018-9428-x · Cited by 3
Epistemological and ethical aspects of time in scientific research
Jadreškić, D. (2020) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.15488/10248 · Cited by 3
Values and Western Science Knowledge
Irzık, G. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_384 · Cited by 3
Fertilizaciones cruzadas entre la Psicología social de la ciencia y los estudios feministas de la ciencia
Dauder, S. G. (2003) · Athenea Digital Revista de pensamiento e investigación social · doi:10.5565/rev/athenea.89 · Cited by 2
Has There Been a Second Kuhnian Transformation in the Philosophical Image of Science?
Rouse, J. (2024) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64229-6_2 · Cited by 2
Research labs as distributed cognitive-cultural systems
Nersessian, N. J. (2024) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-024-00618-0 · Cited by 2
Empirical Underdetermination: The Empirical Side of the Duhem‐Quine Thesis
Caamaño‐Alegre, M. (2025) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.70022 · Cited by 2
Apoyo al hacer científico de estudiantes: análisis de actividades químicas en un software educativo
Sena, M. C. C., Nascimento, L. D. A., & Silva, F. C. (2025) · Educación Química · doi:10.22201/fq.18708404e.2025.2.88924 · Cited by 2
Epistemic Practices Created by Discursive Interactions between Pre-service Chemistry Teachers
Ramos, T. C., Silva, F. C., & Mendonça, P. C. C. (2025) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-025-00661-0 · Cited by 2
Love without borders: The relationship between intercultural marriage and family-to-work enrichment
Mercer, M. E., Ezzedeen, S. R., & Singh, P. (2025) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/14705958251357448 · Cited by 3
Situated learning and the problem of scientific inference
Affognon, D. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1725228 · Cited by 4
Can generative artificial intelligence be considered a cognitive subject? An analytic analysis
Gouveia, S. S., & Wang, Y. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02924-y · Cited by 2
Engaging Science Through Science Fiction: Regenerative Dialogues in a Brazilian University Extension Course
Arbo, J. B. (2026) · Public humanities. · doi:10.1017/pub.2026.10129 · Cited by 2
The Method is the Message: How Qualitative Research Has Advanced Constructivist Values in Psychology
Levitt, H. M., & Pierorazio, N. A. (2026) · Journal of Constructivist Psychology · doi:10.1080/10720537.2026.2655981 · Cited by 2
The Fateful Classroom
Böttcher, F., & Meisert, A. (2026) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-026-00732-w · Cited by 2
Science advice for policy: enhancing the legitimacy of non-epistemic value judgments through proportionality analysis
Langvatn, S. A., & Holst, C. (2026) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-026-00734-z · Cited by 2
Social regulation of epistemic thinking during collaborative inquiry with multiple documents
Barzilai, S., Talmon, I., & Chinn, C. A. (2026) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-026-09470-4 · Cited by 2
The Democratic Control of the Scientific Control of Politics
Brown, M. J. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_39 · Cited by 2
Integrating Heather Douglas’ Inductive Risk Framework with an Account of Scientific Evidence: Why and How?
