The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Fate of Knowledge
Abstract
Preface and Acknowledgments ix Chapter One: Introduction: The Rational-Social Dichotomy 1 Chapter Two: Taking Social Studies of Science Seriously 11 Chapter Three: The Philosophers Respond 42 Chapter Four: Disassembling the Rational-Social Dichotomy 77 Chapter Five: Socializing Cognition 97 Chapter Six: Socializing Knowledge 124 Chapter Seven: Clarifications and Responses 145 Chapter Eight: Pluralism and Local Epistemolgies 175 Chapter Nine: Conclusion 203 References 215 Index 227
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many philosophers of science hold that these value judgments are required to set evidential thresholds and if the agent is transparent about their judgment, consistently applies their threshold as new data emerges, and stays open to revising their stance, the resulting value-laden belief is unproblematic (e.g., Longino, 2002;Elliot & Richards, 2017).”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Longino, 2002
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals
Duschl, R. A. (2008) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x07309371 · Cited by 1,078
Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22784 · Cited by 1,000
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction
Mayer, R. E., & Alexander, P. A. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203839089 · Cited by 969
Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change
Osborne, J. F. (2014) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1 · Cited by 663
Reasoning in Organization Science
Mantere, S., & Ketokivi, M. A. (2012) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0188 · Cited by 674
An introduction to science and technology studies
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3396 · Cited by 584
Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously
Brown, J. A. (2008) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2008.08.002 · Cited by 588
Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research
Miller, T. R., Baird, T. D., Littlefield, C. M., Kofinas, G., Chapin III, F. S., & Redman, C. L. (2008) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02671-130246 · Cited by 533
Entrepreneurship Education Research Revisited: The Case of Higher Education
Béchard, J., & Grégoire, D. A. (2005) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2005.16132536 · Cited by 458
Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology
CHINN, C. A., BUCKLAND, L. A., & SAMARAPUNGAVAN, A. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587722 · Cited by 524
Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning
Ford, M. (2008) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20263 · Cited by 402
Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars
Mayo, D. G. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781107286184 · Cited by 376
Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (2012) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4 · Cited by 375
Code, L. B. (2006) · doi:10.1093/0195159438.001.0001 · Cited by 340
‘Nothing includes everything’: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography
Barnes, T. J., & Sheppard, E. (2009) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132509343728 · Cited by 336
Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science
Potter, E. (2008) · Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470696132.ch13 · Cited by 332
25 Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now?
Intemann, K. (2010) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01138.x · Cited by 331
Case study research with moderate constructionism: Conceptualization and practical illustration
Järvensivu, T., & Törnroos, J. (2009) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.05.005 · Cited by 382
Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: A critical review
Schwanen, T., Banister, D., & Anable, J. (2011) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.005 · Cited by 321
Chapter 1: Redefining Disciplinary Learning in Classroom Contexts
Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x030001001 · Cited by 321
Epistemic Practices of Engineering for Education
Cunningham, C. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2017) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21271 · Cited by 282
Bias and values in scientific research
Wilholt, T. (2009) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.12.005 · Cited by 282
Epistemic Practices and Science Education
Kelly, G. J., & Licona, P. R. (2017) · Science: Philosophy, history and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62616-1_5 · Cited by 272
In defence of the value free ideal
Betz, G. (2013) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-012-0062-x · Cited by 260
Pathways to global city formation: a view from the developmental city-state of Singapore
Olds, K., & Yeung, H. W. (2004) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/0969229042000252873 · Cited by 253
Trust in Science and the Science of Trust
Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_8 · Cited by 248
Multiple Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers
Adams, R. S., Evangelou, D., English, L. D., de Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N. G., Pawley, A. L., Schiefellite, C., Stevens, R., Svinicki, M. D., Trenor, J. M., et al. (2011) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00004.x · Cited by 253
From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education
Colucci‐Gray, L., Camino, E., Barbiero, G., & Gray, D. (2006) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20109 · Cited by 239
Qualitative marketing research: a cultural approach
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-1620 · Cited by 235
