The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Fate of Knowledge
Abstract
Preface and Acknowledgments ix Chapter One: Introduction: The Rational-Social Dichotomy 1 Chapter Two: Taking Social Studies of Science Seriously 11 Chapter Three: The Philosophers Respond 42 Chapter Four: Disassembling the Rational-Social Dichotomy 77 Chapter Five: Socializing Cognition 97 Chapter Six: Socializing Knowledge 124 Chapter Seven: Clarifications and Responses 145 Chapter Eight: Pluralism and Local Epistemolgies 175 Chapter Nine: Conclusion 203 References 215 Index 227
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many philosophers of science hold that these value judgments are required to set evidential thresholds and if the agent is transparent about their judgment, consistently applies their threshold as new data emerges, and stays open to revising their stance, the resulting value-laden belief is unproblematic (e.g., Longino, 2002;Elliot & Richards, 2017).”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Longino, 2002
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,001
A Developmental Review of the Philosophical and Conceptual Foundations of Grey Systems Theory
Javanmardi, E., Liu, S., & Xie, N. (2022) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-022-09886-6 · Cited by 7
The Institutional Definition of Psychiatric Condition and the Role of Well-Being in Psychiatry
Knox, B. (2023) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1017/psa.2023.48 · Cited by 7
Emotions in scientific practice
Kozlov, A. (2023) · Interdisciplinary Science Reviews · doi:10.1080/03080188.2023.2193073 · Cited by 7
O CONSTRUTO DE PRÁTICAS EPISTÊMICAS EM PESQUISAS BRASILEIRAS EM EDUCAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS
Milena, L. M., Munford, D., & Fernandes, P. C. (2023) · Investigações em Ensino de Ciências · doi:10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2023v28n1p227 · Cited by 7
Lysaght, T., Capps, B., Subramaniam, M., & Chong, S. (2011) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00318.x · Cited by 7
Switching Gestalts on Gestalt Psychology: On the Relation between Science and Philosophy
Cat, J. (2007) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc.2007.15.2.131 · Cited by 7
Why reading the title isn't good enough: An evaluation of the 4S approach to evidence-based medicine
Borgerson, K. (2009) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.2979/fab.2009.2.2.152 · Cited by 7
Devising a framework for assessing the subjectivity and objectivity of information taxonomy projects
Alexander, F. (2013) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-09-2012-0117 · Cited by 7
The Structure of Explanations and Counter-Explanations of Homosexuality
Manus, F. G. M. (2012) · Open Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.4236/ojpp.2012.24035 · Cited by 7
Naturalizing the essential tension
D’Agostino, F. (2007) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9192-7 · Cited by 7
Rational Justification and Mutual Recognition in Substantive Domains
Westphal, K. R. (2013) · Dialogue · doi:10.1017/s0012217313000796 · Cited by 7
Eigi, J. (2016) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1077-1 · Cited by 7
The harms of ignoring the social nature of science
Weaver, S. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1479-8 · Cited by 7
Subjectifying objectivity: Delineating tastes in theoretical quantum gravity research
Gilbert, T. K., & Loveridge, A. (2021) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312720949691 · Cited by 7
Objectivity and orgasm: the perils of imprecise definitions
Wakil, S. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02886-8 · Cited by 7
The Moral Authority of Consensus
Walker, P. J., & Lovat, T. (2022) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhac007 · Cited by 7
Knowledge for What? Monist, Pluralist, Pragmatist Approaches to the Sciences of Behavior
Longino, H. E. (2011) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1951-4_2 · Cited by 7
Self-citationNaturalized epistemology, or what the Strong Programme can’t explain
Freedman, K. L. (2005) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2004.12.007 · Cited by 7
Moderate Epistemic Relativism and Our Epistemic Goals
Weinberg, J. M. (2007) · Episteme · doi:10.1353/epi.2007.0013 · Cited by 7
(2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308969.003.0001 · Cited by 7
Mark, S. L. (2020) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2020.1820433 · Cited by 7
Silva, F. C., & Sasseron, L. H. (2025) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00607-y · Cited by 6
Social epistemology for individuals like us
O’Rourke-Friel, M. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.59 · Cited by 6
Blancke, S. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03877-7 · Cited by 11
Silva, E. P. C., de Oliveira, S. T., & Franco, L. G. (2023) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2023.2244121 · Cited by 6
Kelly, G. J. (2024) · Éducation & didactique · doi:10.4000/11ny2 · Cited by 6
Ethnomethodological and Hermeneutic-Phenomenological Perspectives on Scientific Practices
Ginev, D. (2013) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/s10746-013-9264-2 · Cited by 6
Social Objectivity Under Scrutiny in the Pasteur–Pouchet Debate
Cerezo, J. A. L. (2015) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-015-9294-8 · Cited by 6
Paulo Freire, Indigenous Knowledge and Eurocentric Critiques of Development: Three Perspectives
Morrow, R. A. (2008) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789460911446_007 · Cited by 6
A Critical Review of Representative Sources on Multicultural Epistemology
Phillips, D. C., & Ruitenberg, C. W. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2066-4_2 · Cited by 6
The Significance of Self-Fulfilling Science
Lowe, C. (2018) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393118767087 · Cited by 6
What Is the Harm in Gendered Citation Practices?