Dede, O. Ç. (2020) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00358 · Cited by 2
Conducting more inclusive solar geoengineering research: A feminist science framework
Kravitz, B., & Sikka, T. (2022) · Environment and Planning E Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486221132831 · Cited by 2
An infrastructural account of scientific objectivity for legal contexts and bloodstain pattern analysis
Koolage, W. J., Williams, L. M., & Barroso, M. L. (2021) · Science in Context · doi:10.1017/s0269889722000011 · Cited by 2
Socio‐functional foundations in science: The case of measurement
Khalifa, K., & Goldberg, S. C. (2022) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12218 · Cited by 2
Perspective Chapter: Feminist Standpoint Theory – A Lens for Counseling Psychology Research and Practice
Suehn, M., Kassan, A., Russell‐Mayhew, S., Callaghan, T. D., & Cohen, J. A. (2023) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.110554 · Cited by 5
Can Truth Change? Philosophical Dialogue to Foster Pupils’ Reflection About (Mis)information
Schrijver, J. D., & Cornelissen, E. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25871-8_8 · Cited by 2
Use of Drawings and Connections Between Epistemic Practices in Grade 1 Science Lessons
Cappelle, V., Franco, L. G., & Munford, D. (2023) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-023-00458-z · Cited by 2
Ensino de Ciências por Investigação e Questões Sociocientíficas em Sala de Aula: Conexões a Partir da Análise de Práticas Epistêmicas
Silva, E. P. C., Franco, L. G., & Mendonça, P. C. C. (2024) · Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências · doi:10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2024u125153 · Cited by 2
Infusing epistemic perspectives on scientific practices in science teacher education
Erduran, S., Sarıbaş, D., & Kaya, E. (2023) · Éducation & didactique · doi:10.4000/educationdidactique.12227 · Cited by 2
The problems of macroeconomics as institutional problems: complementing the ‘what went wrong’ story with a social epistemology perspective
Lari, T. (2024) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/beae012 · Cited by 2
Unification, T-theoreticity, and Testing: The Case of Fitness in Natural Selection
Díez, J. A., Ginnobili, S., & Lorenzano, P. (2024) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-024-00826-3 · Cited by 2
Preregistration and predictivism
Choi, H. H. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04827-1 · Cited by 2
Perspectives and meta-perspectives: context versus hierarchy in the epistemology of complex systems
van der Merwe, R. (2025) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-025-00641-9 · Cited by 2
Do scientific communities understand? A fictionalist account
Khalifa, K., & Goldberg, S. C. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02356-2 · Cited by 2
Dismantling the Deficit Model of Science Communication Using Ludwik Fleck’s Theory of Thinking Collectives
Wang, V. M.-Y. (2025) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92958-8_6 · Cited by 2
UCEPs and Second-Order Science in the Era of Large Language Models: New Dimensions for Reflexive Scientific Practice
Lissack, M. R. (2025) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-025-10015-2 · Cited by 2
Karl Popper’s critical rationalism and the politics of liberal-communitarianism.
Afisi, O. T. (2015) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.26021/5136 · Cited by 2
Midrange Theory Evaluation to Advance Nursing Knowledge
Reed, P. G. (2022) · Nursing Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08943184221092426 · Cited by 2
A Way of Saving Normative Epistemology? Scientific Knowledge Without Standpoint Theories
Amoretti, M. C., & Vassallo, N. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_38 · Cited by 2
On the Marginalization of Feminist Philosophy
Landau, I. (2010) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2010.509404 · Cited by 2
The Productive Power of Ambiguity: Rethinking Homosexuality through the Virtual and Developmental Systems Theory
Burlein, A. (2005) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00372.x · Cited by 2
Economics, Geography, and Knowing “Development”
Sheppard, E. (2013) · Knowledge and space · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6131-5_8 · Cited by 3
Lacan, Freud, the humanities, and science.
Malone, K. R. (2012) · The Humanistic Psychologist · doi:10.1080/08873267.2012.696505 · Cited by 2
Identifying Difference, Engaging Dissent: What is at Stake in Democratizing Knowledge?