On the Goals of Epistemic Education: Promoting Apt Epistemic Performance
Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2017) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968 · Cited by 265
Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science
Elliott, K. C., & McKaughan, D. J. (2014) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/674345 · Cited by 222
Scientific understanding: philosophical perspectives
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-4980 · Cited by 221
Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent From Scientific Activity
Manz, E. (2014) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654314558490 · Cited by 236
FORD, M. J. (2015) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21188 · Cited by 235
Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability
Frame, B., & Brown, J. A. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.010 · Cited by 218
Learners' epistemic criteria for good scientific models
Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20415 · Cited by 215
‘Grasp of Practice’ as a Reasoning Resource for Inquiry and Nature of Science Understanding
Ford, M. (2006) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7 · Cited by 220
Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk
Steel, D. P. (2010) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/650206 · Cited by 211
Knowledge Production through Critical GIS: Genealogy and Prospects
Sheppard, E. (2005) · Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization · doi:10.3138/gh27-1847-qp71-7tp7 · Cited by 209
The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning
Osborne, J. F. (2013) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006 · Cited by 244
Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mäntylä, T. (2015) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x · Cited by 207
A Dialogic Account of Sense-Making in Scientific Argumentation and Reasoning
Ford, M. J. (2012) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2012.689383 · Cited by 221
Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life
Lin, Z. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.230658 · Cited by 202
Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life
Lin, Z. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/sdx3j · Cited by 202
Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies
Shwom, R., Bidwell, D., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. M. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.003 · Cited by 197
Kuhn's Evolutionary Social Epistemology
Wray, K. B. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511997990 · Cited by 192
Repertoires: A post-Kuhnian perspective on scientific change and collaborative research
Ankeny, R. A., & Leonelli, S. (2016) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.08.003 · Cited by 186
Reconsidering the Character and Role of Inquiry in School Science: Analysis of a Conference
Grandy, R. E., & Duschl, R. A. (2006) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-005-2865-z · Cited by 182
The Implications of the New Materialisms for Feminist Epistemology
Frost, S. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_4 · Cited by 179
Provincializing Critical Urban Theory: Extending the Ecosystem of Possibilities
Helga Leitner, A., & Sheppard, E. (2015) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12277 · Cited by 178
Philosophy and Climate Science
Winsberg, E. B. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164290 · Cited by 182
Geographical political economy
Sheppard, E. S. (2010) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq049 · Cited by 176
Douglas, H. (2013) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/673716 · Cited by 175
The Premise and Promise of Indigenous Archaeology
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., Ferguson, T. J., Lippert, D., McGuire, R. H., Nicholas, G. P., Watkins, J. E., & Zimmerman, L. J. (2010) · American Antiquity · doi:10.7183/0002-7316.75.2.228 · Cited by 170
Values and Uncertainties in the Predictions of Global Climate Models
Winsberg, E. B. (2012) · Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal · doi:10.1353/ken.2012.0008 · Cited by 177
Revisiting Discovery and Justification
Schickore, J., & Steinle, F. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-4251-5 · Cited by 256
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement
Miller, B. (2012) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0225-5 · Cited by 164
Education for a “Post-Truth” World: New Directions for Research and Practice
Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2021) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x20940683 · Cited by 163
Thinking Geographically: Globalizing Capitalism and Beyond
Sheppard, E. (2015) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045608.2015.1064513 · Cited by 163
Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2018) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21488 · Cited by 174
Christodoulou, A., & Osborne, J. F. (2014) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21166 · Cited by 154
JUSTIFIED BELIEF IN A DIGITAL AGE: ON THE EPISTEMIC IMPLICATIONS OF SECRET INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES
Miller, B., & Record, I. (2013) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2013.11 · Cited by 153
Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., & Lloyd, E. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1198-6 · Cited by 151
Values in Science beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk
Brown, M. J. (2013) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/673720 · Cited by 152
Tuomela, R. (2004) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2004.1.2.109 · Cited by 149
Geographical relational poverty studies
