Cited by 306Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

COMPARATIVE NOTES ON PREDATION BY LION, LEOPARD, CHEETAH AND WILD DOG IN THE SERENGETI AREA, EAST AFRICA

KRUUK, H., TURNER, M.·1967·Mammalia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/mamm.1967.31.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carnivore prey preferences are largely determined by the size of their prey.

    “Antelopes were grouped based on size, as carnivore prey preferences are largely determined by the size of their prey (Kruuk and Turner 1967;A. R. Sinclair et al. 2003).”

    From A Food Web Model of the Serengeti: Stability, Dynamics and Indirect Effects (2026) · cites this paper as Kruuk and Turner 1967

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KRUUK, H., & TURNER, M.
Venue
Mammalia
Published
1967
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
1-27
ISSN
  • 0025-1461 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-1547
OpenAlex
W2035316222
Cited by
306
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mammalia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
predation, lion, leopard, cheetah, wild dogs, carnivore diet, Serengeti, predator-prey interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review