King, L. A., Morgan-Olsen, B., & Wong, J. (2014) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-014-9375-x · Cited by 2
Simulation, Representation, and Cartography: Compiling a Virtual Atlas
Lenhard, J. (2015) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00180 · Cited by 2
Standpoint Theory and the Possibility of Justice: A Lyotardian Critique of the Democratization of Knowledge
Grebowicz, M. (2007) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01317.x · Cited by 2
Virtue, Objectivity, and the Character of the Education Researcher
Burns, D. P., Piquette, C., & Norris, S. P. (2020) · Paideusis · doi:10.7202/1072339ar · Cited by 2
Taming Indeterminacy: The Co-production of Biodiversity Restoration, Flood Protection and Biophysical Modelling of Rivers and Coastal Environments
van Hemert, M. (2013) · Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1177/0971721813484376 · Cited by 2
A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable marketing : studying business–society relations through action research
García-Rosell, J.-C. (2009) · LaCRIS (University of Lapland) · Cited by 2
Rod vo vede: teoretické perspektívy a ich uplatnenie vo výskume
Szapuová, M. (2009) · Digitalni Knihovna - Knihovna Akademie věd ČR · Cited by 2
The value of the issue context approach for scientific policy advice
Tholen, B. (2015) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scv029 · Cited by 2
Economics Imperialism and Epistemic Cosmopolitanism
Rolin, K. H. (2015) · International Studies in the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1080/02698595.2015.1195145 · Cited by 2
A Woman’s Place: Place-Based Theory, Hermeneutics, and Feminism
Wesselius, J. C. (2017) · Contributions to hermeneutics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52214-2_34 · Cited by 2
Pluralidad científica y evaluación de riesgos
Pallitto, N. (2020) · Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia · doi:10.18270/rcfc.v19i39.2825 · Cited by 2
Bridging a Fault Line: On Underdetermination and the Ampliative Adequacy of Competing Theories
Axtell, G. S. (2014) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3_14 · Cited by 2
Collaborative Learning in Co-Created Digital Space
van Oostveen, R., Hunter, W. J., Childs, E., Barber, W., & Gerbrandt, J. (2021) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-6967-2.ch011 · Cited by 3
Nagel on the Methodology of the Social Sciences
Neuber, M. (2021) · Logic, epistemology, and the unity of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81010-8_11 · Cited by 2
Science for, in and with Society: Pragmatism by Default
Miedema, F. F. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2115-6_4 · Cited by 2
Insurgent Posthumanism
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478002321-006 · Cited by 2
Real-Time Space-Time Integration in GIScience and Geography
Richardson, D. B. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9205-9_21 · Cited by 2
ECOLOGICAL THINKING
Code, L. B. (2006) · doi:10.1093/0195159438.003.0002 · Cited by 2
¿Ciencia abierta para intereses privados? la lógica de la ciencia abierta y la comercialización de la investigación
Pinto, M. F. (2022) · Revista de Economía Institucional · doi:10.18601/01245996.v24n47.08 · Cited by 2
Is economics credible? A critical appraisal of three examples from microeconomics
Muller, S. (2023) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178x.2023.2202682 · Cited by 6
Privileged Irresponsibility
Bozalek, V. G., & Zembylas, M. (2023) · Palgrave critical university studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34996-6_3 · Cited by 2
Science Studies Elsewhere: The Experimental Life and the Other Within
Hofmänner, A. (2015) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2014.986558 · Cited by 2
Non-epistemic values in shaping the parameters for evaluating the effectiveness of candidate vaccines: the case of an Ebola vaccine trial
Varghese, J. (2021) · History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40656-021-00417-3 · Cited by 2
Mandelbrot’s Economics after a Quarter-Century
(2004) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822385646-013 · Cited by 2
Collective rationality
Townley, B. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298358.003.0009 · Cited by 2
Keynes, provincialized?
Sheppard, E. (2016) · Dialogues in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/2043820616653015 · Cited by 2
Changing Research Communities : Essays on Objectivity and Relativism in Contemporary Cultural Research
Koskinen, I. (2015) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 2
Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal , and: Philosophy of Science after Feminism (review)
Richardson, S. S. (2012) · NWSA Journal · doi:10.1353/ff.2012.0023 · Cited by 2
Making the case for case studies
Hodson, D. (2014) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.952149 · Cited by 2
You want the social? You can’t handle the social! Mirowski on the secret history of scientific philosophy
Hands, D. W. (2005) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.08.011 · Cited by 2
From Philosophy to Knowledge Management and Back Again
Aarons, J. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4852-9_29 · Cited by 2
Values and Co-production: Examining the Interface of Indigenous Peoples' Understandings and Scientific Understandings
Isaac, D. G. D. (2015) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 2
Don Ihde and Evan Selinger (eds.), Chasing Technoscience. Matrix for Materiality. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press (2003), xii+249 pp., $54.95 (cloth), $27.95 (paper).
