Cited by 486Language and cultural evolutionChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentPrimate Behavior and Ecology

How to learn about teaching: An evolutionary framework for the study of teaching behavior in humans and other animals

Kline, Michelle Ann·2015·Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Abstract

The human species is more reliant on cultural adaptation than any other species, but it is unclear how observational learning can give rise to the faithful transmission of cultural adaptations. One possibility is that teaching facilitates accurate social transmission by narrowing the range of inferences that learners make. However, there is wide disagreement about how to define teaching, and how to interpret the empirical evidence for teaching across cultures and species. In this article I argue that disputes about the nature and prevalence of teaching across human societies and nonhuman animals are based on a number of deep-rooted theoretical differences between fields, as well as on important differences in how teaching is defined. To reconcile these disparate bodies of research, I review the three major approaches to the study of teaching - mentalistic, culture-based, and functionalist - and outline the research questions about teaching that each addresses. I then argue for a new, integrated framework that differentiates between teaching types according to the specific adaptive problems that each type solves, and apply this framework to restructure current empirical evidence on teaching in humans and nonhuman animals. This integrative framework generates novel insights, with broad implications for the study of the evolution of teaching, including the roles of cognitive constraints and cooperative dilemmas in how and when teaching evolves. Finally, I propose an explanation for why some types of teaching are uniquely human, and discuss new directions for research motivated by this framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x14000090

Cites

171 of 171 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kline, M. A.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kline, Michelle Ann
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
2014-05-23
Volume
38
Pages
e31-e31
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
OpenAlex
W2064673991
Cited by
486
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
20.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
teacher behavior, evolution of teaching, observational learning, cultural transmission, social learning, teaching type, cognitive limitations, functionalism, evolutionary framework
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Animals, Humans, Learning, Social Behavior, Teaching, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review