The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Appendix: An Introduction to the Standards of Scriptural Authenticity in Indian Buddhism
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Non-Mah ay ana opponents are in fact typically depicted as accepting this path and claiming that it is taught in non-Mah ay ana texts (Cabezo ´n 1992; Davidson 1990; Fujita 2009; Jaini 2002).”
From Early Indian Mahāyāna Buddhism II: New Perspectives (2010) · cites this paper as Davidson 1990
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Studies in Dhāraṇī Literature I: Revisiting the Meaning of the Term Dhāraṇī
Davidson, R. M. (2009) · Journal of Indian Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10781-008-9054-8 · Cited by 19
Self-citationEarly Indian Mahāyāna Buddhism II: New Perspectives
Drewes, D. (2010) · Religion Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00193.x · Cited by 12
Visions of the Buddha: Creative Dimensions of Early Buddhist Scripture
Shulman, E. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197587867.001.0001 · Cited by 9
Studies in dhāraṇī literature II: Pragmatics of dhāraṇī s
Davidson, R. M. (2014) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x13000943 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Davidson, R. M.
- Corresponding author
- Davidson, Ronald M.
- ORCID
- Davidson, Ronald M.
- Venue
- Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha
- Publisher
- University of Hawaii Press
- Published
- 1990-12-31
- Pages
- 291-326
- OpenAlex
- W4299915375
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Indian Buddhism, Buddhist scriptures, textual authority, canon formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Appendix: An Introduction to the Standards of Scriptural Authenticity in Indian Buddhism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9780824842611-012
- The paper
- Davidson, R. M. (1990). Appendix: An Introduction to the Standards of Scriptural Authenticity in Indian Buddhism. Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824842611-012
