The DOI matches its Crossref record.
4. Bargaining Experiments
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bilateral ultimatum and contract enforcement games (Camerer and Thaler 1995, Güth and Tietz 1990, Roth 1995, Fehr, Gächter and Kirchsteiger 1997) indicate that many subjects are willing to punish behavior that is perceived as unfair.”
From Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments (2000) · cites this paper as Roth 1995
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.980 · Cited by 4,547
“Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000142 · Cited by 1,898
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2002) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00027 · Cited by 1,061
Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases
Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.11.1.109 · Cited by 1,071
Metadata
- Authors
- Roth, A. E.
- Venue
- The Handbook of Experimental Economics
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1995-12-31
- Pages
- 253-348
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 4. Bargaining Experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9780691213255-006
- The paper
- Roth, A. E. (1995). 4. Bargaining Experiments. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691213255-006
