Cited by 205Political Conflict and GovernanceMedia Influence and PoliticsPolitical Theory and Democracy

A theory of informational autocracy

Open access
Guriev, Sergei, Treisman, Daniel·2020·Journal of Public Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104158

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even subtle actions that many fear are the dominant mode of contemporary authoritarianism and backsliding typically are reflected in election results.

    “Even the types of subtle actions that many fear are the dominant mode of contemporary authoritarianism and backsliding (Guriev and Treisman 2020; Luo and Przeworski 2019; Przeworski 2019) typically are reflected in election results.”

    From Measuring Democratic Backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Guriev and Treisman 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Linz, Juan. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibra- tion. John Hopkins University Press
  2. Southerly, Natalie and John Otis. 2018. "Ecuador's U-turn away from media repression," Columbia Journalism Review, July 12, https://www.cjr.org/analysis/ecuador-moreno-correa-supercom- press-freedom.php.
  3. In Anderson, Simon, Stromberg, David, and Waldfogel, Joel, eds. Handbook of Media Economics. Volume 1A, Elsevier, pp. 593-622.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guriev, S., & Treisman, D.
Affiliations
  • Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Guriev, Sergei
Venue
Journal of Public Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
186
Pages
104158
ISSN
0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998692903
Cited by
205
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
33.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Economics (acceptedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
state propaganda, independent media, elite co-optation, political repression, regime change, soft authoritarianism, political modernization, democratic transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review