Radder, H. (2004) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/423757 · Cited by 2
Freedom of Expression, Diversity, and Truth
Kappel, K., Hallsson, B. G., & Møller, E. F. L. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118869109.ch11 · Cited by 2
On the liberty of thought and discussion in economics
Eliassen, R. L. (2016) · Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) · Cited by 2
Collective Epistemic Responsibility: a Preventionist AccountPreprint
Fleisher, W., & Šešelja, D. (2020) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 1
Rethinking the History of Peptic Ulcer Disease: from digital textual analysis to declining research programsPreprint
Radomski, B. M., Šešelja, D., & Naumann, K. (2020) · doi:10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-.ppaah0l.v1 · Cited by 2
Technologie de la communication et épistémologie sociale
Conein, B. (2007) · Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.editionsehess.11338 · Cited by 2
What Concept Analysis in Philosophy of Science Should Be
Waters, C. K. (2004) · History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences · Cited by 2
Human nature & the open societyPreprint
Scott‐Phillips, T. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/k3cx9 · Cited by 2
Philosophy as a Protoscience
Costa, C. F. (2012) · Disputatio · doi:10.2478/disp-2012-0022 · Cited by 1
The attitude of Korean and Indonesian scientists toward Merton’s scientific norms
Rusmana, A. N., Aini, R. Q., Sya’bandari, Y., & Ha, M. (2024) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-023-10204-0 · Cited by 1
The Value of Independence between Experts: Epistemic Autonomy and Different Perspectives
Wright, J. (2024) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.20 · Cited by 1
Research environments vis-à-vis biological environments: ontological parallels, epistemic parallax, and metaphilosophical parallelization
Fábregas‐Tejeda, A. (2024) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-024-00603-7 · Cited by 1
Disagreement as a way to study misinformation and its effects
Hodel, D., & West, J. D. (2025) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-174 · Cited by 4
Genre knowledge: a metacognitive approach to exploring document practices in science
Dodson, S. (2025) · Information Research · doi:10.47989/ir30colis51931 · Cited by 1
Hermeneutical Pluralism in Psychiatry: Lessons from Spectrum 10K
Knox, B. (2025) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92958-8_10 · Cited by 1
On the value of pseudoscience and its philosophical study
Tuboly, Á. T. (2025) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-025-00672-2 · Cited by 1
Examining the Affordances of Engineering and Curricular Supports for Learning Among Emerging Bilingual Elementary Afterschool Students
Bateman, K. M., Kelly, G. J., Licona, P. R., & Cunningham, C. M. (2025) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.70007 · Cited by 1
Community-Based Ontology
Ludwig, D., & El-Hani, C. N. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197815281.003.0004 · Cited by 1
Knowledge of Mechanism and Pathophysiologic Reasoning
Bluhm, R. L., & Tonelli, M. R. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197503867.003.0004 · Cited by 1
A Critique of Defant’s Accusations Against Feminist Studies
Fine, C. (2025) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-025-10466-6 · Cited by 1
The role of epistemic norms in mitigating the spread of misinformation
Barnoy, A., Bakbani-Elkayam, S., Miller, B., & Keren, A. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448251385917 · Cited by 2
The Epistemology of Algorithmic Narrative and the Problem of Creative Authenticity
Rodrigues, T. V. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-01011-2 · Cited by 1

Authors: Longino, H. E.
Corresponding author: Longino, Helen E.
ORCID: Longino, Helen E.
Venue: Princeton University Press eBooks
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Published: 2002-12-31
DOI: 10.1515/9780691187013
OpenAlex: W1559582138
Cited by: 1,622
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 141 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 59
FWCI: 70.28
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
Keywords: social studies of science, knowledge socialization, philosophy of science, epistemology, local epistemologies, pluralism, sociology of knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Fate of Knowledge

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks