The Fate of Knowledge

(Mis)Understanding scientific disagreement: Success versus pursuit-worthiness in theory choice

Lichtenstein, E. I. (2020) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.10.005 · Cited by 24

Strengthening the Epistemic Case against Epistocracy and for Democracy

BOUWEL, J. V. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2081823 · Cited by 22

Sisyphean science: why value freedom is worth pursuing

Menon, T., & Stegenga, J. (2023) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-023-00552-7 · Cited by 24

A microgenetic classroom study of learning to reason scientifically through modeling and argumentation

Chinn, C. A., Duschl, R. A., Duncan, R. G., Buckland, L. A., & Pluta, W. J. (2008) · Cited by 22

Experimental Philosophy of Explanation Rising: The Case for a Plurality of Concepts of Explanation

Colombo, M. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12340 · Cited by 22

Meta-Analysis, Ideals of Objectivity, and the Reliability of Medical Knowledge

Jukola, S. (2015) · Science & Technology Studies · doi:10.23987/sts.55344 · Cited by 23

Values in Psychological Science: Re-imagining Epistemic Priorities at a New Frontier

Osbeck, L. M. (2019) · Cited by 22

Why Gender Is a Relevant Factor in the Social Epistemology of Scientific Inquiry

Rolin, K. H. (2004) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/425943 · Cited by 22

Again, What the Philosophy of Biology is not

Callebaut, W. (2005) · Acta Biotheoretica · doi:10.1007/s10441-005-5352-7 · Cited by 24

Redundant, Secretive, and Isolated: When Are Clinical Trials Scientifically Valid?

Borgerson, K. (2014) · Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal · doi:10.1353/ken.2014.0029 · Cited by 21

Addressing Industry-Funded Research with Criteria for Objectivity

Elliott, K. C. (2018) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/699718 · Cited by 21

Science Journalism, Value Judgments, and the Open Science Movement

Elliott, K. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00071 · Cited by 20

Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy

Shaw, J. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02538-x · Cited by 26

Could our epistemic reasons be collective practical reasons?

Dyke, M. M. (2020) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12335 · Cited by 21

When Is Scientific Dissent Epistemically Inappropriate?

Miller, B. (2021) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/714854 · Cited by 21

Science and the Public

Potochnik, A. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009049474 · Cited by 21

Methods, Theories, Data, and the Social Dynamics of Organizational Research

Bitektine, A. B., & Miller, D. (2014) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492614546897 · Cited by 24

Are Epistemic Norms Fundamentally Social Norms?

Henderson, D. K. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2019.49 · Cited by 22

Reasons for Redundancy in Reflexivity: The Role of Diaries in Archaeological Epistemology

Mickel, A. (2015) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1179/2042458214y.0000000002 · Cited by 21

Method and Theoretical Psychology

Osbeck, L. M. (2005) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354305049742 · Cited by 20

Inquiry Tickets: Values, Pursuit, and Underdetermination

DiMarco, M., & Khalifa, K. (2019) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/705446 · Cited by 20

My objectivity is better than yours: contextualising debates about gender inequality

Worsdale, R., & Wright, J. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02835-5 · Cited by 20

Theory, Practice, and History in Critical GIS: Reports on an AAG Panel Session

Wilson, M. W., & Poore, B. S. (2009) · Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization · doi:10.3138/carto.44.1.5 · Cited by 20

Family Development Theory 30 Years Later

Martin, T. F. (2018) · Journal of Family Theory & Review · doi:10.1111/jftr.12237 · Cited by 24

Rival Visions of Parsimony

Gunitsky, S. (2019) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqz009 · Cited by 21

The distribution of ethical labor in the scientific community

Politi, V., & Grinbaum, A. (2020) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1724357 · Cited by 20

Rethinking the history of peptic ulcer disease and its relevance for network epistemology

Radomski, B. M., Šešelja, D., & Naumann, K. (2021) · History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40656-021-00466-8 · Cited by 26

Democratizing global climate governance? The case of indigenous representation in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

Rashidi, P., & Lyons, K. (2021) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2021.1979718 · Cited by 20

