Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Physique of Elite Female Artistic Gymnasts: A Systematic Review

Bacciotti, Sarita, Baxter-Jones, Adam, Gaya, Adroaldo, Maia, José·2017·Journal of Human Kinetics
DOI 10.1515/hukin-2017-0075
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It has been suggested that successful young gymnasts are a highly select group in terms of the physique. This review summarizes the available literature on elite female gymnasts’ anthropometric characteristics, somatotype, body composition and biological maturation. The main aims were to identify: (i) a common physique and (ii) the differences, if any, among competitive/performance levels. A systematic search was conducted online using five different databases. Of 407 putative papers, 17 fulfilled all criteria and were included in the review. Most studies identified similar physiques based on: physical traits (small size and low body mass), a body type (predominance of ecto-mesomorphy), body composition (low fat mass), and maturity status (late skeletal maturity as well as late age-at-menarche). However, there was no consensus as to whether these features predicted competitive performance, or even differentiated between gymnasts within distinctive competitive levels. In conclusion, gymnasts, as a group, have unique pronounced characteristics. These characteristics are likely due to selection for naturally-occurring inherited traits. However, data available for world class competitions were mostly outdated and sample sizes were small. Thus, it was difficult to make any conclusions about whether physiques differed between particular competitive levels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/hukin-2017-0075

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Albuquerque PA, Farinatti PTV. Development and validation of a new system for talent selection in female artistic gymnastics: The PDGO Battery. Rev Bras Med Esporte, 2007; 13: 157-164
  2. Baleani ME, López L, Petrele V, Ligüero ME, Loveira N, Zanelli A, Witriw AM. Female body composition in high performance artistic gymnastics. Prensa Med Argent, 2008; 95: 517-524
  3. Baxter-Jones ADG, Helms PJ. Effects of training at a young age: a review of the training of young athletes (TOYA) study. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 1996; 8: 310-327 · DOI
  4. Baxter-Jones ADG, Maffulli N, Mirwald RL. Does elite competition inhibit growth and delay maturation in some gymnasts? Probably not. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 2003; 15: 373-382 · DOI
  5. Baxter-Jones ADG, Thompson AM, Malina RM. Growth and maturation in elite young female athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2002; 10: 42-49 · DOI
  6. Bester A, Coetzee B. The anthropometric vault item performance determinants of young female gymnasts. South Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Rec, 2010; 32: 11-27
  7. Beunen G, Claessens AL, Van Esser M Somatic and motor characteristics of female gymnasts. Female athlete: a socio-psychological and kinanthropometric approach. Basel: Karguer, 176-185; 1981 · DOI
  8. Borms J, Caine DJ Kinanthropometry. In: Sands WA, Caine DJ, Borms J, editors. Scientific aspects of women’s gymnastics. Basel: Karguer, 110-127; 2003 · DOI
  9. Bradshaw EJ, Le Rossignol P. Anthropometric and biomechanical field measures of floor and vault ability in 8 to 14 year old talent-selected gymnasts. Sports Biomech, 2004; 3: 249-262 · DOI
  10. Caine D, Bass S, Daly R. Does elite competition inhibit growth and delay maturation in some gymnasts? Quite possibly. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 2003; 15: 360-372 · DOI
  11. Caine D, Lewis T, O’connor T, Howe W, Bass S. Does gymnastics training inhibit growth of females? Clin J Sport Med, 2001; 11: 260-270 · DOI
  12. Carter JEL, Heath BH Somatotyping-development and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 503; 1990
  13. Cassell C, Benedict M, Specker B. Bone mineral density in elite 7- to 9-yr-old female gymnasts and swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1996; 28: 1243-1246 · DOI
  14. Claessens AL. Talent detection and talent development: kinanthropometric issues. Acta Kinesiol Univ Tartu, 1999; 4: 47-64
  15. Claessens AL, Lefevre J, Beunen G, Malina RM. The contribution of anthropometric characteristics to performance scores in elite female gymnasts. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 1999; 39: 355-360
  16. Claessens AL, Lefevre J, Beunen GP, Malina RM. Maturity-associated variation in the body size and proportions of elite female gymnasts 14-17 years of age. Eur J Paediatr, 2006; 165: 186-192 · DOI
  17. Claessens AL, Veer FM, Lefevre J, Maes H, Steens G, Beunen G. Anthropometric characteristics of outstanding male and female gymnasts. J Sports Sci, 1991; 9: 53-74 · DOI
  18. Côté J. The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. Sport Psychol, 1999; 13: 395-417 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Coutinho P, Mesquita I, Fonseca AM. Talent development in sport: A critical review of pathways to expert performance. Int J Sports Sci Coach, 2016; 11: 279-293 · DOI
