Cited by 143Wildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and EcologyMarine animal studies overview

Foraging dynamics of lions in a semi-arid environment

Stander, P. E.·1992·Canadian Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Direct observations on the foraging activities of lions, based on 920 attempts to capture prey and 156 kills, on the plains of Etosha National Park, Namibia, revealed a regular nocturnal pattern of mostly coordinated group hunting. Lions scavenged rarely and killed mainly prey animals weighing less than 50 kg, which contributed to 73% of the observed kills and 50% of the estimated biomass consumed. Capture success increased with lion group size and was also greater during coordinated group hunts. Lions hunted most of the prey that they encountered, showing a preference for large prey species. Average food acquisition ranged from 8.7 kg/day per lioness in the dry season to 14 kg/day per lioness in the wet season. During the dry season, coordinated cooperative hunting was essential and lionesses most often formed groups of 2, thereby acquiring higher daily food intake than groups of other sizes. In the wet season, lioness groups of all sizes obtained more than the estimated daily requirements, and lionesses did not uniformly forage in the smaller groups capable of greater food acquisition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/z92-002

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lions hunt more successfully when wind orientation favors stalking, enabling them to approach downwind of and closer to potential prey.

    “Lions generally hunt more successfully on darker nights when it is easier to hide [23,36], and when wind orientation favors stalking [38], enabling them to approach downwind of and closer to potential prey.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stander, P. E.
Corresponding author
Stander, P. E.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Published
1992-01-01
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
8-21
ISSN
  • 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3283
OpenAlex
W2022908501
Cited by
143
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
cooperative hunting, nocturnal hunting, scavenging, prey size preference, capture success, group size, daily food intake, seasonal variation, semi-arid savanna, Etosha National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review