Science, values, and pragmatic encroachment on knowledge

Miller, B. (2014) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-014-0087-4 · Cited by 20

On the dangers of making scientific models ontologically independent: taking Richard Levins’ warnings seriously

Winther, R. G. (2007) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-006-9053-7 · Cited by 19

Feminist implications of model-based science

Potochnik, A. (2012) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.12.033 · Cited by 20

Values and Decisions

Todt, O., & Luján, J. L. (2014) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243914521019 · Cited by 20

Epistemological Odyssey: Introduction to Special Issue on the Diversity of Enactivism and Neurophenomenology

Vörös, S., Froese, T., & Riegler, A. (2016) · VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) · Cited by 20

Reduction, Explanation, and the New Science of Religion

Pearson, C. H., & Schunke, M. P. (2015) · Sophia · doi:10.1007/s11841-014-0438-9 · Cited by 19

A Social Epistemological Inquiry into Biases in Journal Peer Review

Jukola, S. (2016) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00237 · Cited by 19

Values in science: assessing the case for mixed claims

Peters, U. (2020) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2020.1712235 · Cited by 19

Towards a socially constructed and objective concept of mental disorder

Gagné‐Julien, A. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02647-7 · Cited by 19

WHAT DO SCIENTISTS KNOW ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE? A CASE STUDY OF NOVICE SCIENTISTS’ VIEWS OF NOS

Aydeniz, M., & Bilican, K. (2013) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9449-1 · Cited by 22

Reconstructing Science and Technology Studies: Views from Feminist Standpoint Theory

CAMPBELL, N. D. (2009) · Frontiers A Journal of Women Studies · doi:10.1353/fro.0.0033 · Cited by 19

Social psychological research on prejudice as collective action supporting emergent ingroup members

Ferguson, M. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Reynolds, K. J. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12294 · Cited by 19

Authority and morality in advocating heteroglossia

Jaspers, J. (2019) · Language Culture and Society · doi:10.1075/lcs.00005.jas · Cited by 20

The Importance of Worldviews for Developmental Psychology

Castorina, J. A. (2020) · Human Arenas · doi:10.1007/s42087-020-00115-9 · Cited by 19

Theory choice, non-epistemic values, and machine learning

Dotan, R. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02773-2 · Cited by 19

The personal and political economy of psychologists’ desires for social justice.

Walsh, R. T. G., & Gokani, R. (2013) · Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033081 · Cited by 19

Peer review practices: a content analysis of external reviews in science funding

Reinhart, M. (2010) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.3152/095820210x12809191250843 · Cited by 19

Institutionalized Intolerance of ADHD: Sources and Consequences

Hawthorne, S. C. C. (2010) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01113.x · Cited by 19

Making the abstract concrete: The role of norms and values in experimental modeling

Peschard, I., & van Fraassen, B. C. (2013) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.11.004 · Cited by 20

Diversity and Dissent in the Social Sciences

Rolin, K. H. (2010) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393110381212 · Cited by 31

Advocates or Unencumbered Selves? On the Role of Mill's Political Liberalism in Longino's Contextual Empiricism

Biddle, J. B. (2009) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/605791 · Cited by 19

Conventionalism: From Poincare to Quine

Ben‐Menahem, Y. (2006) · Cited by 19

Why Hermagoras Still Matters: The Fourth Stasis and Interdisciplinarity

Gross, A. G. (2004) · Rhetoric Review · doi:10.1207/s15327981rr2302_3 · Cited by 19

On the Interplay of the Cognitive and the Social in Scientific Practices

LACEY, H. M. (2005) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/508954 · Cited by 18

From Nature of Science to Social Justice: The Political Power of Epistemic Lessons

Allchin, D. (2020) · Science: Philosophy, History and Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47260-3_2 · Cited by 18

On the epistemic significance of practical reasons to inquire

Goldberg, S. C. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02833-7 · Cited by 18

How Dissent on Gender Bias in Academia Affects Science and Society: Learning from the Case of Climate Change Denial