McCusker, D. (2019) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/705495 · Cited by 8
Nirta, C. (2021) · Law and Critique · doi:10.1007/s10978-021-09286-y · Cited by 11
Science, institutions, and values
Mantzavinos, C. (2020) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12579 · Cited by 6
Participation in Biology Education Research Influences Students’ Epistemic Development
Lee, D. M., Wright, M., Faber, C. J., Kennedy, C., & Dittrich-Reed, D. R. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-11-0255 · Cited by 6
Historical growth of concept networks in Wikipedia
Ju, H., Zhou, D., Blevins, A. S., Lydon‐Staley, D. M., Kaplan, J. M., Tuma, J. R., & Bassett, D. S. (2022) · Collective Intelligence · doi:10.1177/26339137221109839 · Cited by 6
Epistemic diversity and industrial selection bias
Pinto, M. F., & Pinto, D. F. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04158-7 · Cited by 6
The Relations between Psychology and Feminism in "Times of Equality”
Dauder, S. G. (2010) · Quaderns de Psicologia · doi:10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.771 · Cited by 6
Experimentation versus Theory Choice: A Social-Epistemological Approach
Weber, M. (2011) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110322583.203 · Cited by 6
Encabo, J. V., & Martin, F. G. (2007) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691720601125456 · Cited by 6
Leuschner, A. (2015) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-015-9304-x · Cited by 6
Des voix de femmes dans la cité grecque archaïque : le cas des dédicaces athéniennes
Jacqmin, C. (2015) · Pallas · doi:10.4000/pallas.2988 · Cited by 6
Non-cognitive Values and Methodological Learning in the Decision-Oriented Sciences
Todt, O., & Luján, J. L. (2015) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-015-9482-3 · Cited by 6
Economics Imperialism in Social Epistemology
Pinto, M. F. (2016) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393115625325 · Cited by 6
The politicization of research methods, illustrated in the case of plant closures
Weller, S. (2020) · ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography · doi:10.1515/zfw-2019-0017 · Cited by 6
What, Me Worry? Research Policy and the Open Embrace of Industry-Academic Relations
Holman, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2021.600706 · Cited by 7
Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2016) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000178 · Cited by 6
The cyborg metaphor in Ibero-American science, technology and gender literature
Sued, G. (2018) · Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society · doi:10.1080/25729861.2018.1501242 · Cited by 6
Fine, C. (2020) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000070 · Cited by 6
Nunes, J. A. (2009) · RCCS Annual Review · doi:10.4000/rccsar.165 · Cited by 6
Contrastive Explanations as Social Accounts
Khalifa, K. (2010) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2010.506960 · Cited by 6
Campbell, M. B., Daston, L., Davidson, A. I., Forrester, J. M., & Goldhill, S. D. (2007) · Common Knowledge · doi:10.1215/0961754x-2007-015 · Cited by 6
Cross fertilizations between social Psychology of science and science feminist' studies
Dauder, S. G. (2003) · Athenea Digital Revista de pensamiento e investigación social · doi:10.5565/rev/athenead/v1n4.89 · Cited by 9
Zamora, J. S. (2017) · The Journal of Speculative Philosophy · doi:10.5325/jspecphil.31.2.0299 · Cited by 6
Thomas Kuhn's Relativistic Legacy
Bird, A. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781444392494.ch24 · Cited by 6
Waiting for certainty : young people, mobile phones and uncertain science
Christensen, C. (2007) · Cited by 6
Lehr, J. (2006) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 6
Post-growth and the lack of diversity in the scenario framework
Skaf, R. E. (2025) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178x.2025.2480069 · Cited by 5
Monist and Pluralist Approaches on Underdetermination: A Case Study in Evolutionary Microbiology
Bonnin, T. (2020) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-020-09513-7 · Cited by 7
Exploring the Relation of Values, Power, and Advocacy in American Sexual Science
Reiss, I. L. (2013) · International Journal of Sexual Health · doi:10.1080/19317611.2013.841791 · Cited by 5
ASSESSING THE ROLE OF NON-EPISTEMIC FEMINIST VALUES IN SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY
Rottschaefer, W. A. (2003) · Behavior and philosophy · Cited by 5
On the Ideal of Autonomous Science
Hicks, D. (2011) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/662255 · Cited by 5
How we Think About Human Nature: Cognitive Errors and Concrete Remedies
Werth, A. J., & Allchin, D. (2021) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-020-09726-5 · Cited by 7
Knight, L., & Kagotho, N. (2022) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel13010065 · Cited by 5
Art Value Creation and Destruction
Özdilek, Ü. (2023) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-022-09748-7 · Cited by 5
The diffusion of diagnosis and its implications for the epistemology and ontology of disease
Barth, Y., & Weinberg, D. (2023) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13720 · Cited by 5
Making Decision Models Fit for Purpose: The Importance of Ensuring Stakeholder Involvement
Harvard, S. S. (2024) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-023-01348-6 · Cited by 5
Ambrosj, J., Desmond, H., & Dierickx, K. (2024) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2024.2423358 · Cited by 5
Gender, Science, and Indigenous Medicine: Planning Research on Asian Women Professional Providers
Cameron, M. (2009) · Health Care for Women International · doi:10.1080/07399330802694906 · Cited by 6
Poutanen, S., & Kovalainen, A. (2010) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.5153/sro.2143 · Cited by 5
An Ecology of Epistemic Authority
Code, L. B. (2011) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2011.0004 · Cited by 5
Researchers Building Nations: Under What Conditions Can Overtly Political Research Be Objective?
