Cited by 20Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlDiabetes Management and ResearchHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

Glucose meters—fit for clinical purpose

Open access
Tirimacco, Rosy, Koumantakis, George, Erasmus, Rajiv, Mosca, Andrea, Sandberg, Sverre, Watson, Ian D., Goldsmith, Barbara, Gillery, Philippe·2013·Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Glucose meters have improved considerably since they were first introduced in 1960, but many questions are being asked about their accuracy and reliability in certain clinical situations. These questions have arisen because of the widespread use of these meters into clinical areas they have not been designed for such as critical care. The lack of understanding by some health professionals on factors that affect glucose results, such as sample type, glucose test strip methodologic limitations, calibration to recognized reference methods, and interferences, leads to misleading results that may affect patient care. Much debate continues on the quality specifications for glucose meters. Because there is an extensive use of these meters in different clinical scenarios, the setting of quality specifications will remain a challenge for regulatory and professional organizations. In this article, we have attempted to collect and provide relevant information addressing the limitations above. Pivotal to obtaining the best quality of results is education, particularly for diabetic patients monitoring their glucose. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine through its Point-of-Care Testing Task Force and its Working Group on Glucose Point-of-Care Testing is actively working toward improving the quality of glucose results by improving education and working with the industry to improve strip performance and work toward the better standardization of strips.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cclm-2013-0011

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]16. Hirose T, Tomoya M, Yoshio Y, Kawamori R, Hirotaka W. Glucose monitoring after fruit peeling: pseudohyperglycaemia. Diabetes Care 2011;34:596 -7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tirimacco, R., Koumantakis, G., Erasmus, R., Mosca, A., Sandberg, S., Watson, I. D., Goldsmith, B., & Gillery, P.
Affiliations
  • SA Health (AU)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • Aintree University Hospital (GB)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Tirimacco, Rosy
Venue
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
943-52
ISSN
  • 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-4331
OpenAlex
W1991544653
Cited by
20
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
blood glucose meters, point-of-care glucose testing, sample type, quality specifications, patient education
MeSH terms
Blood Chemical Analysis, Blood Glucose, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review