Elwood, S. A., Lawson, V., & Sheppard, E. (2016) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132516659706 · Cited by 159
Kwan, M., & Schwanen, T. (2016) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2015.1123067 · Cited by 154
Intemann, K. (2009) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691720903364134 · Cited by 145
Miller, B. (2020) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243919900965 · Cited by 148
Knowledge in Sustainable Rural Development: From Forms of Knowledge to Knowledge Processes
Bruckmeier, K., & Tovey, H. (2008) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00466.x · Cited by 151
Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A., & Barzilai, S. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21468 · Cited by 165
Reintroducing Prediction to Explanation
Douglas, H. (2009) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/648111 · Cited by 141
Scientific and lay communities: earning epistemic trust through knowledge sharing
Grasswick, H. E. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9789-0 · Cited by 140
A Plurality of Pluralisms: Collaborative Practice in Archaeology
Wylie, A. (2015) · Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1_10 · Cited by 86
Personal interviews in cultural consumer research – post‐structuralist challenges
Moisander, J. K., Valtonen, A., & Hirsto, H. (2009) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253860903204519 · Cited by 137
Cizek, G. (2012) · Psychological methods · doi:10.1037/a0026975 · Cited by 118
Dialogic framing of scientific content for conceptual and epistemic understanding
Ford, M. J., & Wargo, B. M. (2011) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20482 · Cited by 134
Mirowski, P. (2004) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2003.11.002 · Cited by 130
Making Open Science Work for Science and Society
Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp4808 · Cited by 136
Ghost Marketing: Pharmaceutical Companies and Ghostwritten Journal Articles
Moffatt, B., & Elliott, C. (2007) · Perspectives in biology and medicine · doi:10.1353/pbm.2007.0009 · Cited by 126
Progress and challenges in coupled hydrodynamic-ecological estuarine modeling
Ganju, N., Brush, M., Rashleigh, B., Aretxabaleta, A., del Barrio, P. D., Grear, J., Harris, L., Lake, S., McCardell, G., O'Donnell, J., et al. (2015) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-015-0011-y · Cited by 100
Environmental issues: global natures in the space of assemblage
Braun, B. (2006) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132506070180 · Cited by 123
State of the field: Transient underdetermination and values in science
Biddle, J. B. (2012) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.09.003 · Cited by 120
From Science Studies to Scientific Literacy: A View from the Classroom
Allchin, D. (2014) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9672-8 · Cited by 123
“From Her Side of the Gossamer Wall(s)”: Reflexivity and Relational Knowing
Doucet, A. (2007) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/s11133-007-9090-9 · Cited by 119
Constructing free trade: from Manchester boosterism to global management
Sheppard, E. (2005) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00158.x · Cited by 118
Agnew, J. A. (2006) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/0309132506ph587xx · Cited by 117
The cultural side of science communication
Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317510111 · Cited by 134
Inconsistency, Asymmetry, and Non-Locality
Frisch, M. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0195172159.001.0001 · Cited by 141
Wray, K. B. (2007) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691720701674288 · Cited by 112
Risk, diagnostic error, and the clinical science of consciousness
Peterson, A. H., Cruse, D., Naçi, L., Weijer, C., & Owen, A. M. (2015) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.02.008 · Cited by 113
Three Problems with Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Chin-Yee, B. H., & Upshur, R. E. G. (2019) · Perspectives in biology and medicine · doi:10.1353/pbm.2019.0012 · Cited by 119
Biddle, J. B., & Leuschner, A. (2015) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-014-0101-x · Cited by 124
Wray, K. B. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108231633 · Cited by 111
Thomm, E., & Bromme, R. (2011) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20480 · Cited by 109
Who Contributes Knowledge? Core-Periphery Tension in Online Innovation Communities
Safadi, H., Johnson, S. L., & Faraj, S. A. (2020) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1364 · Cited by 113
Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction
Wylie, A. (2007) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9034-4 · Cited by 104
Maloy, J. P., Kwapisz, M., & Hughes, B. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-05-0136 · Cited by 113
Values and Objectivity in Science: Value-Ladenness, Pluralism and the Epistemic Attitude
CARRIER, M. J. (2012) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9481-5 · Cited by 105
The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge
Miller, B. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108588782 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Longino, H. E.
- Corresponding author
- Longino, Helen E.
- ORCID
- Longino, Helen E.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2002-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W1559582138
- Cited by
- 1,622
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 141 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 59
- FWCI
- 70.28
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
- Keywords
- social studies of science, knowledge socialization, philosophy of science, epistemology, local epistemologies, pluralism, sociology of knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