Koskinen, I. (2015) · European studies in philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23015-3_10 · Cited by 5
Gender in the Substance of Chemistry, Part 2: An Agenda for Theory
Kovács, Á. Z. (2012) · Cited by 5
Las concepciones del mundo y los valores en la investigación psicológica
Castorina, J. A. (2016) · Cadernos de Pesquisa · doi:10.1590/198053143603 · Cited by 5
DRUG FACTS, VALUES, AND THE MORNING-AFTER PILL
ChoGlueck, C. (2021) · Public Affairs Quarterly · doi:10.2307/27009635 · Cited by 5
Public Conceptions of Scientific Consensus
Slater, M. H., Huxster, J. K., & Scholfield, E. R. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00569-z · Cited by 9
Exploring the limits of dissent: the case of shooting bias
Leuschner, A., & Pinto, M. F. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03783-y · Cited by 5
Values as heuristics: a contextual empiricist account of assessing values scientifically
ChoGlueck, C., & Lloyd, E. A. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04198-z · Cited by 5
Keuck, L. (2024) · Philosophy and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62241-0_9 · Cited by 5
Matters of Dwelling: Releasing the Genetically Engineered Aedes Aegypti Mosquito in Key West
Herndl, C. G., & Zarlengo, T. (2017) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1397799 · Cited by 5
The Bias Paradox: Are Standpoint Epistemologies Self-contradictory?
Engqvist, T. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2020.21 · Cited by 5
Steel, D. P. (2010) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-29719-7_12 · Cited by 5
Consensus, Dissensus, and Democracy: What Is at Stake in Feminist Science Studies?
Grebowicz, M. (2005) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/508955 · Cited by 5
Rational Disagreements in Phylogenetics
Manus, F. G. M. (2009) · Acta Biotheoretica · doi:10.1007/s10441-009-9072-2 · Cited by 5
Wray, K. B. (2010) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00014 · Cited by 5
Parsing pictures: on analyzing the content of images in science
Meynell, L. (2013) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888913000271 · Cited by 5
How Might We Put Gender Politics into Science?
Koertge, N. (2004) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/421417 · Cited by 5
Scientific Normativity as Non-Epistemic: A Hidden Kuhnian Legacy
Machamer, P. K., & Osbeck, L. M. (2003) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/0269112032000114804 · Cited by 5
Re-radicalizing Nelson's Feminist Empiricism
Sobstyl, E. (2004) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01271.x · Cited by 5
Conflicting Expert Testimony and the Search for Gravitational Waves
Almassi, B. (2009) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/605789 · Cited by 5
Philosophical Approaches to Nature
Zammito, J. H., Ivanhoe, P. J., Longino, H. E., & Sloan, P. R. (2008) · Philosophy and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6921-5_3 · Cited by 6
Self-citationInquiry Learning and Teaching in Science Education
Kelly, G. J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_36-1 · Cited by 5
Feminism, Epistemology & Morality
Holst, C. (2005) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 5
Firms finance and the weather: the UK weather derivatives market
Randalls, S. (2006) · University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham) · Cited by 5
The negativity crisis of AI ethics
Königs, P. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05378-9 · Cited by 6
Teymoori, A., & Trappes, R. (2026) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680261421875 · Cited by 7
The Contribution of Logic to Epistemic Injustice
Mangraviti, F. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2291775 · Cited by 5
Jackson, J. K., Fuselier, L., & Eason, P. K. (2024) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1186/s12052-024-00198-w · Cited by 7
Casuistic Reasoning, Standards of Evidence, and Expertise on Elite Athletes’ Nutrition
Jukola, S. (2019) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies4020019 · Cited by 4
Peer-Review and Academic Archaeology: Quality, Epistemology and Science Policies
Salazar, D., Ramírez, H., Yrarrázaval, S., Saball, A., Troncoso, A., Rogan, J. A., & Correa, C. (2019) · Archaeologies · doi:10.1007/s11759-019-09367-6 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Longino, H. E.
- Corresponding author
- Longino, Helen E.
- ORCID
- Longino, Helen E.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2002-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W1559582138
- Cited by
- 1,622
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 141 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 59
- FWCI
- 70.28
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
- Keywords
- social studies of science, knowledge socialization, philosophy of science, epistemology, local epistemologies, pluralism, sociology of knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review