Leuschner, A., & Pinto, M. F. (2021) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/713903 · Cited by 18

Feminist Engagement with Evolutionary Psychology

Fehr, C. (2011) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01221.x · Cited by 18

Standardized Study Designs, Value Judgments, and Financial Conflicts of Interest in Research

Elliott, K. C. (2016) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00222 · Cited by 18

In defense of meta-analysis

Holman, B. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1690-2 · Cited by 21

Presidential Address, PSA 2016: An Epistemology of Scientific Practice

Waters, C. K. (2019) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/704973 · Cited by 18

The Role of Ancient DNA Research in Archaeology

Downes, S. M. (2019) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-019-09665-2 · Cited by 18

Feminist anthropology and sociology

Crasnow, S. L. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044451542-1/50024-6 · Cited by 19

Practicing Geography

Sheppard, E. (2004) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00430.x · Cited by 18

Reorienting health-research communication

Kuruvilla, S., & Mays, N. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67580-0 · Cited by 18

Disagreement in science: introduction to the special issue

Dellsén, F., & Baghramian, M. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02767-0 · Cited by 18

Notes on a complicated relationship: scientific pluralism, epistemic relativism, and stances

Veigl, S. J. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02943-2 · Cited by 20

ENSINO DE CIÊNCIAS COMO PRÁTICA SOCIAL: RELAÇÕES ENTRE AS NORMAS SOCIAIS E OS DOMÍNIOS DO CONHECIMENTO

Silva, F. C., Nascimento, L. D. A., Valois, R. S., & Sasseron, L. H. (2022) · Investigações em Ensino de Ciências · doi:10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2022v27n1p39 · Cited by 17

Methodological and Cognitive Biases in Science: Issues for Current Research and Ways to Counteract Them

Pinto, M. F. (2023) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00589 · Cited by 21

Feminist Philosophy of Science

Bueter, A. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108956055 · Cited by 17

Why Understanding Science Matters

Rudolph, J. L. (2014) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x13520292 · Cited by 17

Contextualizing Gender Disparity in Editorship in Psychological Science

Lin, Z., & Li, N. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221117159 · Cited by 17

Whose social values? Evaluating Canada's ‘death of evidence’ controversy

Goldenberg, M. J. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00455091.2015.1079003 · Cited by 19

Diversity and the Fate of Objectivity

Freedman, K. L. (2009) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691720902741373 · Cited by 17

The Left Vienna Circle, Part 2. The Left Vienna Circle, disciplinary history, and feminist philosophy of science

Richardson, S. S. (2009) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.03.010 · Cited by 17

What concept analysis in philosophy of science should be (and why competing philosophical analyses of gene concepts cannot be tested by polling scientists)

Waters, C. K. (2004) · History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences · doi:10.1080/03919710412331341631 · Cited by 17

Scientific Knowledge: A Stakeholder Theory

Rolin, K. H. (2009) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230246867_4 · Cited by 17

Commentary: Advances in research on sourcing—source credibility and reliable processes for producing knowledge claims

Chinn, C. A., & Rinehart, R. W. (2016) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9675-3 · Cited by 17

Developing Epistemic Aims and Supports for Engaging Students in Scientific Practices

Kelly, G. J. (2018) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-018-9974-y · Cited by 17

Evaluating and Enriching Online Knowledge Exchange: A Socio-epistemological Perspective

Matthews, P., & Simon, J. (2012) · Annals of information systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3634-8_3 · Cited by 16

Images of Objective Knowledge Construction in Sexual Selection Chapters of Evolution Textbooks

Fuselier, L., Eason, P. K., Jackson, J. K., & Spaulding, S. A. (2018) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-018-9978-7 · Cited by 16

Analysis of Beliefs Acquired from a Conversational AI: Instruments-based Beliefs, Testimony-based Beliefs, and Technology-based Beliefs

Freiman, O. (2023) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2023.12 · Cited by 21

Women and cities. The conquest of urban space

Carrera, L., & Castellaneta, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2023.1125439 · Cited by 20

