Cited by 557Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Planning for success: Serengeti lions seek prey accessibility rather than abundance

HOPCRAFT, J. GRANT C., SINCLAIR, A. R. E., PACKER, CRAIG·2005·Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Summary We used long‐term radio‐telemetry data to investigate how Serengeti lions (Panthera leo) distribute themselves with respect to hunting opportunities. Specifically, we investigate whether lions hunt in areas where prey are easy to capture or where prey are locally abundant. We used resource‐selection functions (logistic regressions) to measure the location of kills/carcasses with respect to five different habitats: the view‐sheds from large rocky outcrops, river confluences, woodland vegetation, erosion embankments and water sources. As expected for a sit‐and‐wait predator, resting lions spent more time in areas with good cover. On a broad‐scale, lions shifted their ranges according to the seasonal movement of prey, but at a finer scale (< 100 m) lions fed in areas with high prey ‘catchability’ rather than high prey density. Plains lions selected erosion embankments, view‐sheds from rocky outcrops, and access to free water. Woodland lions tended to use erosion embankments, and woody vegetation. The results emphasize the importance of fine‐scale landscape and habitat features when assessing predator–prey theory and conservation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00955.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For Serengeti lions, kills were more closely associated with good hunting habitats (stalking cover) than with areas of high prey abundance.

    “Hopcraft et al. (2005) found similar patterns for Serengeti lions (Panthera leo), whereby lion kills were more closely associated with good hunting habitats (in this case, stalking cover) than areas of high prey abundance.”

    From Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator–prey system (2007) · cites this paper as Hopcraft et al. 2005

  • Viewsheds have previously been shown to influence predation sites.

    “Although viewsheds have previously been shown to influence predation sites [19], quantification of 3D vegetation structure and how animals perceive their surroundings is challenging in the field, and field-based measurements are difficult to translate into viewsheds (i.e. what an animal will actually be able to see).”
  • Lions usually hunt in groups and are considered ambush predators, choosing prey catchability over prey abundance and relying heavily on concealment during hunting.

    “Lions usually hunt in groups [35] and are considered ambush predators, choosing prey ‘catchability’ over prey abundance and rely heavily on concealment during hunting [19].”
  • Dense vegetation at kill sites provides cover for stalking lions and suggests an ambush style of attack.

    “These conditions provide cover for stalking lions and suggest an ambush style of attack, in keeping with findings for lions elsewhere [19,22].”
  • Although vegetation structure has previously been recognized as an important component of lion hunting success, it has been considered less influential relative to other environmental variables.

    “Although vegetation structure has previously been recognized as an important component of lion hunting success [16,19,36,37], it has been considered less influential relative to other environmental variables [23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HOPCRAFT, J. G. C., SINCLAIR, A. R. E., & PACKER, C.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
HOPCRAFT, J. GRANT C.
Venue
Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
559-566
ISSN
  • 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2656
OpenAlex
W1739950599
Cited by
557
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 30
FWCI
11.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
lion, hunting behavior, prey density, habitat selection, resource selection functions, water access, woodland habitat, predator-prey interactions, lion conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review