Cited by 1,420Political Conflict and GovernancePolitical Theory and DemocracyPolitics and Society in Latin America

Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes

Linz, Juan J.·2000·Lynne Rienner Publishers eBooks

Abstract

In this classic work, noted political sociologist Juan Linz provides an unparalleled study of the nature of nondemocratic regimes. Linz's seminal analysis develops the fundamental distinction between totalitarian and authoritarian systems. It also presents a pathbreaking discussion of the personalistic, lawless, nonideological type of authoritarian rule that he calls (following Weber) the "sultanistic regime." The core of the book (including a 40-page bibliography) was published in 1975 as a chapter in the Handbook of Political Science, long out of print.The author has chosen not to change the original text for this new edition, but instead has added an extensive introduction reflecting on some of the contributions to the literature and the changes that have taken place in world politics and in the nature of regimes since the 1970s.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781685850043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Terms such as authoritarianism or patrimonialism denote specific, well-theorized constellations that are not directly commensurate with the hybrid, adaptive, and often electorally embedded modes of illiberal rule observed today.

    “Terms such as 'authoritarianism' or 'patrimonialism' denote specific, well- theorized constellations (Linz 2000; Weber 1968) that are not directly commensurate with the hybrid, adaptive, and often electorally embedded modes of illiberal rule observed today.”
  • Many past autocrats sought to impose comprehensive ideologies.

    “Many past autocrats sought to impose comprehensive ideologies.”

    From Informational Autocrats (2019) · cites this paper as Linz 2000

  • In totalitarian systems, comprehensive ideologies often involved holistic conceptions of man and society that legitimized the dictator's rule and required personal sacrifices.

    “In totalitarian systems, these often involved holistic conceptions of man and society that legitimized the dictator's rule and required personal sacrifices (Linz 2000, 76)”

    From Informational Autocrats (2019) · cites this paper as Linz 2000

  • Totalitarian ideologies decisively rejected capitalist democracy.

    “while decisively rejecting capitalist democracy.”

    From Informational Autocrats (2019) · cites this paper as Linz 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linz, J. J.
Corresponding author
Linz, Juan J.
Venue
Lynne Rienner Publishers eBooks
Published
2000-07-01
OpenAlex
W4300813480
Cited by
1,420
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 126 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 27
FWCI
37.81
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lynne Rienner Publishers eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
Keywords
totalitarianism, authoritarianism, non-democratic regimes, regime typology, Juan Linz

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review