Cited by 10Wood Treatment and PropertiesForest ecology and managementForest Management and Policy

Evaluating timber quality in larger-diameter standing trees: rethinking the use of acoustic velocity

Krajnc, Luka, Farrelly, Niall, Harte, Annette M.·2019·Holzforschung

Abstract

The use of acoustic velocity for different purposes is becoming widespread in the forestry industry. However, there are conflicting reports on how well this technology reflects the mechanical properties of trees. In this study, the prediction of timber quality using acoustic technology was evaluated on mature standing trees of three softwood species. The velocity in 490 standing trees was measured in several directions (longitudinal, radial and tangential). A sub-sample of trees was felled and the acoustic velocity was measured in 120 logs which were then sawn into structural-sized timber. A total of 1383 boards were tested for bending, as were small clear specimens extracted from the structural-sized boards. The mean tree values of the timber grade-determining properties (elastic modulus, bending strength and density) of both specimen sizes were related to the acoustic velocities and tree slenderness. The correlations between the mean tree mechanical properties and acoustic velocities were relatively low, most likely due to a high ratio of diameter to measurement distance. The transverse directions showed similar correlations with mechanical properties in larger-diameter trees to the longitudinal direction, as did tree slenderness. The results suggest that while the acoustic velocity in the longitudinal direction can reflect the mean tree mechanical properties in small-diameter trees, alternatives are needed to achieve the same in larger-diameter trees.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/hf-2018-0232

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-destructive testing techniques are commonly used to estimate the mechanical properties of standing trees, logs, sawn timber and to evaluate existing timber structures.

    “Non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques are commonly used to estimate the mechanical properties of standing trees, logs, sawn timber and to evaluate existing timber structures [25 -32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krajnc, L., Farrelly, N., & Harte, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
Corresponding author
Harte, Annette M.
Venue
Holzforschung
Published
2019-04-08
Volume
73
Issue
9
Pages
797-806
ISSN
  • 0018-3830 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-434X
OpenAlex
W2939895528
Cited by
10
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Holzforschung (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Council for Forest Research and Development
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
sound velocity, wood quality, standing trees, softwood, elastic modulus, flexural strength, wood density, tree slenderness, longitudinal direction, non-destructive testing, structural timber

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review