The CDF Collaboration and Argumentation Theory: The Role of Process in Objective Knowledge

Rehg, W. R., & Staley, K. W. (2008) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc.2008.16.1.1 · Cited by 16

Meta-considerations for Planning, Introducing and Standardising Inter and Transdisciplinary Learning in Higher Degree Institutions

Fam, D., Leimbach, T., Kelly, S., Hitchens, L., & Callen, M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_7 · Cited by 16

Understanding the Role of Objectivity in Machine Learning and Research Evaluation

Javed, S., Adewumi, T., Liwicki, F., & Liwicki, M. (2021) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies6010022 · Cited by 20

The Next Generation Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration: History, Philosophy, and Culture

Galison, P. L., Doboszewski, J., Elder, J., Martens, N. C. M., Ashtekar, A., Enander, J., Gueguen, M., Kessler, E. A., Lalli, R., Lesourd, M., et al. (2023) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies11010032 · Cited by 18

Contextualism in Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science

Rolin, K. H. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_2 · Cited by 16

Are there limits to scientists’ obligations to seek and engage dissenters?

Intemann, K. K., & de Melo‐Martín, I. (2014) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0414-5 · Cited by 16

The social bases of disciplinary knowledge and practice in productive disciplinary engagement

Kelly, G. J. (2013) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.008 · Cited by 16

Social and Rational: The Presentation of Nature of Science and the Uptake of Change in Evolution Textbooks

Fuselier, L., Jackson, J. K., & Stoiko, R. R. (2015) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21205 · Cited by 16

Journalism and Science: How to Erode the Idea of Knowledge

Meyer, G. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-6163-1 · Cited by 16

Standpoint Theory, in Science

Wylie, A., & Sismondo, S. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.85032-1 · Cited by 18

How non-epistemic values can be epistemically beneficial in scientific classification

Ahn, S. (2020) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.08.002 · Cited by 20

Social exclusion in academia through biases in methodological quality evaluation: On the situation of women in science and philosophy

Leuschner, A. (2015) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.08.017 · Cited by 15

The epistemic benefits of religious disagreement

Dormandy, K. (2019) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412518000847 · Cited by 15

A CONSTITUIÇÃO DE NORMAS E PRÁTICAS CULTURAIS NAS AULAS DE CIÊNCIAS: PROPOSIÇÃO E APLICAÇÃO DE UMA FERRAMENTA DE ANÁLISE

Nascimento, L. D. A., & Sasseron, L. H. (2019) · Ensaio · doi:10.1590/1983-21172019210104 · Cited by 15

Rethinking the theory-practice divide: How academia-industry collaboration contributes to theorising

Crespin‐Mazet, F., & Havenvid, M. I. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.01.003 · Cited by 15

Constructing Sustainability A Study of Emerging Scientific Research Trajectories

Miller, T. R. (2011) · Cited by 15

Philosophy of science for globalized privatization

Pinto, M. F. (2014) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.03.006 · Cited by 15

Intelligent Design and the Nature of Science: Philosophical and Pedagogical Points

Brigandt, I. (2013) · History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6537-5_11 · Cited by 15

What’s right about Carnap, Neurath and the Left Vienna Circle thesis: a refutation

Uebel, T. (2010) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.03.001 · Cited by 15

Dylemat rozumu scholastycznego: racjonalne kontra socjologiczne rekonstrukcje rozwoju wiedzy

Kuszyk-Bytniewska, M. (2012) · UMCS Library (Maria Curie-Skłodowska University)

The Study of Scientific Rationality——From Knowledge to Social Life

Xiang-tong, J. (2009) · Kexue jishu zhexue yanjiu

The Sociology of Knowledge vs. The Sociology of Science: A Conundrum and An Alternative

WETTERSTEN, J. R. (1983) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/004839318301300304 · Cited by 3

Explaining Scientific Beliefs: The Rationalist's Strategy Re-examined

Lugg, A. M. (1983) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/004839318301300301 · Cited by 4

Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge

Helman, D. H. (1989) · Philosophical Books · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0149.1989.tb02817.x · Cited by 6