  20. De Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ, 2007; 85: 660-667 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Deutz RC, Benardot D, Martin DE, Cody MM. Relationship between energy deficits and body composition in elite female gymnasts and runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2000; 32: 659-668 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Eagleman AN, Rodenberg RM, Lee S. From ‘hollow-eyed pixies’ to ‘team of adults’: media portrayals of Olympic women’s gymnastics before and after an increased minimum age policy. Qualitat Res Sport Exer Health, 2014; 6: 401-421 · DOI
  23. Ferreira João A, Fernandes Filho J. Somatotype and body composition of elite Brazilian gymnasts. Sci Gymnastics J, 2015; 7: 45-53 · DOI
  24. Georgopoulos NA, Theodoropoulou A, Leglise M, Vagenakis AG, Markou KB. Growth and skeletal maturation in male and female artistic gymnasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2004; 89: 4377-4382 · DOI
  25. Malina RM, Bar-Or O, Bouchard C Growth, maturation, and physical activity. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2004 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Malina RM, Baxter-Jones ADG, Armstrong N, Beunen GP, Caine D, Daly RM, Lewis RD, Rogol AD, Russell K. Role of intensive training in the growth and maturation of artistic gymnasts. Sports Med, 2013; 43: 783-802 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Malina RM, Little BB, Bouchard C, Carter JEL, Hughes PCR, Kunze D, Ahmed L Growth status of Olympic athletes less than 18 years of age. In: Carter JEL, (ed.) Physical structure of Olympic athletes. Part II. Kinanthropometry of Olympic athletes. Basel: Karguer, 183-201; 1984 · DOI
  28. Massidda M, Toselli S, Brasili P, Calò CM. Somatotype of Elite Italian Gymnasts. Coll Antropol, 2013; 37: 853-857
  29. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. J Clin Epidemiol, 2009; 62: 1006-1012 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Monèm J Specific physical and physiological assessments of gymnasts. In: Jemni M, (ed.) The science of gymnastics. London: Routledge, 32-38; 2011
  31. Nana A, Slater GJ, Stewart AD, Burke LM. Methodology Review: Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for the Assessment of Body Composition in Athletes and Active People. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab, 2015; 25: 198-215 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Nunomura M, Oliveira MS. Parents’ Support in the Sports Career of Young Gymnasts. Sci Gymnastics J, 2013; 5: 5-17 · DOI
  33. Peeters MW, Claessens AL. The left hand second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) does not discriminate world-class female gymnasts from age matched sedentary girls. PLoS ONE, 2012; 7: 1-6
  34. Peeters MW, Claessens AL. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and competition level in world-class female gymnasts. J Sports Sci, 2013; 31: 1302-1311 · DOI
  35. Pool J, Binkhorst RA, Vos JA. Some anthropometric and physiological data in relation to performance of top female gymnasts. Int Z Angew Physiol, 1969; 27: 329-338 · DOI
  36. Sands WA. Physiology. In: Sands WA, Borms J, Caine DJ, editors. Scientific aspects of women’s gymnastics. Basel: Karger, 128-161; 2003 · DOI
  37. Sands WA, Slater C, Mcneal JR, Murray SR, Stone MH. Historical trends in the size of US olympic female artistic gymnasts. Int J Sport Physiol, 2012; 7: 350-356 · DOI
  38. Sleeper MD, Kenyon LK, Casey E. Measuring fitness in female gymnasts: the gymnastics functional measurement tool. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2012; 7: 124-138
  39. Soric M, Misigoj-Durakovic M, Pedisic Z. Dietary intake and body composition of prepubescent female aesthetic athletes. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab, 2008; 18: 343-354 312p · DOI
  40. Theintz GE, Howald H, Allemann Y, Sizonenko PC. Growth and pubertal development of young female gymnasts and swimmers: a correlation with parental data. Int J Sports Med, 1989; 10: 87-91 · DOI
  41. Thorland WG, Johnson GO, Fagot TG, Tharp GD, Hammer RW. Body composition and somatotype characteristics of junior Olympic athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1981; 13: 332-338 · DOI
  42. Vandorpe B, Vandendriessche JB, Vaeyens R, Pion J, Lefevre J, Philippaerts RM, Lenoir M. The value of a non-sport-specific motor test battery in predicting performance in young female gymnasts. J Sport Sci, 2012; 30: 497-505 · DOI
  43. Wilmore JH. Body composition in sport and exercise: directions for future research. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1983; 15: 21-31 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bacciotti, S., Baxter-Jones, A., Gaya, A., & Maia, J.
Venue
Journal of Human Kinetics
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
247-259
ISSN
1899-7562
DOI
10.1515/hukin-2017-0075
Cited by
29
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.